Feature request: Multiple Inserts

[techedemic]

Using MySQL as target, I can insert multiple values at once using the following syntax

INSERT INTO mytable 
(id,first_name,last_name) 
VALUES (1,'John','Doe'),
VALUES (2,'Jane','Doe'),
VALUES (3,'Donald','Trump'),

However, using the SQL parser, I can only do 1 at a time.

So, if I parse the following statement:

INSERT INTO mytable (id,first_name,last_name) VALUES (1,'John','Doe')

... I get the following result

{
  "status": true,
  "value": {
    "type": "insert",
    "into": {
      "table": "mytable",
      "alias": null,
      "expression": "mytable"
    },
    "values": [
      {
        "target": {
          "expression": "id",
          "column": "id"
        },
        "value": "1"
      },
      {
        "target": {
          "expression": "first_name",
          "column": "first_name"
        },
        "value": "'John'"
      },
      {
        "target": {
          "expression": "last_name",
          "column": "last_name"
        },
        "value": "'Doe'"
      }
    ]
  }
}

But if I parse the following statement:

INSERT INTO mytable (id,first_name,last_name) VALUES (1,'John','Doe'),(2,'Jane','Doe'), (3,'Donald','Trump')

...I get the following error

{
  "status": false,
  "index": 69,
  "expected": [
    "EOF"
  ],
  "error": "expected EOF at character 69, got '...,(2,'Jane','...'"
}

[dsferruzza]

Hi!

I thought the syntax for multiple insertions was:

INSERT INTO mytable (id,first_name,last_name) VALUES (1,'John','Doe'), (2,'Jane','Doe'), (3,'Donald','Trump')

I guess both work...

But anyway this is not currently supported by both the AST and (as a consequence) the parser :/
Support of multiple insertions might not be a big challenge but it is not something I can fix quickly either...

I currently have not enough free time and motivation to work on this (also, this project would require a big cleanup before adding new features), but I can try to provide you advice.
If this is critical to you feel free to send me an email and we can discuss options.

Have a nice day!

[techedemic]

Apologies, that was a typo on my side....I copied and pasted too eagerly there..
Your syntax is the correct one and the 'only' correct one at that.

Look, it's not a train smash, I can work around it...but I would prefer we not 'close' this request and perhaps leave it as is until you can get to it or, maybe, when I have time I'll give it a go myself an do a pull request.

Thanks for the speedy reply. I''ll edit my original post to correct the syntax