Refactor if/else statements to use guard clauses for improved readability#206
Open
Refactor if/else statements to use guard clauses for improved readability#206
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
@cubap 👋 This repository doesn't have Copilot instructions. With Copilot instructions, I can understand the repository better, work faster and produce higher quality PRs. I can generate a .github/copilot-instructions.md file for you automatically. Click here to open a pre-filled issue and assign it to me. I'll write the instructions, and then tag you for review. |
Co-authored-by: cubap <1119165+cubap@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: cubap <1119165+cubap@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] reduce if/else
Refactor if/else statements to use guard clauses for improved readability
Aug 18, 2025
cubap
approved these changes
Aug 18, 2025
Member
cubap
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Perfect. I would love to see the same treatment across the board for all our routes in another issue/PR.
cubap
approved these changes
Aug 18, 2025
Member
cubap
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Perfect. I would love to see the same treatment across the board for all our routes in another issue/PR.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR refactors if/else statements to use guard clauses where efficient and clear, reducing code nesting and improving readability.
Changes Made
Route Files - Converted the pattern
if (condition) { action } else { error }toif (!condition) { error; return } action:App Configuration - Simplified maintenance mode check:
Files Modified
routes/patchSet.jsroutes/patchUnset.jsroutes/patchUpdate.jsapp.jsThe changes follow the principle of using early returns for error conditions, reducing nesting levels and making the happy path more prominent. All other if/else patterns in the codebase were analyzed and determined to be appropriate for their specific use cases (business logic with multiple valid paths, configuration assignments, etc.).
Fixes #173.
✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.