Skip to content

SOCRadar Alerts solution v3.0.1#14522

Open
Radargoger wants to merge 3 commits into
Azure:masterfrom
Radargoger:socradar-v301
Open

SOCRadar Alerts solution v3.0.1#14522
Radargoger wants to merge 3 commits into
Azure:masterfrom
Radargoger:socradar-v301

Conversation

@Radargoger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Version bump to 3.0.1. Fixes a Content Hub install error caused by a utcNow expression in a nested template parameter default. No logic changes — version strings only.

@Radargoger Radargoger requested review from a team as code owners June 19, 2026 10:05
@Radargoger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@v-maheshbh This is a follow-up to #13858 — a small version bump to 3.0.1 that fixes a Content Hub install error caused by a utcNow expression in a nested template default. Only version strings changed; playbook logic is identical. Could you please review when you have a chance? Thank you!

@v-maheshbh v-maheshbh self-assigned this Jun 19, 2026
@v-maheshbh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi @Radargoger

image

Kindly ensure that the existing ZIP file is not deleted as part of this change. and I do not see any changes related to utcNow() in this PR.

Thanks!

@v-atulyadav v-atulyadav requested a review from Copilot June 19, 2026 11:06

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Note

Copilot was unable to run its full agentic suite in this review.

Bumps the SOCRadar solution version to 3.0.1 and updates release notes to reflect the new release.

Changes:

  • Added 3.0.1 entry to SOCRadar release notes
  • Updated solution version strings from 3.0.0 to 3.0.1 in the main template and solution metadata

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
Solutions/SOCRadar/ReleaseNotes.md Adds a 3.0.1 release note entry describing the reported deployment fix.
Solutions/SOCRadar/Package/mainTemplate.json Updates _solutionVersion and properties.version to 3.0.1.
Solutions/SOCRadar/Data/Solution_SOCRadar.json Updates the solution metadata Version to 3.0.1.

Comment thread Solutions/SOCRadar/Package/mainTemplate.json
@Radargoger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi @Radargoger

image Kindly ensure that the existing ZIP file is not deleted as part of this change. and I do not see any changes related to utcNow() in this PR.

Thanks!

Thanks for the review!

The existing 3.0.0.zip has been restored in the latest commit, so no package is removed — both 3.0.0.zip and 3.0.1.zip are now present.
Regarding utcNow: the template-level fix is already part of the merged solution (#13858) — in mainTemplate.json the inner playbook templates reference parameters('triggerStartTime') and there is no utcNow in any inner parameter default. This PR is therefore a version bump (3.0.0 → 3.0.1) to align the GitHub solution version with the package being resubmitted for certification, as required by the version-match rule. No template/logic change is expected in this diff.

@Radargoger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks for the review!

  • The existing 3.0.0.zip has been restored in the latest commits, so no package is removed — both 3.0.0.zip and 3.0.1.zip are now present in the Package folder.
  • Regarding utcNow: the template-level fix is already part of the merged solution (SOCRadar: Add SOCRadar Solution V1.0.0 #13858) — in mainTemplate.json the inner playbook templates reference parameters('triggerStartTime') and there is no utcNow in any inner parameter default. This PR is therefore a version bump (3.0.0 → 3.0.1) to align the GitHub solution version with the package being resubmitted for certification, as required by the version-match rule. No template/logic change is expected in this diff. I have also updated the 3.0.1 release note to reflect this.

@Radargoger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thank you for your support! @v-maheshbh we updated based on your feedback!!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants