Skip to content

RustSec advisory for GHSA-89vp-x53w-74fx? #846

@hicksy

Description

@hicksy

Hi,

GHSA-89vp-x53w-74fx is published on GitHub but there's no matching entry
in rustsec/advisory-db, so cargo audit and cargo deny users don't see
it. Would you like me to file the RustSec counterpart? Happy to do the
work.

For context: I maintain dynoxide-rs, which transitively depends on rmcp
for its MCP HTTP transport. The DNS rebinding issue affected dynoxide
downstream, fixed in 0.9.13 via the rmcp 1.6.0 bump. I published a GHSA
for the dynoxide side (GHSA-fvh2-gm75-j4j7 / CVE-2026-42559) and filed
the matching RustSec advisory at rustsec/advisory-db#2852.

The rmcp advisory would be the same shape: a markdown file naming rmcp
as the affected crate, 1.6.0 as patched, with the existing GHSA as the
authoritative writeup. Nothing new disclosed.

If you'd rather file it yourselves, no problem - just wanted to check
before opening a PR that names rmcp.

Thanks,
Martin

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions