At some point their should also be a has_striped_fields for Variant, and probably a way to tell what position each of the non stripped items are, as currently each of these 3 variants are documented with the same inner.
enum Foo {
A(i32)
B(i32, #[doc(hidden)] i32)
C(#[doc(hidden)] i32, i32)
}but HTML gets a good representation:
The solution is probably to do what we do for structs, and store the StructType, and a Vec<Id>, such that each field of a varient gets an Item to hold the name. We also should have a num_fields, as even in that schema, you can't tell the difference between
enum Foo {
A(#[doc(hidden)] i32),
B(#[doc(hidden)]i32, #[doc(hidden)]i32)
}This also effects struct AFAIKT.
I don't think this needs to be done now. I'll file an issue for it.
Originally posted by @aDotInTheVoid in #100582 (comment)
@rustbot modify labels: +A-rustdoc-json +T-rustdoc
At some point their should also be a
has_striped_fieldsforVariant, and probably a way to tell what position each of the non stripped items are, as currently each of these 3 variants are documented with the same inner.but HTML gets a good representation:
The solution is probably to do what we do for structs, and store the
StructType, and aVec<Id>, such that each field of a varient gets anItemto hold thename. We also should have a num_fields, as even in that schema, you can't tell the difference betweenThis also effects struct AFAIKT.
I don't think this needs to be done now. I'll file an issue for it.
Originally posted by @aDotInTheVoid in #100582 (comment)
@rustbot modify labels: +A-rustdoc-json +T-rustdoc