Update tool cargo:wasm-pack to 0.14.0

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Update	Change	Pending
cargo:wasm-pack	minor	0.13.1 → 0.14.0	0.15.0

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

wasm-bindgen/wasm-pack (cargo:wasm-pack)

v0.14.0

Compare Source

• ✨ Features

  • Support arbitrary wasm targets (WASI support) - RReverser, pull/1524

    Allows building for targets other than wasm32-unknown-unknown, enabling WASI and other custom wasm targets.

  • macOS ARM (aarch64-apple-darwin) build support - kaleidawave, pull/1529

    Adds native Apple Silicon support in release builds and NPM package.

  • Allow --split-linked-modules flag for wasm-bindgen - codeart1st, pull/1443

  • Custom build profile support - rafaelbeckel, pull/1428

    Allows using custom cargo profiles via --profile.

• 🤕 Fixes

  • Fix NPM package download URL - qinyuhang, pull/1543

  • Filter build artifacts to only .wasm files - [drager], pull/1535

  • Handle undefined VERSION in installer script - BrianHung, pull/1512

  • Fix it_gets_wasm_bindgen_version test - mshroyer, pull/1509

• 🛠️ Maintenance

  • Update dependencies to latest versions - [drager], pull/1536

  • Security workflow permissions fixes - [drager]

  • Bump ring from 0.17.8 to 0.17.14 - dependabot, pull/1516

  • Bump brace-expansion from 1.1.11 to 1.1.12 in /npm - dependabot, pull/1515

  • Bump rustls from 0.23.16 to 0.23.18 - dependabot, pull/1451

  • Fix tar vulnerability (CVE-2026-23745) in npm package

    Override tar dependency to ^7.5.3 to fix arbitrary file overwrite and symlink poisoning vulnerability (GHSA-8qq5-rm4j-mr97).

  • Fix axios vulnerabilities in npm package

    Override axios dependency to ^0.30.0 to fix SSRF/credential leakage via absolute URL and XSRF-TOKEN leakage (CSRF) vulnerabilities.

• 📖 Documentation

  • Update documentation links to drager's repo - yutannihilation, pull/1513

  • Document prerequisites for webdriver tests - mshroyer, pull/1509

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

• Branch creation
  • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
• Automerge
  • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 23, 2026 12:37pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 23, 2026 12:37pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 23, 2026 12:37pm

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the mise-managed tool version for cargo:wasm-pack from 0.13.1 to 0.14.0.
Why: Keeps the repository’s WASM build tooling current, incorporating upstream fixes and new capabilities (e.g., broader target support and packaging updates).

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.83%. Comparing base (f4d2137) to head (15197a4).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8749      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.83%   62.83%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1368     1368              
  Lines      140845   140845              
  Branches     5859     5859              
==========================================
- Hits        88502    88501       -1     
- Misses      51412    51413       +1     
  Partials      931      931              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.41% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	2.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	9.63% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.87% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.18% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.52% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	26.81% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	37.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	29.63% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.17% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.53% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	81.08% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	91.58% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.06% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing deps/tool/cargo-wasm-pack-0.x (15197a4) with main (b9ecc19)}

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$26.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 205 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.240 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$13.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 95.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 329 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.605 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.272 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 157 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.923 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$27.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 133 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.123 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.588 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.162 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.458 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.331 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.858 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.556 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.745 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.102 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.583 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.794 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.366 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.106 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.309 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.580 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.741 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.198 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.061 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$44.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 153 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.794 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$83.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 355 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.404 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$49.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 208 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.121 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$51.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 356 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.605 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$63.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 286 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$46.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 189 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.829 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$416 \mathrm{ms} \pm 641 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.236 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 336 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.401 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$83.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 315 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.028 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$320 \mathrm{ms} \pm 823 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.2 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$19.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.048 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$19.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.818 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$20.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.830 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$20.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.939 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$24.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 149 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.762 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.729 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$19.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 109 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.123 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.976 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$19.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.041 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$26.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 190 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.196 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$33.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.850 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$33.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.058 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$33.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 268 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.807 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$35.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.922 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$33.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 263 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.752 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$33.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 251 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.234 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$33.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 253 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.144 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$34.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 299 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.944 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$33.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 236 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.513 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.446 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$91.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 363 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.062 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$148 \mathrm{ms} \pm 706 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.165 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$97.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 411 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.516 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$109 \mathrm{ms} \pm 554 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.045 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 578 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.184 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$124 \mathrm{ms} \pm 558 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.662 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 483 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.574 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$130 \mathrm{ms} \pm 811 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.091 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$112 \mathrm{ms} \pm 570 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.132 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$117 \mathrm{ms} \pm 417 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.497 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 625 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.142 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$117 \mathrm{ms} \pm 371 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.218 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$139 \mathrm{ms} \pm 388 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$154 \mathrm{ms} \pm 709 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$109 \mathrm{ms} \pm 407 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.682 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$575 \mathrm{ms} \pm 902 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph