Skip to content

Conversation

@ktf
Copy link
Member

@ktf ktf commented Dec 3, 2025

When either DomainInfoHeader or SourceInfoHeader is present, we skip their
processing. However we should complain if actual data is attached to the same
message, because it will also be skipped.

@ktf ktf requested a review from a team as a code owner December 3, 2025 10:18
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 3, 2025

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION RELEASES:
To request your PR to be included in production software, please add the corresponding labels called "async-" to your PR. Add the labels directly (if you have the permissions) or add a comment of the form (note that labels are separated by a ",")

+async-label <label1>, <label2>, !<label3> ...

This will add <label1> and <label2> and removes <label3>.

The following labels are available
async-2023-pbpb-apass4
async-2023-pp-apass4
async-2024-pp-apass1
async-2022-pp-apass7
async-2024-pp-cpass0
async-2024-PbPb-apass1
async-2024-ppRef-apass1
async-2024-PbPb-apass2
async-2023-PbPb-apass5

When either DomainInfoHeader or SourceInfoHeader is present, we skip their
processing. However we should complain if actual data is attached to the same
message, because it will also be skipped.
@ktf ktf changed the title DPL: sanity check silently skipping DataProcessingDevice DPL: sanity check silently skipping actual data Dec 3, 2025
@ktf ktf merged commit 5b0ae45 into AliceO2Group:dev Dec 3, 2025
16 of 17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant