Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade lodash from 4.17.23 to 4.18.1#3315

Open
codecademydev wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
snyk-fix-38d13779b9d07510b42bcf69a31c2bc7
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade lodash from 4.17.23 to 4.18.1#3315
codecademydev wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
snyk-fix-38d13779b9d07510b42bcf69a31c2bc7

Conversation

@codecademydev
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the yarn dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • package.json

Note for zero-installs users

If you are using the Yarn feature zero-installs that was introduced in Yarn V2, note that this PR does not update the .yarn/cache/ directory meaning this code cannot be pulled and immediately developed on as one would expect for a zero-install project - you will need to run yarn to update the contents of the ./yarn/cache directory.
If you are not using zero-install you can ignore this as your flow should likely be unchanged.

⚠️ Warning
Failed to update the yarn.lock, please update manually before merging.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Arbitrary Code Injection
SNYK-JS-LODASH-15869625
  716  
medium severity Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-LODASH-15869619
  631  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Prototype Pollution
🦉 Arbitrary Code Injection

@codecademydev codecademydev requested a review from a team as a code owner April 3, 2026 07:02
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 3, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.76%. Comparing base (3b3e304) to head (98b5ed0).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3315      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.88%   89.76%   -0.12%     
==========================================
  Files         377      369       -8     
  Lines        5593     5511      -82     
  Branches     1779     1759      -20     
==========================================
- Hits         5027     4947      -80     
+ Misses        558      556       -2     
  Partials        8        8              
Flag Coverage Δ
main ?
pull-request 89.76% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 226206171a

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@LinKCoding
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Will be working off this one, will delete the other related PRs after this one is resolved in case the bot re-creates closed tix

@CLAassistant
Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLAassistant commented Apr 8, 2026

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
1 out of 2 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ LinKCoding
❌ snyk-bot
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@nx-cloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

nx-cloud bot commented Apr 13, 2026

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 98b5ed0


☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2026-04-13 14:42:55 UTC

@codecademydev
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

📬 Published Alpha Packages:

Package Version npm Diff
@codecademy/gamut 68.2.3-alpha.dd07d0.0 npm diff
@codecademy/gamut-icons 9.57.3-alpha.dd07d0.0 npm diff
@codecademy/gamut-illustrations 0.58.10-alpha.dd07d0.0 npm diff
@codecademy/gamut-kit 0.6.593-alpha.dd07d0.0 npm diff
@codecademy/gamut-patterns 0.10.29-alpha.dd07d0.0 npm diff
@codecademy/gamut-styles 17.13.2-alpha.dd07d0.0 npm diff
@codecademy/gamut-tests 5.3.4-alpha.dd07d0.0 npm diff
@codecademy/variance 0.26.2-alpha.dd07d0.0 npm diff
eslint-plugin-gamut 2.4.4-alpha.dd07d0.0 npm diff

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants