Update tool `cargo:sarif-fmt` to 0.8.0 by hash-worker[bot] · Pull Request #8748 · hashintel/hash

hash-worker · 2026-05-23T12:37:32Z

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Update	Change
cargo:sarif-fmt (source)	minor	`0.6.5` → `0.8.0`

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

psastras/sarif-rs (cargo:sarif-fmt)

`v0.8.0`: sarif-fmt 0.8.0

Compare Source

Changelog

[sarif-fmt-v0.8.0] - 2025-05-09

🚀 Features

Add feature flag to enable fallback setters for builder
(serde-sarif) Add miri converter
Add miri-sarif

🐛 Bug Fixes

Use check name for ruleId
Compile clang-tidy regex once

⚙️ Miscellaneous Tasks

Bump thiserror from 2.0.7 to 2.0.8
Bump thiserror from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9
Bump syn from 2.0.90 to 2.0.91
Bump anyhow from 1.0.94 to 1.0.95
Bump serde_json from 1.0.133 to 1.0.134
Bump quote from 1.0.37 to 1.0.38
Bump syn from 2.0.91 to 2.0.92
Bump syn from 2.0.92 to 2.0.93
Bump serde from 1.0.216 to 1.0.217
Bump syn from 2.0.93 to 2.0.94
Bump syn from 2.0.94 to 2.0.95
Bump prettyplease from 0.2.25 to 0.2.27
Bump serde_json from 1.0.134 to 1.0.135
Bump clap from 4.5.23 to 4.5.24
Bump clap from 4.5.24 to 4.5.26
Bump thiserror from 2.0.9 to 2.0.10
Bump syn from 2.0.95 to 2.0.96
Bump thiserror from 2.0.10 to 2.0.11
Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.92 to 1.0.93
Bump prettyplease from 0.2.27 to 0.2.29
Bump serde_json from 1.0.135 to 1.0.137
Bump DeterminateSystems/magic-nix-cache-action from 8 to 9
Bump clap from 4.5.26 to 4.5.27
Bump serde_json from 1.0.137 to 1.0.138
Bump syn from 2.0.96 to 2.0.98
Bump clap from 4.5.27 to 4.5.28
Bump strum from 0.26.3 to 0.27.0
Bump strum_macros from 0.26.4 to 0.27.0
Bump clap from 4.5.28 to 4.5.29
Bump strum_macros from 0.27.0 to 0.27.1
Bump clap from 4.5.29 to 4.5.30
Bump strum from 0.27.0 to 0.27.1
Bump serde_json from 1.0.138 to 1.0.139
Bump anyhow from 1.0.95 to 1.0.96
Bump serde from 1.0.217 to 1.0.218
Bump ossf/scorecard-action from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1
Bump clap from 4.5.30 to 4.5.31
Bump anyhow from 1.0.96 to 1.0.97
Bump thiserror from 2.0.11 to 2.0.12
Bump quote from 1.0.38 to 1.0.39
Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.93 to 1.0.94
Bump syn from 2.0.98 to 2.0.99
Bump serde_json from 1.0.139 to 1.0.140
Bump prettyplease from 0.2.29 to 0.2.30
Bump cargo_metadata from 0.19.1 to 0.19.2
Bump serde from 1.0.218 to 1.0.219
Bump syn from 2.0.99 to 2.0.100
Bump clap from 4.5.31 to 4.5.32
Bump quote from 1.0.39 to 1.0.40
Bump prettyplease from 0.2.30 to 0.2.31
Bump typed-builder from 0.20.0 to 0.20.1
Bump typed-builder from 0.20.1 to 0.21.0
Bump codespan-reporting from 0.11.1 to 0.12.0
Bump clap from 4.5.32 to 4.5.33
Bump clap from 4.5.33 to 4.5.34
Bump clap from 4.5.34 to 4.5.35
Bump prettyplease from 0.2.31 to 0.2.32
Bump anyhow from 1.0.97 to 1.0.98
Bump clap from 4.5.35 to 4.5.36
Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.94 to 1.0.95
Bump clap from 4.5.36 to 4.5.37
Bump DeterminateSystems/nix-installer-action from 16 to 17
Bump syn from 2.0.100 to 2.0.101
Bump duct from 0.13.7 to 1.0.0
Bump duct_sh from 0.13.7 to 1.0.0

`v0.7.0`: sarif-fmt 0.7.0

Compare Source

Changelog

[sarif-fmt-v0.7.0] - 2024-12-18

🐛 Bug Fixes

Bare enums serialize with their tags

⚙️ Miscellaneous Tasks

Bump syn from 2.0.76 to 2.0.77
Bump clap from 4.5.16 to 4.5.17
Bump serde_json from 1.0.127 to 1.0.128
Bump serde from 1.0.209 to 1.0.210
Bump anyhow from 1.0.86 to 1.0.87
Bump DeterminateSystems/nix-installer-action from 13 to 14
Bump DeterminateSystems/magic-nix-cache-action from 7 to 8
Bump anyhow from 1.0.87 to 1.0.88
Bump anyhow from 1.0.88 to 1.0.89
Bump thiserror from 1.0.63 to 1.0.64
Bump clap from 4.5.17 to 4.5.18
Bump syn from 2.0.77 to 2.0.79
Bump regex from 1.10.6 to 1.11.0
Bump clap from 4.5.18 to 4.5.19
Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.86 to 1.0.87
Bump clap from 4.5.19 to 4.5.20
Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.87 to 1.0.88
Bump serde_json from 1.0.128 to 1.0.129
Bump anyhow from 1.0.89 to 1.0.90
Bump serde_json from 1.0.129 to 1.0.130
Bump serde_json from 1.0.130 to 1.0.132
Bump prettyplease from 0.2.22 to 0.2.24
Bump anyhow from 1.0.90 to 1.0.91
Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.88 to 1.0.89
Bump thiserror from 1.0.64 to 1.0.65
Bump serde from 1.0.210 to 1.0.213
Bump syn from 2.0.82 to 2.0.83
Bump syn from 2.0.83 to 2.0.85
Bump prettyplease from 0.2.24 to 0.2.25
Bump regex from 1.11.0 to 1.11.1
Bump serde from 1.0.213 to 1.0.214
Bump thiserror from 1.0.65 to 1.0.66
Bump anyhow from 1.0.91 to 1.0.92
Bump DeterminateSystems/nix-installer-action from 14 to 15
Bump syn from 2.0.86 to 2.0.87
Bump thiserror from 1.0.66 to 1.0.68
Bump anyhow from 1.0.92 to 1.0.93
Bump thiserror from 1.0.68 to 2.0.0
Bump thiserror from 2.0.0 to 2.0.1
Bump thiserror from 2.0.1 to 2.0.3
Bump serde from 1.0.214 to 1.0.215
Bump clap from 4.5.20 to 4.5.21
Bump DeterminateSystems/nix-installer-action from 15 to 16
Bump serde_json from 1.0.132 to 1.0.133
Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.89 to 1.0.91
Bump cargo_metadata from 0.18.1 to 0.19.0
Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.91 to 1.0.92
Bump syn from 2.0.87 to 2.0.89
Bump syn from 2.0.89 to 2.0.90
Bump anyhow from 1.0.93 to 1.0.94
Bump cargo_metadata from 0.19.0 to 0.19.1
Bump thiserror from 2.0.3 to 2.0.4
Bump clap from 4.5.21 to 4.5.22
Bump clap from 4.5.22 to 4.5.23
Bump thiserror from 2.0.4 to 2.0.6
Bump serde from 1.0.215 to 1.0.216
Bump thiserror from 2.0.6 to 2.0.7

`v0.6.6`: sarif-fmt 0.6.6

Compare Source

Changelog

[sarif-fmt-v0.6.6] - 2024-09-02

📚 Documentation

Fix documentation link
Amend install instructions

⚙️ Miscellaneous Tasks

Bump clap from 4.5.13 to 4.5.14
Bump serde from 1.0.204 to 1.0.205
Bump serde_json from 1.0.122 to 1.0.124
Bump clap from 4.5.14 to 4.5.15
Bump serde from 1.0.205 to 1.0.206
Bump syn from 2.0.72 to 2.0.74
Bump serde from 1.0.206 to 1.0.207
Bump serde from 1.0.207 to 1.0.208
Bump serde_json from 1.0.124 to 1.0.125
Bump clap from 4.5.15 to 4.5.16
Bump syn from 2.0.74 to 2.0.75
Bump typed-builder from 0.19.1 to 0.20.0
Bump quote from 1.0.36 to 1.0.37
Bump serde from 1.0.208 to 1.0.209
Bump serde_json from 1.0.125 to 1.0.127
Bump syn from 2.0.75 to 2.0.76
Bump prettyplease from 0.2.20 to 0.2.22

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

Branch creation
- "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
Automerge
- "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

vercel · 2026-05-23T12:37:39Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 23, 2026 12:37pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 23, 2026 12:37pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 23, 2026 12:37pm

augmentcode · 2026-05-23T12:38:46Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the CI mise tool pin for cargo:sarif-fmt from 0.6.5 to 0.8.0.

Why: Keeps the SARIF formatting tool used in CI up to date to pick up upstream fixes and features.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

codecov · 2026-05-23T12:43:55Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.08%. Comparing base (7cd1d95) to head (90b9bea).
⚠️ Report is 57 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8748      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.08%   62.08%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1341     1341              
  Lines      135072   135072              
  Branches     5744     5744              
==========================================
- Hits        83856    83854       -2     
- Misses      50308    50310       +2     
  Partials      908      908

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.41% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.24% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-backend-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.87% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.19% <ø> (-0.04%)`	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	`67.03% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.52% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.34% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`26.38% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-store	`37.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`83.45% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`87.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`29.63% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`82.29% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`69.13% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.06% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`92.64% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.05% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed-hq · 2026-05-23T12:44:53Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

_{Comparing deps/tool/cargo-sarif-fmt-0.x (90b9bea) with main (b9ecc19)}

github-actions · 2026-05-23T13:53:28Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$25.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 178 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.613 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.382 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.778 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$38.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 288 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$20.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 135 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.305 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$26.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 145 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.029 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.99 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$12.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.968 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.354 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.288 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.076 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$4.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.403 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.212 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.753 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$3.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.226 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.201 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.63 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.33 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.409 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.413 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.20 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.135 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.336 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.110 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.555 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.505 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.45 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.751 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$2.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.044 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$37.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 162 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.712 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$76.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 351 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$41.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 161 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.941 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$46.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 322 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$52.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 348 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.587 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$39.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 162 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.382 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$425 \mathrm{ms} \pm 644 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$89.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 344 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.256 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$90.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 352 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.845 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$258 \mathrm{ms} \pm 797 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.135 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.925 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.070 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 98.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.010 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.875 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$20.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 154 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.025 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.810 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.238 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 51.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.255 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.666 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$23.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 161 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.818 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$31.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 292 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$31.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 265 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.185 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 305 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.495 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$30.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 274 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$30.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 274 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.574 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 273 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.758 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$30.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 278 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.958 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$30.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.513 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$6.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.476 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$91.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 397 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 523 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.392 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$96.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 467 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.925 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 498 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 521 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.226 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$116 \mathrm{ms} \pm 528 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.237 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$95.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 322 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.719 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 444 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.239 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$102 \mathrm{ms} \pm 421 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.354 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 428 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.918 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 374 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.930 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 327 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.506 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$117 \mathrm{ms} \pm 387 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.509 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$124 \mathrm{ms} \pm 530 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.745 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$89.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 347 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.096 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$513 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.68 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}4.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

Update tool cargo:sarif-fmt to 0.8.0

90b9bea

hash-worker Bot enabled auto-merge May 23, 2026 12:37

github-actions Bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label May 23, 2026

augmentcode Bot reviewed May 23, 2026

View reviewed changes

hash-worker Bot assigned indietyp and TimDiekmann May 23, 2026

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Update tool `cargo:sarif-fmt` to 0.8.0#8748

Update tool `cargo:sarif-fmt` to 0.8.0#8748
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/tool/cargo-sarif-fmt-0.x

hash-worker Bot commented May 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented May 23, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot commented May 23, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot left a comment

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented May 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 23, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 23, 2026

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Conversation

hash-worker Bot commented May 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Release Notes

v0.8.0: sarif-fmt 0.8.0

Changelog

[sarif-fmt-v0.8.0] - 2025-05-09

🚀 Features

🐛 Bug Fixes

⚙️ Miscellaneous Tasks

v0.7.0: sarif-fmt 0.7.0

Changelog

[sarif-fmt-v0.7.0] - 2024-12-18

🐛 Bug Fixes

⚙️ Miscellaneous Tasks

v0.6.6: sarif-fmt 0.6.6

Changelog

[sarif-fmt-v0.6.6] - 2024-09-02

📚 Documentation

⚙️ Miscellaneous Tasks

Configuration

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented May 23, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot commented May 23, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented May 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 23, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 23, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

hash-worker Bot commented May 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

`v0.8.0`: sarif-fmt 0.8.0

`v0.7.0`: sarif-fmt 0.7.0

`v0.6.6`: sarif-fmt 0.6.6

codecov Bot commented May 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading