Skip to content

fix: wrong Dockerfile path in docs docker-compose.yaml#3154

Open
mervivian wants to merge 1 commit into
activeloopai:mainfrom
mervivian:fix/docker-compose-dockerfile-path
Open

fix: wrong Dockerfile path in docs docker-compose.yaml#3154
mervivian wants to merge 1 commit into
activeloopai:mainfrom
mervivian:fix/docker-compose-dockerfile-path

Conversation

@mervivian
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mervivian mervivian commented May 24, 2026

Summary

The docker-compose.yaml in the docs/ directory references dockerfiles/Dockerfile as the build target, but no dockerfiles/ directory exists in the repo. The actual Dockerfile lives at docs/Dockerfile, which is docs/Dockerfile relative to the build context (.., the repo root). Running docker compose up from the docs/ directory fails immediately because Docker can't find the referenced file.

How to reproduce

  1. Clone the repo
  2. cd docs
  3. docker compose up
  4. Error: failed to solve: failed to read dockerfile: open dockerfiles/Dockerfile: no such file or directory

Test plan

  • Run docker compose up from the docs/ directory after the fix and confirm Docker finds and builds the Dockerfile successfully.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated Docker build configuration path for documentation service.

Review Change Stack

@CLAassistant
Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLAassistant commented May 24, 2026

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 24, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 9540ef44-498f-4842-98b2-adde3a71559f

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The docs service build configuration in docs/docker-compose.yaml is updated to use a local docs/Dockerfile instead of a centralized dockerfiles/Dockerfile, moving the Dockerfile reference closer to the docs directory structure.

Changes

Docker Compose Configuration

Layer / File(s) Summary
Docker Compose docs service build path
docs/docker-compose.yaml
The docs service build configuration is updated to reference dockerfile: docs/Dockerfile instead of dockerfiles/Dockerfile.

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🐰 A single line hops away so clean,
From dockerfiles to docs it's seen,
The build path now is crystal clear,
A tiny change, but right right here! 🏗️

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately identifies the main change: correcting the Dockerfile path reference in the docker-compose.yaml file for the docs service.
Description check ✅ Passed The description includes the Impact checkbox (Bug fix), a clear Summary of the problem, reproduction steps, and a test plan, covering the essential required sections.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@mervivian mervivian force-pushed the fix/docker-compose-dockerfile-path branch from bc9e981 to 17ed53f Compare May 24, 2026 15:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants