Skip to content

AZIP-13: Barretenberg v5 Prover Optimizations#30

Open
ledwards2225 wants to merge 8 commits into
AztecProtocol:mainfrom
ledwards2225:le/azip-chonk-v5-prover-optimizations
Open

AZIP-13: Barretenberg v5 Prover Optimizations#30
ledwards2225 wants to merge 8 commits into
AztecProtocol:mainfrom
ledwards2225:le/azip-chonk-v5-prover-optimizations

Conversation

@ledwards2225
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ledwards2225 ledwards2225 commented May 13, 2026

Adds AZIP with non-exhaustive catalogue of circuit-level optimizations to the client-side and rollup proving stack shipped in v5.

@ledwards2225 ledwards2225 requested a review from a team May 13, 2026 18:15
@ledwards2225 ledwards2225 changed the title Add AZIP: Chonk v5 Prover Optimizations Add AZIP: Barretenberg v5 Prover Optimizations May 13, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@critesjosh critesjosh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good as azip 13

Comment thread AZIPs/azip-chonk-v5-prover-optimizations.md Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

rename file to include azip-13

Comment thread AZIPs/azip-chonk-v5-prover-optimizations.md Outdated
@critesjosh critesjosh changed the title Add AZIP: Barretenberg v5 Prover Optimizations AZIP-13: Barretenberg v5 Prover Optimizations May 14, 2026
Comment thread AZIPs/azip-chonk-v5-prover-optimizations.md Outdated
Comment thread AZIPs/azip-chonk-v5-prover-optimizations.md Outdated
Co-authored-by: josh crites <jc@joshcrites.com>
Co-authored-by: ledwards2225 <98505400+ledwards2225@users.noreply.github.com>
Comment thread AZIPs/azip-chonk-v5-prover-optimizations.md Outdated
Co-authored-by: ledwards2225 <98505400+ledwards2225@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants