-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 859
The Kimi K2 provider is not official and is misleading #473
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
area:providersNew provider support or provider-specific product surfaceNew provider support or provider-specific product surfaceneeds-triageNeeds maintainer triage or clearer problem framingNeeds maintainer triage or clearer problem framingpriority:mediumMedium priority: real issue or meaningful backlog itemMedium priority: real issue or meaningful backlog itemquestionFurther information is requestedFurther information is requested
Description
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
area:providersNew provider support or provider-specific product surfaceNew provider support or provider-specific product surfaceneeds-triageNeeds maintainer triage or clearer problem framingNeeds maintainer triage or clearer problem framingpriority:mediumMedium priority: real issue or meaningful backlog itemMedium priority: real issue or meaningful backlog itemquestionFurther information is requestedFurther information is requested
Source: https://github.com/steipete/CodexBar/tree/main/Sources/CodexBarCore/Providers/KimiK2
The website kimi-k2.ai is clearly not official. The official Kimi model is offered by Moonshot at moonshot.ai and moonshot.cn. Kimi for Coding is offered here.
The PR (#147) for this shows significant hallucination that suprisingly passes human review.
Another PR #146 that adds Kimi provider is correct and far more better (though outdated in billing calculation).