The repeated public reminder comments from ldk-reviews-bot should be disabled. The bot can continue to assign reviewers or track review state if those parts are still useful, but it should stop posting recurring 🔔 Nth Reminder comments to PR timelines.
These reminders are intended to nudge stale reviews, but they have become a weak signal that adds substantial noise to PR activity. GitHub already notifies requested reviewers through native review-request notifications, while repeated public comments make it harder to notice more meaningful updates such as author responses, review feedback, CI-relevant comments, and maintainer decisions.
Evidence from a read-only GitHub API snapshot covering comments created from 2026-03-21T00:00:00Z through the snapshot collected on 2026-06-21:
ldk-reviews-bot posted 803 PR issue comments.
550 of those comments were 🔔 reminder comments.
- Reminder comments were
34.0% of all PR issue comments in the window: 550 / 1,617.
- Reminder comments slightly outnumbered human PR issue comments:
550 reminders versus 518 human comments.
- The reminders touched
77 PRs. In the same window, 293 PRs were updated and 196 PRs were created.
- The reminders generated
710 reviewer mentions, concentrated heavily on a few people: @TheBlueMatt was mentioned 333 times, @wpaulino 134 times, and @jkczyz 103 times.
21 reminders tagged bot accounts, including @ldk-claude-review-bot.
- Among
451 reminders that were followed by another reminder to the same target, 407 had no tagged-reviewer comment or review before the bot repeated itself. That is a 90.2% non-response rate before retry.
- Even using a generous conversion metric where any later tagged-reviewer comment or review counts as a response, only
13.6% of reminders had a response within one day, 30.1% within three days, and 44.9% within seven days.
Concrete examples:
- PR #4446 received
40 reminders in the three-month window, with the latest being the 48th Reminder.
- PR #4464 received
40 reminders in the window, with the latest being the 41st Reminder.
- PR #4526 received
28 reminders and remained open in the snapshot.
- PR #4602 received
17 reminders with no tagged-reviewer action recorded after the first in-window reminder.
- PR #4360 included reminder comments tagging
@ldk-claude-review-bot.
Acceptance criteria:
ldk-reviews-bot no longer posts recurring 🔔 Nth Reminder comments to PRs.
- Existing review assignment behavior is left unchanged unless it depends directly on reminder-comment posting.
- PR timelines should no longer receive repeated bot comments solely because a requested review is stale.
The repeated public reminder comments from
ldk-reviews-botshould be disabled. The bot can continue to assign reviewers or track review state if those parts are still useful, but it should stop posting recurring🔔 Nth Remindercomments to PR timelines.These reminders are intended to nudge stale reviews, but they have become a weak signal that adds substantial noise to PR activity. GitHub already notifies requested reviewers through native review-request notifications, while repeated public comments make it harder to notice more meaningful updates such as author responses, review feedback, CI-relevant comments, and maintainer decisions.
Evidence from a read-only GitHub API snapshot covering comments created from
2026-03-21T00:00:00Zthrough the snapshot collected on2026-06-21:ldk-reviews-botposted803PR issue comments.550of those comments were🔔reminder comments.34.0%of all PR issue comments in the window:550 / 1,617.550reminders versus518human comments.77PRs. In the same window,293PRs were updated and196PRs were created.710reviewer mentions, concentrated heavily on a few people:@TheBlueMattwas mentioned333times,@wpaulino134times, and@jkczyz103times.21reminders tagged bot accounts, including@ldk-claude-review-bot.451reminders that were followed by another reminder to the same target,407had no tagged-reviewer comment or review before the bot repeated itself. That is a90.2%non-response rate before retry.13.6%of reminders had a response within one day,30.1%within three days, and44.9%within seven days.Concrete examples:
40reminders in the three-month window, with the latest being the48th Reminder.40reminders in the window, with the latest being the41st Reminder.28reminders and remained open in the snapshot.17reminders with no tagged-reviewer action recorded after the first in-window reminder.@ldk-claude-review-bot.Acceptance criteria:
ldk-reviews-botno longer posts recurring🔔 Nth Remindercomments to PRs.