Skip to content

docs(cloud): remove Instance Type column from Pro Tier tables#496

Merged
shahar-biron merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/pro-tier-remove-instance-col
Jun 9, 2026
Merged

docs(cloud): remove Instance Type column from Pro Tier tables#496
shahar-biron merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/pro-tier-remove-instance-col

Conversation

@dragnot

@dragnot dragnot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Remove the Instance Type column from the Pro Tier pricing tables and left-align the remaining columns for a cleaner layout.

Changes

  • Drop the Instance Type column from the Standalone table.
  • Drop the Instance Type column from the Replicated table.
  • Left-align all remaining columns (Cores, Memory, Max Graph Dataset, Hourly Cost, Monthly Cost).

Testing

Docs-only change. Verified no Instance Type references remain in cloud/pro-tier.md and table rows still align.

Memory / Performance Impact

N/A (docs-only).

Related Issues

N/A

Drop the Instance Type column from the Standalone and Replicated tables
on the Pro Tier page and left-align the remaining columns.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@dragnot, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 25 minutes and 18 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 3f41961d-9bda-4530-b1a5-7cf9c0cf5f00

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6eaeb4d and dc4be24.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • cloud/pro-tier.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/pro-tier-remove-instance-col

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

dragnot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2026
Remove the unrelated Pro Tier table edits from this PR. The Instance Type
column removal is now tracked separately in PR #496. This branch only adds
the Getting Support section to the Pro Tier page.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@dragnot

dragnot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@shahar-biron, as discussed, please approve the removal of the instance type to match the docs to SaaS

@shahar-biron shahar-biron left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sync with cloud pro view.

@shahar-biron shahar-biron merged commit 0ce7622 into main Jun 9, 2026
6 checks passed
@shahar-biron shahar-biron deleted the docs/pro-tier-remove-instance-col branch June 9, 2026 06:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants