sdmccabe.github.io/reading_group.html at master · sdmccabe/sdmccabe.github.io · GitHub

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
  <title>Lazer Lab Reading Group</title>
  <link rel="stylesheet" href="css/tufte.css">

  <meta charset="utf-8">
  <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, user-scalable=yes">
  <meta name="description" content="">
  <meta property="og:title" content="Lazer Lab Reading Group">
  <meta property="og:description" content="">
  <!-- <meta property="og:image" content="https://sdmccabe.github.io/files/netsi-pic-2.jpg"> -->
  <meta property="og:locale" content="en_US">
  <meta property="og:type" content="website">
  <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary">
  <meta property="og:url" content="https://sdmccabe.github.io/reading_group.html">
  <meta name="twitter:dnt" content="on">
  <link rel="canonical" href="https://sdmccabe.github.io/reading_group.html">
</head>

<body>
<section>
<header>
  <h1>Reading Group</h1>
</header>
<h2>Logistics</h2>
<p>The reading group meets weekly (currently: Fridays at 4pm) to discuss a paper or two. The discussion is largely unstructured; if someone has recommended a paper they may be asked to introduce it, but there is no designated discussion leader. </p>

<p>Email me (mccabe.s at northeastern dot edu) if:</p>
<ul>
  <li>you would like a calendar invite with the Zoom link</li>
  <li>you would like to suggest a paper to read</li>
  <li>you are having trouble accessing one of the papers</li>
</ul>

<h2>Spring 2024</h2>
<h3>May 3</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Costello, Thomas H., Pennycook, Gordon, & Rand, David G. (2024). Durably reducing conspiracy beliefs through dialogues with AI. <a href="https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xcwdn">https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xcwdn</a></li>
</ul>

<h3>February 16</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Hewitt, Luke, David Broockman, Alexander Coppock, Ben M. Tappin, James Slezak, Valerie Coffman, Nathaniel Lubin, and Mohammad Hamidian. Forthcoming. “How Experiments Help Campaigns Persuade Voters: Evidence from a Large Archive of Campaigns’ Own Experiments.” <em>American Political Science Review</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055423001387">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055423001387</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>February 2</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Pradel, Franziska, Jan Zilinsky, Spyros Kosmidis, and Yannis Theocharis. Forthcoming. “Toxic Speech and Limited Demand for Content Moderation on Social Media.” <em>American Political Science Review</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542300134X">https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542300134X</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h2>Fall 2023</h2>
<h3>December 1</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Appel, Ruth E., Jennifer Pan, and Margaret E. Roberts. 2023. “Partisan Conflict over Content Moderation Is More than Disagreement about Facts.” <em>Science Advances</em> 9 (44): eadg6799. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg6799">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg6799</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>November 10</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Gennaro, Gloria, and Elliott Ash. 2023. “The C-SPAN Effect: Televised Debates, Emotional Appeals, and Political Accountability.” Working Paper.</li>
</ul>

<h3>November 3</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Ibrahim, Hazem, Nouar AlDahoul, Sangjin Lee, Talal Rahwan, and Yasir Zaki. 2023. “YouTube’s Recommendation Algorithm Is Left-Leaning in the United States.” <em>PNAS Nexus</em> 2 (8): pgad264. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad264">https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad264</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>October 27</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Coppock, Alexander, Kimberly Gross, Ethan Porter, Emily Thorson, and Thomas J. Wood. 2023. “Conceptual Replication of Four Key Findings about Factual Corrections and Misinformation during the 2020 US Election: Evidence from Panel-Survey Experiments.” <em>British Journal of Political Science</em> 53 (4): 1328–41. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123422000631">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123422000631</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>October 13</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Hangartner, Dominik, Gloria Gennaro, Sary Alasiri, Nicholas Bahrich, Alexandra Bornhoft, Joseph Boucher, Buket Buse Demirci, et al. 2021. “Empathy-Based Counterspeech Can Reduce Racist Hate Speech in a Social Media Field Experiment.” <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</em> 118 (50): e2116310118. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2116310118">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2116310118</a>.</li>
  <li>Lyall, Jason, Brendan J. Nyhan, and Elsa Voytas. 2023. “Online Communitarian Appeals Increase Opposition to Violent Extremism.” Preprint. Open Science Framework. <a href="https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/w8fe2">https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/w8fe2</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>October 6</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Graham, Matthew H., and Ethan Porter. 2023. “Increasing Demand for Fact-Checking.” Working Paper. Open Science Framework. <a href="https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/wdahm">https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/wdahm</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>September 29</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Wittenberg, Chloe, Matthew A. Baum, Adam J. Berinsky, Justin De Benedictis-Kessner, and Teppei Yamamoto. Forthcoming. “Media Measurement Matters: Estimating the Persuasive Effects of Partisan Media with Survey and Behavioral Data.” <em>The Journal of Politics</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1086/724960">https://doi.org/10.1086/724960</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>September 15</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Graham, Matthew H., and Ethan Porter. 2023. “Increasing Demand for Fact-Checking.” Working Paper. Open Science Framework. <a href="https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/wdahm">https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/wdahm</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h2>Summer 2023</h2>
<h3>July 28</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Tappin, Ben M., Chloe Wittenberg, Luke B. Hewitt, Adam J. Berinsky, and David G. Rand. 2023. “Quantifying the Potential Persuasive Returns to Political Microtargeting.” Proceedings of the <em>National Academy of Sciences</em> 120 (25): e2216261120. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2216261120">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2216261120</a>.</li>
</ul>
<h3>July 21</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Enders, Adam M., Joseph E. Uscinski, Michelle I. Seelig, Casey A. Klofstad, Stefan Wuchty, John R. Funchion, Manohar N. Murthi, Kamal Premaratne, and Justin Stoler. 2023. “The Relationship Between Social Media Use and Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation.” <em>Political Behavior</em> 45 (2): 781–804. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09734-6">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09734-6</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>July 14</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Pérez, Efrén, Jessica HyunJeong Lee, and Gustavo A. Mártir Luna. 2023. “Partisans of Color: How Racialization and Polarization Shape Asian American and Latino Party ID.” Aletheia Working Paper. <a href="https://aletheia-platform.netlify.app/publication/perez_et_al_2023_partisans_of_color/">https://aletheia-platform.netlify.app/publication/perez_et_al_2023_partisans_of_color/</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>July 7</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Chan, Man-pui Sally, and Dolores Albarracín. 2023. “A Meta-Analysis of Correction Effects in Science-Relevant Misinformation.” Nature Human Behaviour, June. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01623-8">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01623-8</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>June 23</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Milli, Smitha, Micah Carroll, Sashrika Pandey, Yike Wang, and Anca D. Dragan. 2023. “Twitter’s Algorithm: Amplifying Anger, Animosity, and Affective Polarization.” arXiv. <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16941">http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16941</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>June 9</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Druckman, James N., Suji Kang, James Chu, Michael N. Stagnaro, Jan G. Voekel, Joseph S. Mernyk, Sophia L. Pink, Chrystal Redekopp, David G. Rand, and Robb Willer. 2023. “Correcting Misperceptions of Out-Partisans Decreases American Legislators’ Support for Undemocratic Practices.” <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</em> 120 (23): e2301836120. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2301836120">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2301836120</a>.</li>
  <li>Mernyk, Joseph S., Sophia L. Pink, James N. Druckman, and Robb Willer. 2022. “Correcting Inaccurate Metaperceptions Reduces Americans’ Support for Partisan Violence.” <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</em> 119 (16): e2116851119. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2116851119">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2116851119</a>. (Optional)</li>
</ul>

<h3>June 2</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Hoes, Emma, Brian Aitken, Jingwen Zhang, Tomasz Gackowski, and Magdalena Wojcieszak. 2023. “Prominent Misinformation Interventions Reduce Misperceptions but Increase Skepticism.” Preprint. PsyArXiv. <a href="https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zmpdu">https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zmpdu</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h2>Spring 2023</h2>
<h3>May 19</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Reinero, Diego A., Elizabeth Ann Harris, Steve Rathje, Annie Duke, and Jay Joseph Van Bavel. 2023. “Partisans Are More Likely to Entrench Their Beliefs in Misinformation When Political Outgroup Members Fact-Check Claims.” Preprint. PsyArXiv. <a href="https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/z4df3">https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/z4df3</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>May 12</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Hopkins, Daniel J., Yphtach Lelkes, and Samuel Wolken. 2023. “Increased Fox News Viewership Is Not Associated with Heightened Anti-Black Prejudice.” SSRN Working Paper. <a href="https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=4420947">https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=4420947</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>May 5</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Broockman, David, and Joshua Kalla. 2023. “Selective Exposure and Partisan Echo Chambers In Television News Consumption: Evidence from Linked Viewership, Administrative, and Survey Data.” Preprint. Open Science Framework. <a href="https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/b54sx">https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/b54sx</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>April 28</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Kreiss, Daniel, and Shannon C McGregor. Forthcoming. “A Review and Provocation: On Polarization and Platforms.” <em>New Media & Society</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231161880">https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231161880</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>April 21</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Bernstein, Joseph. 2021. “Bad News: Selling the Story of Disinformation.” <em>Harper's Magazine</em>. August 9, 2021. <a href="https://harpers.org/archive/2021/09/bad-news-selling-the-story-of-disinformation/">https://harpers.org/archive/2021/09/bad-news-selling-the-story-of-disinformation/</a>.</li>
  <li>Siegel, Jacob. 2023. “A Guide to Understanding the Hoax of the Century: Thirteen Ways of Looking at Disinformation.” <em>Tablet Magazine</em>. March 29, 2023. <a href="https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/guide-understanding-hoax-century-thirteen-ways-looking-disinformation">https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/guide-understanding-hoax-century-thirteen-ways-looking-disinformation</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>April 7</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Greene, Ciara, and Nora King. “Susceptibility to Cancer Misinformation: Predictors of False Belief and False Memory Formation.” Preprint. PsyArXiv, November 23, 2022. <a href="https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8czfn">https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8czfn</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>March 31</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Argyle, Lisa P., Ethan C. Busby, Nancy Fulda, Joshua R. Gubler, Christopher Rytting, and David Wingate. “Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samples.” <em>Political Analysis</em>, Forthcoming. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2023.2">https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2023.2</a>.</li>
  <li>Gilardi, Fabrizio, Meysam Alizadeh, and Maël Kubli. “ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Tasks.” arXiv, March 27, 2023. <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.15056">http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.15056</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>March 24</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Poulsen, Shannon H., Robert M. Bond, and R. Kelly Garrett. “Comparing Beliefs in Falsehoods Based on Satiric and Non-Satiric News.” <em>PLOS ONE</em> 18, no. 1 (January 19, 2023): e0278639. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278639">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278639</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>March 17</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Yang, Yunkang, Trevor Davis, and Matthew Hindman. “Visual Misinformation on Facebook.” <em>Journal of Communication</em>, February 28, 2023, jqac051. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac051">https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac051</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>March 3</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Douglas, Karen M., and Robbie M. Sutton. “What Are Conspiracy Theories? A Definitional Approach to Their Correlates, Consequences, and Communication.” <em>Annual Review of Psychology</em> 74, no. 1 (January 18, 2023): 271–98. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-031329">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-031329</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>February 24</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Petersen, Michael Bang, Mathias Osmundsen, and Kevin Arceneaux. “The 'Need for Chaos' and Motivations to Share Hostile Political Rumors.” <em>American Political Science Review</em>, Forthcoming. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422001447">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422001447</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>February 17</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Modirrousta-Galian, Ariana, and Philip Anthony Higham. “Gamified Inoculation Interventions Do Not Improve Discrimination Between True and Fake News: Reanalyzing Existing Research With Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis.” <em>Journal of Experimental Psychology: General</em>, In press. <a href="https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4bgkd">https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4bgkd</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>February 10</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Ceylan, Gizem, Ian A. Anderson, and Wendy Wood. “Sharing of Misinformation Is Habitual, Not Just Lazy or Biased.” <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</em> 120, no. 4 (January 24, 2023): e2216614120. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2216614120">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2216614120</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h2>Fall 2022</h2>
<h3>October 14</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Munyaka, Imani, Eszter Hargittai, and Elissa Redmiles. 2022. “The Misinformation Paradox: Older Adults Are Cynical about News Media, but Engage with It Anyway.” <em>Journal of Online Trust and Safety</em> 1 (4). <a href="https://doi.org/10.54501/jots.v1i4.62">https://doi.org/10.54501/jots.v1i4.62</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>October 7</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Wojcieszak, Magdalena, Andreu Casas, Xudong Yu, Jonathan Nagler, and Joshua A. Tucker. 2022. “Most Users Do Not Follow Political Elites on Twitter; Those Who Do Show Overwhelming Preferences for Ideological Congruity.” <em>Science Advances</em> 8 (39): eabn9418. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abn9418">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abn9418</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>September 30</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Rajkumar, Karthik, Guillaume Saint-Jacques, Iavor Bojinov, Erik Brynjolfsson, and Sinan Aral. 2022. “A Causal Test of the Strength of Weak Ties.” Science 377 (6612): 1304–10. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl4476<">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl4476</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>September 23</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Braley, Alia, Gabriel S. Lenz, Dhaval Adjodah, Hossein Rahnama, and Alex Pentland. 2022. “The Subversion Dilemma: Why Voters Who Cherish Democracy Participate in Democratic Backsliding.” Working Paper. Aletheia. <a href="https://aletheia-platform.netlify.app/publication/braley_et_al_2022_the_subversion_dilemma/">https://aletheia-platform.netlify.app/publication/braley_et_al_2022_the_subversion_dilemma/</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>September 16</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Barber, Michael, and John B. Holbein. 2022. “400 Million Voting Records Show Profound Racial and Geographic Disparities in Voter Turnout in the United States.” <em>PLOS ONE</em> 17 (6): e0268134. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268134">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268134</a>.</li>
  <li>Jackman, Simon, and Bradley Spahn. 2021. “Politically Invisible in America.” <em>PS: Political Science & Politics</em> 54 (4): 623–29. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521000639">https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521000639</a>.
</ul>

<h3>September 9</h3>
<ul>
  <li>DeVerna, Matthew R., Andrew M. Guess, Adam J. Berinsky, Joshua A. Tucker, and John T. Jost. Forthcoming. “Rumors in Retweet: Ideological Asymmetry in the Failure to Correct Misinformation.” <em>Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221114222">https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221114222</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h2>Summer 2022</h2>
<h3>September 2</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Roozenbeek, Jon, Sander van der Linden, Beth Goldberg, Steve Rathje, and Stephan Lewandowsky. 2022. “Psychological Inoculation Improves Resilience against Misinformation on Social Media.” <em>Science Advances</em> 8 (34): eabo6254. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abo6254">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abo6254</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>August 26</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Card, Dallas, Serina Chang, Chris Becker, Julia Mendelsohn, Rob Voigt, Leah Boustan, Ran Abramitzky, and Dan Jurafsky. 2022. “Computational Analysis of 140 Years of US Political Speeches Reveals More Positive but Increasingly Polarized Framing of Immigration.” <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</em> 119 (31): e2120510119. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120510119">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120510119</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>August 19</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Light, Nicholas, Philip M. Fernbach, Nathaniel Rabb, Mugur V. Geana, and Steven A. Sloman. 2022. “Knowledge Overconfidence Is Associated with Anti-Consensus Views on Controversial Scientific Issues.” <em>Science Advances</em> 8 (29): eabo0038. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abo0038">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abo0038</a>.</li>
  <li>Pennycook, Gordon, Bence Bago, and Jonathon McPhetres. Forthcoming. “Science Beliefs, Political Ideology, and Cognitive Sophistication.” <em>Journal of Experimental Psychology: General</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001267">https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001267</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>August 12</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Kim, Eunji, Yphtach Lelkes, and Joshua McCrain. 2022. “Measuring Dynamic Media Bias.” <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</em> 119 (32): e2202197119. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2202197119">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2202197119</a>.</li>
  <li>Tausanovitch, Chris, and Christopher Warshaw. 2017. “Estimating Candidates’ Political Orientation in a Polarized Congress.” <em>Political Analysis</em> 25 (2): 167–87. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2017.5">https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2017.5</a>.</li>
  <li>Bonica, Adam. 2014. “Mapping the Ideological Marketplace.” <em>American Journal of Political Science</em> 58 (2): 367–86. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12062">https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12062</a>. (optional)</li>
</ul>

<h3>August 5</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Henry, Emeric, Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, and Sergei Guriev. 2022. “Checking and Sharing Alt-Facts.” <em>American Economic Journal: Economic Policy</em> 14 (3): 55–86. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20210037"> https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20210037</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>July 29</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Enders, Adam, Christina Farhart, Joanne Miller, Joseph Uscinski, Kyle Saunders, and Hugo Drochon. Forthcoming. “Are Republicans and Conservatives More Likely to Believe Conspiracy Theories?” <em>Political Behavior</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09812-3">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09812-3</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>July 15</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Amarasinghe, Ashani, and Paul A. Raschky. 2022. “Competing for Attention -- The Effect of Talk Radio on Elections and Political Polarization in the US.” arXiv:2206.13675 [econ]. <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.13675"> http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.13675</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>July 8</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Santoro, Erik, and David E. Broockman. 2022. “The Promise and Pitfalls of Cross-Partisan Conversations for Reducing Affective Polarization: Evidence from Randomized Experiments.” <em>Science Advances</em> 8 (25): eabn5515. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abn5515">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abn5515</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>July 1</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Brutger, Ryan, Joshua D. Kertzer, Jonathan Renshon, Dustin Tingley, and Chagai M. Weiss. Forthcoming. “Abstraction and Detail in Experimental Design.” <em>American Journal of Political Science</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12710">https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12710</a>.</li>

</ul>

<h3>June 10</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Hamilton, Amber M., Douglas Hartmann, and Ryan Larson. 2022. “Assessing and Extending Colorblind Racism Theory Using National Survey Data.” <em>Sociology of Race and Ethnicity</em> 8 (2): 267–83. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/23326492221078304"> https://doi.org/10.1177/23326492221078304</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>June 3</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Hackenburg, Kobi, William J. Brady, and Manos Tsakiris. 2022. “Mapping Moral Language on U.S. Presidential Primary Campaigns Reveals Rhetorical Networks of Political Division and Unity.” Preprint. Open Science Framework. <a href="https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/wn5rx">https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/wn5rx</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>May 27</h3>
<ul>
    <li>Brady, William J., Julian A. Wills, John T. Jost, Joshua A. Tucker, and Jay J. Van Bavel. 2017. “Emotion Shapes the Diffusion of Moralized Content in Social Networks.” <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</em> 114 (28): 7313–18. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618923114">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618923114</a>.</li>
    <li>Burton, Jason W., Nicole Cruz, and Ulrike Hahn. 2021. “Reconsidering Evidence of Moral Contagion in Online Social Networks.” <em>Nature Human Behaviour</em> 5 (12): 1629–35. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01133-5">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01133-5</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>May 20</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Knox, Dean, Christopher Lucas, and Wendy K. Tam Cho. 2022. “Testing Causal Theories with Learned Proxies.” <em>Annual Review of Political Science</em> 25 (1): 419–41. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-111443">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-111443</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>May 13</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Mukerjee, Subhayan, Kokil Jaidka, and Yphtach Lelkes. Forthcoming. “The Political Landscape of the U.S. Twitterverse.” <em>Political Communication</em>. <a href="https://osf.io/w98ms/">https://osf.io/w98ms/</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h2>Spring 2022</h2>
<h3> April 22</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Guay, Brian, Adam J. Berinsky, Gordon Pennycook, and David G. Rand. 2022. “Examining Partisan Asymmetries in Fake News Sharing and the Efficacy of Accuracy Prompt Interventions.” Preprint. PsyArXiv. <a href="https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/y762k">https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/y762k</a>.</li>
  <li>Yang, Qi, Mohsen Mosleh, Tauhid Zaman, and David G. Rand. 2022. “Is Twitter Biased against Conservatives? The Challenge of Inferring Political Bias in a Hyper-Partisan Media Ecosystem.” Preprint. PsyArXiv. <a href="
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ay9q5">https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ay9q5</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>April 1</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Engel, Kristen, Yiqing Hua, Taixiang Zeng, and Mor Naaman. 2022. “Characterizing Reddit Participation of Users Who Engage in the QAnon Conspiracy Theories.” <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.07433">arXiv:2203.07433 [cs]</a>.</li>
  <li>Marwick, Alice, and William Clyde Partin. 2022. “Constructing Alternative Facts: Populist Expertise and the QAnon Conspiracy.” Preprint. SocArXiv. <a href="https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/ru4b8">https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/ru4b8</a>.
 </li>
</ul>

<h3>March 25</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Brandt, Mark J., and Willem W. A. Sleegers. 2021. “Evaluating Belief System Networks as a Theory of Political Belief System Dynamics.” <em>Personality and Social Psychology Review</em> 25 (2): 159–85. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868321993751">https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868321993751</a>.</li>
</ul>


<h3>March 18</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Malka, Ariel, and Mark Adelman. Forthcoming. “Expressive Survey Responding: A Closer Look at the Evidence and Its Implications for American Democracy.” <em>Perspectives on Politics</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592721004096">https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592721004096</a>.</li>
  <li>Graham, Matthew H., and Omer Yair. 2022. “Expressive Responding and Trump’s Big Lie.” Working Paper. <a href="https://m-graham.com/papers/GrahamYair_BigLie.pdf">https://m-graham.com/papers/GrahamYair_BigLie.pdf</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>March 4</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Green, Jon, Will Hobbs, Stefan McCabe, and David Lazer. 2021. “Despair or Defiance? Turnout and Online Engagement with Election Misinformation.” Working Paper. <a href="https://osf.io/f34ac/">https://osf.io/f34ac/</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>February 25</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Arechar, Antonio A., Jennifer Allen, Adam Berinsky, Rocky Cole, Ziv Epstein, Kiran Garimella, Andrew Gully, et al. 2022. “Understanding and Reducing Online Misinformation Across 16 Countries on Six Continents.” Working Paper. <em>PsyArXiv</em>. <a href="https://osf.io/a9frz">https://osf.io/a9frz</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>February 18</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Carey, John M., Andrew M. Guess, Peter J. Loewen, Eric Merkley, Brendan Nyhan, Joseph B. Phillips, and Jason Reifler. 2022. “The Ephemeral Effects of Fact-Checks on COVID-19 Misperceptions in the United States, Great Britain and Canada.” <em>Nature Human Behaviour</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01278-3">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01278-3</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>February 11</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Bhadani, Saumya, Shun Yamaya, Alessandro Flammini, Filippo Menczer, Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, and Brendan Nyhan. 2022. “Political Audience Diversity and News Reliability in Algorithmic Ranking.” <em>Nature Human Behaviour</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01276-5">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01276-5</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>February 4</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Ecker, Ullrich K. H., Stephan Lewandowsky, John Cook, Philipp Schmid, Lisa K. Fazio, Nadia Brashier, Panayiota Kendeou, Emily K. Vraga, and Michelle A. Amazeen. 2022. “The Psychological Drivers of Misinformation Belief and Its Resistance to Correction.” <em>Nature Reviews Psychology</em> 1 (1): 13–29. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y">https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y</a>.</li>
</ul>


<h3>January 28</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Nkonde, Mutale, Maria Y. Rodriguez, Leonard Cortana, Joan K. Mukogosi, Shakira King, Ray Serrato, Natalie Martinez, Mary Drummer, Ann Lewis, and Momin M. Malik. 2021. “Disinformation Creep: ADOS and the Strategic Weaponization of Breaking News.” <em>Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review</em>, January. <a href="https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-52">https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-52</a>.</li>
 <li>HKS Misinformation Review Editorial Staff. 2021. “Retraction Note to: Disinformation Creep: ADOS and the Strategic Weaponization of Breaking News.” <em>Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review</em>, December. <a href="https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-86">https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-86</a>.</li>
 <li>Desmarais, Bruce. 2021. “Independent Review of Nkonde et al. 2021.” <a href="https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/external_independent_review.pdf">https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/external_independent_review.pdf.</a></li>
 <li>Marcus, Adam. 2021. “Harvard Journal Retracts Paper on Black Advocacy in Elections.” <em>Retraction Watch</em> (blog). December 22, 2021. <a href="https://retractionwatch.com/2021/12/22/harvard-journal-retracts-paper-on-black-advocacy-in-elections/">https://retractionwatch.com/2021/12/22/harvard-journal-retracts-paper-on-black-advocacy-in-elections/</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>January 21</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Lee, Crystal, Tanya Yang, Gabrielle D Inchoco, Graham M. Jones, and Arvind Satyanarayan. 2021. “Viral Visualizations: How Coronavirus Skeptics Use Orthodox Data Practices to Promote Unorthodox Science Online.” In <em>Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems</em>, Article No. 67. ACM Press. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445211">https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445211</a>.</li>
</ul>


<h3>January 14</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Eady, Gregory, Frederik Hjorth, and Peter Thisted Dinesen. 2021. “Do Violent Protests Affect Expressions of Party Identity? Evidence from the Capitol Insurrection.” Working Paper. <a href="https://osf.io/dvgj3/">https://osf.io/dvgj3/</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h2>Fall 2021</h2>
<h3>December 10</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Waller, Isaac, and Ashton Anderson. 2021. “Quantifying Social Organization and Political Polarization in Online Platforms.” <em>Nature</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04167-x">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04167-x</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>December 3</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Thaler, Michael. 2021. “The Fake News Effect: Experimentally Identifying Motivated Reasoning Using Trust in News.” Working Paper. <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1P5i-gS8Vr9uQTXuieIBWZORosaJbkMaH/view">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1P5i-gS8Vr9uQTXuieIBWZORosaJbkMaH/view</a>.
</li>
  <li>Thaler, Michael. 2021. “The Supply of Motivated Beliefs.” Working Paper. <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GDXmIgahq_6YzyiMPIJdik8KJlxCSlZ2/view">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GDXmIgahq_6YzyiMPIJdik8KJlxCSlZ2/view</a>.
</li>
</ul>

<h3>November 19</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Altay, Sacha, Manon Berriche, and Alberto Acerbi. 2021. “Misinformation on Misinformation: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges.” Working Paper. PsyArXiv. <a href="https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/edqc8">https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/edqc8</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>November 12</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Hill, Seth J., and Margaret E. Roberts. 2021. “Acquiescence Bias Inflates Estimates of Conspiratorial Beliefs and Political Misperceptions.” Working Paper. <a href="http://www.margaretroberts.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/hillroberts_acqbiaspoliticalbeliefs.pdf">http://www.margaretroberts.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/hillroberts_acqbiaspoliticalbeliefs.pdf</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>November 5</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Maftei, Alexandra, Andrei-Corneliu Holman, and Ioan-Alex Merlici. 2022. “Using Fake News as Means of Cyber-Bullying: The Link with Compulsive Internet Use and Online Moral Disengagement.” <em>Computers in Human Behavior</em> 127: 107032. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107032">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107032</a>.</li>
  <li>Moore-Berg, Samantha L., Boaz Hameiri, and Emile G. Bruneau. Forthcoming. “Empathy, Dehumanization, and Misperceptions: A Media Intervention Humanizes Migrants and Increases Empathy for Their Plight but Only If Misinformation About Migrants Is Also Corrected.” <em>Social Psychological and Personality Science</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211012793">https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211012793</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>October 29</h3>
<ul>
    <li>Huszár, Ferenc, Sofia Ira Ktena, Conor O’Brien, Luca Belli, Andrew Schlaikjer, and Moritz Hardt. 2021. “Algorithmic Amplification of Politics on Twitter.” arXiv:2110.11010 [cs]. <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.11010">http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.11010</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>October 22</h3>
<ul>
    <li>Chen, Wen, Diogo Pacheco, Kai-Cheng Yang, and Filippo Menczer. 2021. “Neutral Bots Probe Political Bias on Social Media.” <em>Nature Communications</em> 12 (1): 5580. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25738-6">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25738-6.</a></li>
</ul>

<h3>October 15</h3>
<ul>
    <li>Edelson, Laura, Minh-Kha Nguyen, Ian Goldstein, Oana Goga, Damon McCoy, and Tobias Lauinger. 2021. “Understanding Engagement with U.S. (Mis)Information News Sources on Facebook.” In <em>Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Internet Measurement</em>. ACM Press.</li>
</ul>

<h3>October 8</h3>
<ul>
    <li>Kuo, Rachel, and Alice Marwick. 2021. “Critical Disinformation Studies: History, Power, and Politics.” <em>Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-76">https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-76</a>.</li>
    <li>Reddi, Madhavi, Rachel Kuo, and Daniel Kreiss. 2021. “Identity Propaganda: Racial Narratives and Disinformation.” <em>New Media & Society</em>, 146144482110292. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211029293">https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211029293</a>.
</ul>

<h3> September 24</h3>
<ul>
    <li>Kim, Jin Woo, Andrew Guess, Brendan Nyhan, and Jason Reifler. Forthcoming. “The Distorting Prism of Social Media: How Self-Selection and Exposure to Incivility Fuel Online Comment Toxicity.” <em>Journal of Communication</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab034">https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab034</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3> September 17</h3>
<ul>
    <li>Kraft, Patrick W., Nicholas R. Davis, Taraleigh Davis, Amanda Heideman, Jason T. Neumeyer, and Shin Young Park. Forthcoming. “Reliable Sources? Correcting Misinformation in Polarized Media Environments.” <em>American Politics Research</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X211041570">https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X211041570</a>.</li>
    <li>Porter, Ethan, and Thomas J. Wood. 2021. “The Global Effectiveness of Fact-Checking: Evidence from Simultaneous Experiments in Argentina, Nigeria, South Africa, and the United Kingdom.” <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</em> 118 (37): e2104235118. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2104235118">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2104235118</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3> September 10</h3>
<ul>
    <li>Konitzer, Tobias, Jennifer Allen, Stephanie Eckman, Baird Howland, Markus Mobius, David Rothschild, and Duncan J Watts. Forthcoming. “Comparing Estimates of News Consumption from Survey and Passively Collected Behavioral Data.” <em>Public Opinion Quarterly</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfab023">https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfab023</a>.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Summer 2021</h2>
<h3> September 3</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Weeks, Brian E., Ericka Menchen-Trevino, Christopher Calabrese, Andreu Casas, and Magdalena Wojcieszak. Forthcoming. “Partisan Media, Untrustworthy News Sites, and Political Misperceptions.” <em>New Media & Society</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211033300">https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211033300</a>.</li>
</ul>
<h3>August 27</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Marwick, Alice E. 2021. “Morally Motivated Networked Harassment as Normative Reinforcement.” <em>Social Media + Society</em> 7 (2). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211021378">https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211021378</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>August 20</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Bor, Alexander, and Michael Bang Petersen. 2021. “The Psychology of Online Political Hostility: A Comprehensive, Cross-National Test of the Mismatch Hypothesis.” Preprint. <em>PsyArXiv</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hwb83">https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hwb83</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>August 6</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Allen, Jennifer, Markus Mobius, David Rothschild, and Duncan J. Watts. 2021. “Research Note: Examining Potential Bias in Large-Scale Censored Data.” <em>HKS Misinformation Review.</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-74">https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-74</a>.</li>
  <li>Guess, Andy, Kevin Aslett, Joshua Tucker, Richard Bonneau, and Jonathan Nagler. 2021. “Cracking Open the News Feed: Exploring What U.S. Facebook Users See and Share with Large-Scale Platform Data.” <em>Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media</em> 1. <a href="https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2021.006">https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2021.006</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>July 30</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Bode, Leticia, Emily K. Vraga, and Melissa Tully. 2020. “Do the Right Thing: Tone May Not Affect Correction of Misinformation on Social Media.” <em>Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review</em> 1 (4). <a href="https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-026">https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-026</a>.</li>
  <li>Brashier, Nadia M., Gordon Pennycook, Adam J. Berinsky, and David G. Rand. 2021. “Timing Matters When Correcting Fake News.” <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</em> 118 (5): e2020043118. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2020043118">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2020043118</a>. </li>
</ul>

<h3>July 23</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Hameleers, Michael, Toni van der Meer, and Rens Vliegenthart. Forthcoming. “Civilized Truths, Hateful Lies? Incivility and Hate Speech in False Information – Evidence from Fact-Checked Statements in the US.” <em>Information, Communication & Society</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1874038">https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1874038</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>July 16</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Garrett, R. Kelly, and Robert M. Bond. 2021. “Conservatives’ Susceptibility to Political Misperceptions.” <em>Science Advances</em> 7 (23): eabf1234. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf1234">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf1234</a>.</li>
  <li>Ryan, Timothy J., and Amanda R. Aziz. 2021. “Is the Political Right More Credulous? Experimental Evidence against Asymmetric Motivations to Believe False Political Information.” <em>The Journal of Politics</em> 83 (3): 1168–72. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1086/711133">https://doi.org/10.1086/711133</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>July 9</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Fong, Amos, Jon Roozenbeek, Danielle Goldwert, Steven Rathje, and Sander van der Linden. 2021. “The Language of Conspiracy: A Psychological Analysis of Speech Used by Conspiracy Theorists and Their Followers on Twitter.” <em>Group Processes & Intergroup Relations</em> 24 (4): 606–23. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220987596">https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220987596</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>July 2</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Mosleh, Mohsen, Cameron Martel, Dean Eckles, and David Rand. 2021. “Perverse Downstream Consequences of Debunking: Being Corrected by Another User for Posting False Political News Increases Subsequent Sharing of Low Quality, Partisan, and Toxic Content in a Twitter Field Experiment.” <em>Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems</em>. Association for Computing Machinery. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445642">https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445642</a>.</li>
  <li>Pennycook, Gordon, Ziv Epstein, Mohsen Mosleh, Antonio A. Arechar, Dean Eckles, and David G. Rand. 2021. “Shifting Attention to Accuracy Can Reduce Misinformation Online.” <em>Nature</em> 592 (7855): 590–95. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2</a>.
 </li>
</ul>

<h3>June 25</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Osmundsen, Mathias, Alexander Bor, Peter Bjerregaard Vahlstrup, Anja Bechmann, and Michael Bang Petersen. Forthcoming. “Partisan Polarization Is the Primary Psychological Motivation behind Political Fake News Sharing on Twitter.” <em>American Political Science Review</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000290">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000290</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>June 18</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Guess, Andrew M. Forthcoming. “(Almost) Everything in Moderation: New Evidence on Americans’ Online Media Diets.” <em>American Journal of Political Science</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12589">https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12589</a>.
</li>
</ul>

<h3>June 11</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Guess, Andrew M. Forthcoming. “(Almost) Everything in Moderation: New Evidence on Americans’ Online Media Diets.” <em>American Journal of Political Science</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12589">https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12589</a>. </li>
</ul>
</section>
</body>
</html>