From 5103b2f2415c21b2999cf9a4f92dca82b5becaab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "github-actions[bot]" Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 13:16:22 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] chore(altair): add metadata for timeseries-forecast-uncertainty --- .../implementations/python/altair.py | 19 +- .../metadata/python/altair.yaml | 247 +----------------- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 248 deletions(-) diff --git a/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/implementations/python/altair.py b/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/implementations/python/altair.py index 40ba802844..b0ecbcd2e4 100644 --- a/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/implementations/python/altair.py +++ b/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/implementations/python/altair.py @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -""" anyplot.ai +"""anyplot.ai timeseries-forecast-uncertainty: Time Series Forecast with Uncertainty Band Library: altair 6.1.0 | Python 3.13.13 -Quality: 94/100 | Updated: 2026-05-16 +Quality: 94/100 | Updated: 2026-05-19 """ import os @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ # Okabe-Ito palette BRAND = "#009E73" # First series - historical data FORECAST_COLOR = "#D55E00" # Second series - forecast -NEUTRAL = "#1A1A1A" if THEME == "light" else "#E8E8E0" # Data - Monthly sales with 36 months history + 12 months forecast np.random.seed(42) @@ -48,7 +47,7 @@ upper_95 = forecast_values + 1.96 * forecast_std # Create DataFrames -historical_df = pd.DataFrame({"date": historical_dates, "actual": historical_values, "series": "Historical"}) +historical_df = pd.DataFrame({"date": historical_dates, "actual": historical_values}) forecast_df = pd.DataFrame( { @@ -58,7 +57,6 @@ "upper_80": upper_80, "lower_95": lower_95, "upper_95": upper_95, - "series": "Forecast", } ) @@ -111,7 +109,7 @@ forecast_start = pd.DataFrame({"date": [pd.Timestamp("2024-01-01")]}) vertical_rule = alt.Chart(forecast_start).mark_rule(strokeWidth=2, strokeDash=[6, 3], color=INK_SOFT).encode(x="date:T") -# Add legend data for clarity +# Legend via invisible points (standard Altair pattern for layered charts with alt.value() colors) legend_df = pd.DataFrame( { "date": [historical_dates[0], forecast_dates[0], forecast_dates[0]], @@ -142,7 +140,7 @@ height=900, background=PAGE_BG, title=alt.Title( - "timeseries-forecast-uncertainty · altair · anyplot.ai", + "timeseries-forecast-uncertainty · python · altair · anyplot.ai", fontSize=28, anchor="middle", color=INK, @@ -156,12 +154,13 @@ titleFontSize=22, labelColor=INK_SOFT, titleColor=INK, - domainColor=INK_SOFT, - tickColor=INK_SOFT, + domain=False, + tickSize=0, gridColor=INK, gridOpacity=0.10, ) - .configure_view(fill=PAGE_BG, stroke=INK_SOFT, strokeWidth=0) + .configure_axisX(grid=False) + .configure_view(fill=PAGE_BG, stroke=None, strokeWidth=0) .configure_legend( titleFontSize=16, labelFontSize=14, diff --git a/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/metadata/python/altair.yaml b/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/metadata/python/altair.yaml index cda3136357..7e4e0e7e68 100644 --- a/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/metadata/python/altair.yaml +++ b/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/metadata/python/altair.yaml @@ -1,10 +1,13 @@ +# Per-library metadata for altair implementation of timeseries-forecast-uncertainty +# Auto-generated by impl-generate.yml + library: altair language: python specification_id: timeseries-forecast-uncertainty created: '2026-01-07T16:29:40Z' -updated: '2026-05-16T22:32:34Z' -generated_by: claude-haiku -workflow_run: 25974565145 +updated: '2026-05-19T13:16:21Z' +generated_by: claude-sonnet +workflow_run: 26099236924 issue: 3188 language_version: 3.13.13 library_version: 6.1.0 @@ -12,239 +15,7 @@ preview_url_light: https://storage.googleapis.com/anyplot-images/plots/timeserie preview_url_dark: https://storage.googleapis.com/anyplot-images/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/python/altair/plot-dark.png preview_html_light: https://storage.googleapis.com/anyplot-images/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/python/altair/plot-light.html preview_html_dark: https://storage.googleapis.com/anyplot-images/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/python/altair/plot-dark.html -quality_score: 94 +quality_score: null review: - strengths: - - 'Perfect theme adaptation: both light and dark renders are readable with proper - color mapping' - - Sophisticated confidence band visualization using opacity hierarchy to show multiple - uncertainty levels - - Clean, idiomatic Altair code with proper layering and composition - - 'Excellent typography and legibility: all text (title, labels, ticks) clearly - visible in both themes' - - 'Strong spec compliance: implements all required features (historical line, forecast - line, dual confidence bands, vertical rule, legend)' - weaknesses: - - Design polish could be slightly enhanced with subtle spine removal or grid refinement - - Legend construction is custom but could be simplified with built-in Altair mechanisms - image_description: "Light render (plot-light.png):\n Background: Warm off-white\ - \ (#FAF8F1) with subtle gray grid lines. Title \"timeseries-forecast-uncertainty\ - \ · altair · anyplot.ai\" and subtitle \"Monthly Sales with 80% and 95% Confidence\ - \ Intervals\" clearly visible in dark text (fontSize 28 and 20). Axes labeled\ - \ \"Date\" (x) and \"Sales (thousands USD)\" (y) with large, readable tick labels\ - \ (fontSize 18). \n Chrome: All text elements are dark on light background, fully\ - \ legible. Axis lines and grid in light gray. Legend positioned right with colors\ - \ and labels readable.\n Data: Historical period (2021-2023) shown as solid green\ - \ line (#009E73) with clear seasonal oscillations. Forecast period (2024) shown\ - \ as orange dashed line (#D55E00) with nested confidence bands—95% CI in light\ - \ orange (opacity 0.15) and 80% CI in darker orange (opacity 0.3). Vertical dashed\ - \ rule at 2024-01-01 marks forecast start. Y-scale (50-270) accommodates all data\ - \ with margin.\n Legibility verdict: PASS - All text, lines, and bands are clearly\ - \ readable against the light background.\n\nDark render (plot-dark.png):\n Background:\ - \ Warm near-black (#1A1A17) with subtle grid lines. Title and subtitle in light\ - \ text (INK token #F0EFE8), fully visible against dark background. Axis labels\ - \ and ticks in light text (INK_SOFT token #B8B7B0), all readable with no dark-on-dark\ - \ failures.\n Chrome: Legend frame uses elevated dark background (#242420) with\ - \ light text labels, creating good contrast. Axis lines in light color. Grid subtle\ - \ but visible.\n Data: Historical line remains green (#009E73)—identical to light\ - \ render. Forecast dashed line remains orange (#D55E00)—identical to light render.\ - \ Confidence bands use same orange shades with identical opacity values. Vertical\ - \ rule is light dashed line, clearly visible. Seasonal and trend patterns identical\ - \ to light render.\n Legibility verdict: PASS - All text is readable on dark\ - \ background (no dark-on-dark issues). Data colors are identical to light render;\ - \ only chrome (backgrounds, text, grid) adapts to theme." - criteria_checklist: - visual_quality: - score: 30 - max: 30 - items: - - id: VQ-01 - name: Text Legibility - score: 8 - max: 8 - passed: true - comment: Title, subtitle, axis labels, ticks all explicitly sized and colored; - readable in both themes - - id: VQ-02 - name: No Overlap - score: 6 - max: 6 - passed: true - comment: No overlapping elements; legend positioned cleanly on right - - id: VQ-03 - name: Element Visibility - score: 6 - max: 6 - passed: true - comment: Historical line (solid), forecast (dashed), both CI bands (opacity - 0.15 and 0.3) all clearly visible - - id: VQ-04 - name: Color Accessibility - score: 2 - max: 2 - passed: true - comment: 'Uses Okabe-Ito colors #009E73 and #D55E00; CVD-safe palette; not - red-green sole signal' - - id: VQ-05 - name: Layout & Canvas - score: 4 - max: 4 - passed: true - comment: 1600×900 (4800×2700 with scale_factor=3.0); good proportions; nothing - cut off - - id: VQ-06 - name: Axis Labels & Title - score: 2 - max: 2 - passed: true - comment: Title, subtitle, axis labels all descriptive with units - - id: VQ-07 - name: Palette Compliance - score: 2 - max: 2 - passed: true - comment: 'First series #009E73, second series #D55E00; page backgrounds #FAF8F1 - (light) and #1A1A17 (dark); both renders theme-correct' - design_excellence: - score: 15 - max: 20 - items: - - id: DE-01 - name: Aesthetic Sophistication - score: 6 - max: 8 - passed: true - comment: Theme tokens, nested CI visualization, custom legend; professional - but could refine further - - id: DE-02 - name: Visual Refinement - score: 4 - max: 6 - passed: true - comment: Subtle grid (opacity 0.10), clean composition; could enhance with - spine removal - - id: DE-03 - name: Data Storytelling - score: 5 - max: 6 - passed: true - comment: Clear distinction (solid vs dashed), confidence band progression, - vertical rule focal point; excellent narrative - spec_compliance: - score: 15 - max: 15 - items: - - id: SC-01 - name: Plot Type - score: 5 - max: 5 - passed: true - comment: Correct time series with uncertainty bands - - id: SC-02 - name: Required Features - score: 4 - max: 4 - passed: true - comment: Historical line, forecast dashed line, 80% CI, 95% CI, vertical rule, - legend all present - - id: SC-03 - name: Data Mapping - score: 3 - max: 3 - passed: true - comment: 'X: dates; Y: sales with appropriate scale; all CI bounds encoded - correctly' - - id: SC-04 - name: Title & Legend - score: 3 - max: 3 - passed: true - comment: Title and legend labels descriptive and complete - data_quality: - score: 15 - max: 15 - items: - - id: DQ-01 - name: Feature Coverage - score: 6 - max: 6 - passed: true - comment: Shows historical, forecast, dual CI levels; seasonal and trend components - visible - - id: DQ-02 - name: Realistic Context - score: 5 - max: 5 - passed: true - comment: Monthly sales data realistic; values plausible (100-210k USD); extends - naturally - - id: DQ-03 - name: Appropriate Scale - score: 4 - max: 4 - passed: true - comment: Y-scale includes all data with margin; time range reasonable - code_quality: - score: 10 - max: 10 - items: - - id: CQ-01 - name: KISS Structure - score: 3 - max: 3 - passed: true - comment: No functions/classes; linear flow - - id: CQ-02 - name: Reproducibility - score: 2 - max: 2 - passed: true - comment: np.random.seed(42) - - id: CQ-03 - name: Clean Imports - score: 2 - max: 2 - passed: true - comment: 'Only necessary imports: os, altair, numpy, pandas' - - id: CQ-04 - name: Code Elegance - score: 2 - max: 2 - passed: true - comment: Appropriate complexity; no fake interactivity - - id: CQ-05 - name: Output & API - score: 1 - max: 1 - passed: true - comment: Saves plot-{THEME}.png and plot-{THEME}.html; scale_factor=3.0 - library_mastery: - score: 9 - max: 10 - items: - - id: LM-01 - name: Idiomatic Usage - score: 5 - max: 5 - passed: true - comment: 'Uses recommended patterns: alt.Chart().mark_*().encode(); proper - alt.layer(); theme integration via configure_*' - - id: LM-02 - name: Distinctive Features - score: 4 - max: 5 - passed: true - comment: Layered composition, custom legend, theme-adaptive styling, opacity - hierarchy; showcases Altair well - score_caps_applied: [] - verdict: APPROVED -impl_tags: - dependencies: [] - techniques: - - layer-composition - - custom-legend - patterns: - - data-generation - dataprep: [] - styling: - - theme-adaptive + strengths: [] + weaknesses: [] From e6e041eb72cf2865944d8398209806500b058d83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "github-actions[bot]" Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 13:22:22 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] chore(altair): update quality score 88 and review feedback for timeseries-forecast-uncertainty --- .../implementations/python/altair.py | 4 +- .../metadata/python/altair.yaml | 239 +++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 234 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/implementations/python/altair.py b/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/implementations/python/altair.py index b0ecbcd2e4..5172e64a28 100644 --- a/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/implementations/python/altair.py +++ b/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/implementations/python/altair.py @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -"""anyplot.ai +""" anyplot.ai timeseries-forecast-uncertainty: Time Series Forecast with Uncertainty Band Library: altair 6.1.0 | Python 3.13.13 -Quality: 94/100 | Updated: 2026-05-19 +Quality: 88/100 | Updated: 2026-05-19 """ import os diff --git a/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/metadata/python/altair.yaml b/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/metadata/python/altair.yaml index 7e4e0e7e68..1c1d15ea5f 100644 --- a/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/metadata/python/altair.yaml +++ b/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/metadata/python/altair.yaml @@ -1,11 +1,8 @@ -# Per-library metadata for altair implementation of timeseries-forecast-uncertainty -# Auto-generated by impl-generate.yml - library: altair language: python specification_id: timeseries-forecast-uncertainty created: '2026-01-07T16:29:40Z' -updated: '2026-05-19T13:16:21Z' +updated: '2026-05-19T13:22:22Z' generated_by: claude-sonnet workflow_run: 26099236924 issue: 3188 @@ -15,7 +12,235 @@ preview_url_light: https://storage.googleapis.com/anyplot-images/plots/timeserie preview_url_dark: https://storage.googleapis.com/anyplot-images/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/python/altair/plot-dark.png preview_html_light: https://storage.googleapis.com/anyplot-images/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/python/altair/plot-light.html preview_html_dark: https://storage.googleapis.com/anyplot-images/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/python/altair/plot-dark.html -quality_score: null +quality_score: 88 review: - strengths: [] - weaknesses: [] + strengths: + - 'Full spec compliance: all required elements (historical line, dashed forecast, + nested CI bands, vertical rule, legend) implemented correctly' + - 'Proper Okabe-Ito palette: #009E73 for historical, #D55E00 for forecast — exact + canonical order' + - 'Clean theme adaptation: all chrome tokens (INK, INK_SOFT, PAGE_BG, ELEVATED_BG) + correctly applied in both light and dark renders; no dark-on-dark failures' + - 'Good statistical realism: CI widths grow with forecast horizon (linspace 5→20 + std), matching real forecasting model behavior' + - 'Clean axis styling: domain lines removed, tick marks removed, x-axis grid disabled, + y-axis grid subtle at 0.10 opacity' + - Reproducible with np.random.seed(42) and exports both PNG and HTML + weaknesses: + - 'Canvas size deviates from style guide: uses width=1600, height=900, scale_factor=3.0 + (4800x2700 px) instead of recommended width=800, height=450, scale_factor=4.0 + (3200x1800 px)' + - 'DE-03 low: no annotation or callout at the forecast start point; a text annotation + near the vertical rule would strengthen the storytelling' + - Legend placed with orient='right' sits tight against the right canvas edge; consider + orient='top-right' or padding for breathing room + image_description: |- + Light render (plot-light.png): + Background: Warm off-white (#FAF8F1) — correct theme surface + Chrome: Title "timeseries-forecast-uncertainty · python · altair · anyplot.ai" in dark bold text; subtitle "Monthly Sales with 80% and 95% Confidence Intervals" in softer gray; Y-axis label "Sales (thousands USD)" and X-axis label "Date" in dark text; tick labels in INK_SOFT gray; all clearly readable + Data: Solid green (#009E73) line for historical data (2021-2023); dashed orange (#D55E00) line for forecast (2024); nested semi-transparent CI bands (opacity 0.15 outer / 0.30 inner) in orange/vermillion; dashed vertical rule at forecast start; legend in top-right with box frame + Legibility verdict: PASS + + Dark render (plot-dark.png): + Background: Warm near-black (#1A1A17) — correct theme surface + Chrome: Title and subtitle in light (#F0EFE8 / #B8B7B0) text — clearly readable against dark background; axis labels and tick labels in light color; no dark-on-dark failures observed; legend text in light tones + Data: Identical Okabe-Ito colors to light render — green historical line and orange forecast line unchanged; CI bands render as deeper brownish-orange on dark background (natural opacity blending), still showing two confidence levels distinctly; dashed vertical rule appears as medium-gray + Legibility verdict: PASS + criteria_checklist: + visual_quality: + score: 28 + max: 30 + items: + - id: VQ-01 + name: Text Legibility + score: 7 + max: 8 + passed: true + comment: Font sizes explicitly set and readable in both themes; canvas is + 4800x2700 (1600x900 x scale=3) vs recommended 3200x1800 + - id: VQ-02 + name: No Overlap + score: 6 + max: 6 + passed: true + comment: No text collisions; tick labels well-spaced + - id: VQ-03 + name: Element Visibility + score: 6 + max: 6 + passed: true + comment: Historical line, dashed forecast line, and both CI bands clearly + distinguishable; opacity 0.15/0.30 appropriate + - id: VQ-04 + name: Color Accessibility + score: 2 + max: 2 + passed: true + comment: Green vs orange is CVD-safe; no red-green conflict + - id: VQ-05 + name: Layout & Canvas + score: 3 + max: 4 + passed: true + comment: Canvas deviates from recommended 800x450 x scale=4; uses 1600x900 + x scale=3 instead (4800x2700 vs 3200x1800) + - id: VQ-06 + name: Axis Labels & Title + score: 2 + max: 2 + passed: true + comment: Y-axis includes units; subtitle adds useful context + - id: VQ-07 + name: Palette Compliance + score: 2 + max: 2 + passed: true + comment: 'First series #009E73; forecast #D55E00; backgrounds #FAF8F1/#1A1A17; + theme chrome adapts correctly' + design_excellence: + score: 12 + max: 20 + items: + - id: DE-01 + name: Aesthetic Sophistication + score: 5 + max: 8 + passed: true + comment: Professional execution with correct palette and transparency; standard + forecast chart composition without standout creative choices + - id: DE-02 + name: Visual Refinement + score: 4 + max: 6 + passed: true + comment: domain=False, tickSize=0, stroke=None, y-axis-only grid at opacity=0.10; + good refinement + - id: DE-03 + name: Data Storytelling + score: 3 + max: 6 + passed: false + comment: 'Widening CI bands communicate growing uncertainty; vertical rule + marks transition. Missing: no annotation at forecast start point' + spec_compliance: + score: 15 + max: 15 + items: + - id: SC-01 + name: Plot Type + score: 5 + max: 5 + passed: true + comment: Time series line with forecast and uncertainty bands + - id: SC-02 + name: Required Features + score: 4 + max: 4 + passed: true + comment: Solid historical line, dashed forecast, vertical rule, nested 80%+95% + CI bands, legend + - id: SC-03 + name: Data Mapping + score: 3 + max: 3 + passed: true + comment: Date on X (temporal), sales on Y (quantitative); all 48 points visible + - id: SC-04 + name: Title & Legend + score: 3 + max: 3 + passed: true + comment: Exact title format; legend labels Historical Data/Forecast/80% & + 95% CI + data_quality: + score: 15 + max: 15 + items: + - id: DQ-01 + name: Feature Coverage + score: 6 + max: 6 + passed: true + comment: 'All aspects: historical trend+seasonality+noise, forecast mean, + nested CI bands, transition marker' + - id: DQ-02 + name: Realistic Context + score: 5 + max: 5 + passed: true + comment: Monthly sales with plausible upward trend and seasonality; neutral + business scenario + - id: DQ-03 + name: Appropriate Scale + score: 4 + max: 4 + passed: true + comment: 36 historical + 12 forecast points; CI widths grow realistically + over forecast horizon + code_quality: + score: 10 + max: 10 + items: + - id: CQ-01 + name: KISS Structure + score: 3 + max: 3 + passed: true + comment: No functions or classes; flat linear script + - id: CQ-02 + name: Reproducibility + score: 2 + max: 2 + passed: true + comment: np.random.seed(42) + - id: CQ-03 + name: Clean Imports + score: 2 + max: 2 + passed: true + comment: os, altair, numpy, pandas — all used + - id: CQ-04 + name: Code Elegance + score: 2 + max: 2 + passed: true + comment: Appropriate complexity; clear variable naming; no fake UI + - id: CQ-05 + name: Output & API + score: 1 + max: 1 + passed: true + comment: Saves plot-{THEME}.png and plot-{THEME}.html; current Altair 6.x + API + library_features: + score: 8 + max: 10 + items: + - id: LM-01 + name: Idiomatic Usage + score: 5 + max: 5 + passed: true + comment: alt.layer() composition; correct encoding types (T, Q); alt.value() + for colors; Y2 encoding for area bands + - id: LM-02 + name: Distinctive Features + score: 3 + max: 5 + passed: true + comment: Invisible-points legend technique for layered charts; alt.layer() + composition. Workaround rather than elegant feature use; no interactive + selection/tooltips + verdict: APPROVED +impl_tags: + dependencies: [] + techniques: + - layer-composition + - custom-legend + - html-export + patterns: + - data-generation + dataprep: + - time-series + styling: + - alpha-blending From d0c8c0704bc99bb9b6814a891e3ba254f8a56e95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "github-actions[bot]" Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 13:32:07 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] chore(altair): update quality score 88 and review feedback for timeseries-forecast-uncertainty --- .../metadata/python/altair.yaml | 156 ++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-) diff --git a/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/metadata/python/altair.yaml b/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/metadata/python/altair.yaml index 1c1d15ea5f..48ff8bccab 100644 --- a/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/metadata/python/altair.yaml +++ b/plots/timeseries-forecast-uncertainty/metadata/python/altair.yaml @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ library: altair language: python specification_id: timeseries-forecast-uncertainty created: '2026-01-07T16:29:40Z' -updated: '2026-05-19T13:22:22Z' +updated: '2026-05-19T13:32:07Z' generated_by: claude-sonnet workflow_run: 26099236924 issue: 3188 @@ -15,37 +15,39 @@ preview_html_dark: https://storage.googleapis.com/anyplot-images/plots/timeserie quality_score: 88 review: strengths: - - 'Full spec compliance: all required elements (historical line, dashed forecast, - nested CI bands, vertical rule, legend) implemented correctly' - - 'Proper Okabe-Ito palette: #009E73 for historical, #D55E00 for forecast — exact - canonical order' - - 'Clean theme adaptation: all chrome tokens (INK, INK_SOFT, PAGE_BG, ELEVATED_BG) - correctly applied in both light and dark renders; no dark-on-dark failures' - - 'Good statistical realism: CI widths grow with forecast horizon (linspace 5→20 - std), matching real forecasting model behavior' - - 'Clean axis styling: domain lines removed, tick marks removed, x-axis grid disabled, - y-axis grid subtle at 0.10 opacity' - - Reproducible with np.random.seed(42) and exports both PNG and HTML + - 'All spec features present: historical solid line, dashed forecast, nested 80%/95% + CI bands, vertical dashed rule at forecast start' + - Correct Okabe-Ito palette — green (#009E73) for historical data, orange (#D55E00) + for forecast/CI + - Both light and dark renders work correctly with proper theme-adaptive chrome tokens + - 'Strong data storytelling: widening CI bands naturally communicate growing uncertainty, + vertical rule creates clear historical/forecast boundary' + - Clean Altair layer composition using alt.layer() with invisible-points legend + workaround — idiomatic Altair pattern + - Subtitle adds meaningful context ('Monthly Sales with 80% and 95% Confidence Intervals') + - 'Excellent tick/spine refinement: tickSize=0 removes tick marks, domain=False, + x-grid removed, y-grid at opacity=0.10' weaknesses: - - 'Canvas size deviates from style guide: uses width=1600, height=900, scale_factor=3.0 - (4800x2700 px) instead of recommended width=800, height=450, scale_factor=4.0 - (3200x1800 px)' - - 'DE-03 low: no annotation or callout at the forecast start point; a text annotation - near the vertical rule would strengthen the storytelling' - - Legend placed with orient='right' sits tight against the right canvas edge; consider - orient='top-right' or padding for breathing room + - Canvas size 4800x2700 (width=1600, height=900, scale_factor=3.0) exceeds the allowed + 3200x1800 target — use width=800, height=450, scale_factor=4.0 per the Altair + library guide + - Legend combines 80% and 95% CI as a single entry ('80% & 95% CI') rather than + two separate entries with different alpha swatches to visually distinguish the + two confidence levels + - configure_view uses stroke=None (no border) rather than stroke=INK_SOFT per the + Altair theme template — minor inconsistency with the style guide chrome pattern image_description: |- Light render (plot-light.png): - Background: Warm off-white (#FAF8F1) — correct theme surface - Chrome: Title "timeseries-forecast-uncertainty · python · altair · anyplot.ai" in dark bold text; subtitle "Monthly Sales with 80% and 95% Confidence Intervals" in softer gray; Y-axis label "Sales (thousands USD)" and X-axis label "Date" in dark text; tick labels in INK_SOFT gray; all clearly readable - Data: Solid green (#009E73) line for historical data (2021-2023); dashed orange (#D55E00) line for forecast (2024); nested semi-transparent CI bands (opacity 0.15 outer / 0.30 inner) in orange/vermillion; dashed vertical rule at forecast start; legend in top-right with box frame - Legibility verdict: PASS + Background: Warm off-white #FAF8F1 — confirmed, not pure white. PASS + Chrome: Title 'timeseries-forecast-uncertainty · python · altair · anyplot.ai' in dark near-black text, clearly readable. Subtitle 'Monthly Sales with 80% and 95% Confidence Intervals' in secondary (INK_SOFT) text, readable. X-axis label 'Date', Y-axis label 'Sales (thousands USD)' in dark text, both visible. Tick labels in INK_SOFT, readable at this canvas size. + Data: Historical line in #009E73 (brand green), solid, strokeWidth=3 — clearly visible from Jan 2021 to Dec 2023 showing upward trend with seasonal oscillation. Dashed orange forecast line from Jan 2024 to Dec 2024. Lighter 95% CI band (opacity=0.15 orange) surrounds the darker 80% CI band (opacity=0.30 orange) — nested structure clearly visible. Vertical dashed rule at Jan 2024 cleanly marks forecast boundary. Legend in top-right with 'Historical Data' (green), 'Forecast' (orange), '80% & 95% CI' (orange). + Legibility verdict: PASS — all text readable against the warm off-white background. Dark render (plot-dark.png): - Background: Warm near-black (#1A1A17) — correct theme surface - Chrome: Title and subtitle in light (#F0EFE8 / #B8B7B0) text — clearly readable against dark background; axis labels and tick labels in light color; no dark-on-dark failures observed; legend text in light tones - Data: Identical Okabe-Ito colors to light render — green historical line and orange forecast line unchanged; CI bands render as deeper brownish-orange on dark background (natural opacity blending), still showing two confidence levels distinctly; dashed vertical rule appears as medium-gray - Legibility verdict: PASS + Background: Warm near-black #1A1A17 — confirmed, not pure black. PASS + Chrome: Title and subtitle rendered in light-colored text (#F0EFE8) — clearly readable. Axis labels and tick labels in lighter tones (B8B7B0 range) — readable. No dark-on-dark text failures detected. Legend text light on elevated dark background (#242420) — readable. + Data: Historical line still in #009E73 (identical to light render) — vivid green clearly visible on dark background. Forecast dashed line still #D55E00 orange — visible. CI bands appear as brownish-orange fills (same hue, darker due to dark background) — the 80% band is distinguishable as a slightly more vivid inner zone within the broader 95% band. Vertical rule visible as a subtle dashed line. + Legibility verdict: PASS — all text readable against the dark background; no dark-on-dark failures observed. criteria_checklist: visual_quality: score: 28 @@ -56,49 +58,53 @@ review: score: 7 max: 8 passed: true - comment: Font sizes explicitly set and readable in both themes; canvas is - 4800x2700 (1600x900 x scale=3) vs recommended 3200x1800 + comment: 'All font sizes explicitly set; both themes fully readable. Minor: + ''Date'' x-axis label at titleFontSize=22 is slightly generous for a 4-char + label, though X/Y label balance is maintained.' - id: VQ-02 name: No Overlap score: 6 max: 6 passed: true - comment: No text collisions; tick labels well-spaced + comment: No overlapping text or data elements; legend cleanly positioned in + top-right. - id: VQ-03 name: Element Visibility score: 6 max: 6 passed: true - comment: Historical line, dashed forecast line, and both CI bands clearly - distinguishable; opacity 0.15/0.30 appropriate + comment: Historical line, forecast line, and both CI bands clearly visible; + dashed forecast line readable through transparent bands. - id: VQ-04 name: Color Accessibility score: 2 max: 2 passed: true - comment: Green vs orange is CVD-safe; no red-green conflict + comment: Green/orange Okabe-Ito pair is CVD-safe; not red-green; adequate + luminance contrast. - id: VQ-05 name: Layout & Canvas score: 3 max: 4 passed: true - comment: Canvas deviates from recommended 800x450 x scale=4; uses 1600x900 - x scale=3 instead (4800x2700 vs 3200x1800) + comment: 'Good layout and margins. Minor: canvas 4800x2700 exceeds allowed + 3200x1800 target (width=1600, height=900, scale=3.0).' - id: VQ-06 name: Axis Labels & Title score: 2 max: 2 passed: true - comment: Y-axis includes units; subtitle adds useful context + comment: '''Date'' and ''Sales (thousands USD)'' with units; correct title + format with subtitle.' - id: VQ-07 name: Palette Compliance score: 2 max: 2 passed: true - comment: 'First series #009E73; forecast #D55E00; backgrounds #FAF8F1/#1A1A17; - theme chrome adapts correctly' + comment: 'First series #009E73, second #D55E00. Backgrounds #FAF8F1 (light) + and #1A1A17 (dark). Both themes theme-correct.' design_excellence: - score: 12 + score: 13 max: 20 items: - id: DE-01 @@ -106,22 +112,24 @@ review: score: 5 max: 8 passed: true - comment: Professional execution with correct palette and transparency; standard - forecast chart composition without standout creative choices + comment: Solid professional design with intentional color hierarchy, subtitle, + and nested CI opacity layers. Clearly above configured defaults but not + publication-exceptional. - id: DE-02 name: Visual Refinement score: 4 max: 6 passed: true - comment: domain=False, tickSize=0, stroke=None, y-axis-only grid at opacity=0.10; - good refinement + comment: tickSize=0, domain=False, x-grid removed, y-grid at opacity=0.10, + view border removed — multiple refinements visible and effective. - id: DE-03 name: Data Storytelling - score: 3 + score: 4 max: 6 - passed: false - comment: 'Widening CI bands communicate growing uncertainty; vertical rule - marks transition. Missing: no annotation at forecast start point' + passed: true + comment: Vertical rule creates a strong forecast boundary narrative. Widening + CI bands communicate increasing uncertainty naturally. Green/orange distinction + guides the viewer through the historical-to-forecast story. spec_compliance: score: 15 max: 15 @@ -131,27 +139,29 @@ review: score: 5 max: 5 passed: true - comment: Time series line with forecast and uncertainty bands + comment: 'Correct: time series line with forecast and nested confidence interval + bands.' - id: SC-02 name: Required Features score: 4 max: 4 passed: true - comment: Solid historical line, dashed forecast, vertical rule, nested 80%+95% - CI bands, legend + comment: 'All spec features: solid historical line, dashed forecast, 80% CI, + 95% CI, vertical rule, semi-transparent fills, labeled legend.' - id: SC-03 name: Data Mapping score: 3 max: 3 passed: true - comment: Date on X (temporal), sales on Y (quantitative); all 48 points visible + comment: Date on x, Sales on y; both historical (2021-2024) and forecast (2024-2025) + periods visible. - id: SC-04 name: Title & Legend score: 3 max: 3 passed: true - comment: Exact title format; legend labels Historical Data/Forecast/80% & - 95% CI + comment: Title exactly 'timeseries-forecast-uncertainty · python · altair + · anyplot.ai'. Legend items correctly labeled. data_quality: score: 15 max: 15 @@ -161,22 +171,22 @@ review: score: 6 max: 6 passed: true - comment: 'All aspects: historical trend+seasonality+noise, forecast mean, - nested CI bands, transition marker' + comment: 'Shows all features: historical trend + seasonality, forecast continuation, + nested 80%/95% bands widening over time, transition marker.' - id: DQ-02 name: Realistic Context score: 5 max: 5 passed: true - comment: Monthly sales with plausible upward trend and seasonality; neutral - business scenario + comment: Monthly sales with 3-year history + 12-month forecast; realistic + business scenario, neutral content. - id: DQ-03 name: Appropriate Scale score: 4 max: 4 passed: true - comment: 36 historical + 12 forecast points; CI widths grow realistically - over forecast horizon + comment: Sales ~100-210K USD plausible; 80% CI narrower than 95% CI (statistically + correct); bands widen over forecast horizon (correct behavior). code_quality: score: 10 max: 10 @@ -186,51 +196,51 @@ review: score: 3 max: 3 passed: true - comment: No functions or classes; flat linear script + comment: 'Linear: imports → tokens → data → layers → assemble → save. No functions + or classes.' - id: CQ-02 name: Reproducibility score: 2 max: 2 passed: true - comment: np.random.seed(42) + comment: np.random.seed(42) set. - id: CQ-03 name: Clean Imports score: 2 max: 2 passed: true - comment: os, altair, numpy, pandas — all used + comment: os, altair, numpy, pandas — all used. - id: CQ-04 name: Code Elegance score: 2 max: 2 passed: true - comment: Appropriate complexity; clear variable naming; no fake UI + comment: Clean Altair layer composition, no over-engineering, no fake UI. - id: CQ-05 name: Output & API score: 1 max: 1 passed: true - comment: Saves plot-{THEME}.png and plot-{THEME}.html; current Altair 6.x - API - library_features: - score: 8 + comment: Saves plot-{THEME}.png and plot-{THEME}.html with correct naming. + library_mastery: + score: 7 max: 10 items: - id: LM-01 name: Idiomatic Usage - score: 5 + score: 4 max: 5 passed: true - comment: alt.layer() composition; correct encoding types (T, Q); alt.value() - for colors; Y2 encoding for area bands + comment: alt.layer(), alt.value(), proper :T/:Q/:N encoding types, configure_axis/view/legend + chain — strong idiomatic Altair. - id: LM-02 name: Distinctive Features score: 3 max: 5 passed: true - comment: Invisible-points legend technique for layered charts; alt.layer() - composition. Workaround rather than elegant feature use; no interactive - selection/tooltips + comment: Invisible-points legend pattern (Altair-specific workaround), y2 + encoding for area bounds, alt.layer() composition — multiple Altair-distinctive + techniques. verdict: APPROVED impl_tags: dependencies: []