Skip to content

Revise user activation model #1036

@marcoscaceres

Description

@marcoscaceres

This PR brought in new user activation requirement that is a bit "unusual" (unorthodox?):
#1029

We should look at that again and figure out how to do that in a way that integrates better with the platform overall.

(for example, Screen Wake Lock allows re-requesting a lock without permission if the sticky activation was acquired via the API itself - so that achieves the no prompting requirement, while using existing infrastructure).

cc @stephenmcgruer

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions