Skip to content

update agent build#23978

Open
steveny91 wants to merge 1 commit into
7.81.xfrom
sy/build-agent
Open

update agent build#23978
steveny91 wants to merge 1 commit into
7.81.xfrom
sy/build-agent

Conversation

@steveny91

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

The build agent didn't update for some reason.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 436fa99e7f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .gitlab/build_agent.yaml
trigger:
project: DataDog/datadog-agent
branch: main
branch: 7.81.x

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Restore main for non-release agent builds

In the GitLab config I checked, build-agent-auto is explicitly skipped on 7.x release branches while build-agent-manual remains the non-release/manual path, and the release-branch updater in .github/workflows/update-build-agent-yaml.yml only replaces a main template when it is run on a release branch. Changing the shared template on main means ordinary non-release dependency updates or manual builds now trigger DataDog/datadog-agent on 7.81.x instead of current main, so they can validate integrations-core changes against a stale release Agent rather than the branch they are meant to exercise.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Validation Report

Validation Description Status
qa-label Validate the pull request declares whether it needs QA for the next Agent release

Run ddev validate all changed --fix to attempt to auto-fix supported validations.

Passed validations (20)
Validation Description Status
agent-reqs Verify check versions match the Agent requirements file
ci Validate CI configuration and code coverage settings
codeowners Validate every integration has a CODEOWNERS entry
config Validate default configuration files against spec.yaml
dep Verify dependency pins are consistent and Agent-compatible
http Validate integrations use the HTTP wrapper correctly
imports Validate check imports do not use deprecated modules
integration-style Validate check code style conventions
jmx-metrics Validate JMX metrics definition files and config
labeler Validate PR labeler config matches integration directories
legacy-signature Validate no integration uses the legacy Agent check signature
license-headers Validate Python files have proper license headers
licenses Validate third-party license attribution list
metadata Validate metadata.csv metric definitions
models Validate configuration data models match spec.yaml
openmetrics Validate OpenMetrics integrations disable the metric limit
package Validate Python package metadata and naming
readmes Validate README files have required sections
saved-views Validate saved view JSON file structure and fields
version Validate version consistency between package and changelog

View full run

@datadog-prod-us1-3

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Pipelines

Fix all issues with BitsAI

⚠️ Warnings

🚦 1 Pipeline job failed

Validate repository | Run Validations / Validate   View in Datadog   GitHub Actions

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 436fa99 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants