Skip to content

Conversation

@HackingRepo
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@qodo-free-for-open-source-projects

Review Summary by Qodo

Remove OSV-Scanner workflow configuration

📦 Other

Grey Divider

Walkthroughs

Description
• Removes OSV-Scanner GitHub Actions workflow file
• Eliminates scheduled vulnerability scanning configuration
• Deletes pull request and push event-triggered security checks
Diagram
flowchart LR
  A["OSV-Scanner Workflow"] -- "deleted" --> B["Removed Configuration"]
Loading

Grey Divider

File Changes

1. .github/workflows/osv-scanner.yml ⚙️ Configuration changes +0/-36

Remove OSV-Scanner workflow configuration

• Deleted entire workflow configuration file (37 lines)
• Removed OSV-Scanner scheduled and event-triggered jobs
• Eliminated security event permissions and scan arguments

.github/workflows/osv-scanner.yml


Grey Divider

Qodo Logo

@qodo-code-review
Copy link

Review Summary by Qodo

Remove OSV-Scanner workflow configuration

📦 Other

Grey Divider

Walkthroughs

Description
• Removes OSV-Scanner GitHub Actions workflow configuration
• Deletes entire workflow file for dependency vulnerability scanning
Diagram
flowchart LR
  A["OSV-Scanner Workflow File"] -- "deleted" --> B["Removed from Repository"]
Loading

Grey Divider

File Changes

1. .github/workflows/osv-scanner.yml ⚙️ Configuration changes +0/-36

Delete OSV-Scanner workflow configuration file

• Deletes entire workflow file (37 lines removed)
• Removes scheduled and event-triggered vulnerability scanning jobs
• Eliminates OSV-Scanner action integration for push, pull request, and merge group events

.github/workflows/osv-scanner.yml


Grey Divider

Qodo Logo

@HackingRepo HackingRepo merged commit 95f5b08 into main Feb 10, 2026
12 of 14 checks passed
@HackingRepo HackingRepo deleted the HackingRepo-patch-2 branch February 10, 2026 13:00
@codacy-production
Copy link

Codacy's Analysis Summary

0 new issue (≤ 0 issue)
0 new security issue

Review Pull Request in Codacy →

AI Reviewer available: add the codacy-review label to get contextual insights without leaving GitHub.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Contributor

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 10, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 37 untouched benchmarks


Comparing HackingRepo-patch-2 (1f792ac) with main (4129acf)

Open in CodSpeed

@qodo-free-for-open-source-projects

Persistent review updated to latest commit 1f792ac

@@ -1,37 +1 @@
name: OSV-Scanner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Action required

1. Empty osv workflow 🐞 Bug ⛨ Security

.github/workflows/osv-scanner.yml is now empty, so OSV-Scanner will not run anymore (and the
workflow file may be considered invalid by GitHub Actions). This removes an existing security
control from PR/push/scheduled CI.
Agent Prompt
## Issue description
The OSV scanner workflow file is empty, so the OSV scan will not run.

## Issue Context
This PR removed all prior workflow configuration from `.github/workflows/osv-scanner.yml`. An empty workflow file disables the scan and may be treated as invalid by GitHub Actions.

## Fix Focus Areas
- .github/workflows/osv-scanner.yml[1-1]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools

@qodo-code-review
Copy link

Persistent review updated to latest commit 1f792ac

@@ -1,37 +1 @@
name: OSV-Scanner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Action required

1. Invalid empty workflow 🐞 Bug ⛯ Reliability

The OSV workflow file now contains only a blank line (no name, on, or jobs), which is likely
an invalid GitHub Actions workflow and can create persistent “invalid workflow” noise/confusion in
the repo’s Actions configuration. If the intent was to remove OSV scanning, the file should be
deleted rather than left empty.
Agent Prompt
### Issue description
`.github/workflows/osv-scanner.yml` is currently empty. An empty file in `.github/workflows/` is at best dead configuration and at worst an invalid workflow that produces GitHub Actions configuration errors/noise.

### Issue Context
The PR removed the full OSV-Scanner workflow content but left the file present with a single blank line.

### Fix Focus Areas
- .github/workflows/osv-scanner.yml[1-1]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools

@@ -1,37 +1 @@
name: OSV-Scanner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Action required

2. Dependency scan coverage regression 🐞 Bug ⛨ Security

The PR removes the OSV-Scanner workflow that previously ran on PR/push/schedule, and the remaining
workflows don’t appear to run dependency/SCA vulnerability checks (e.g., osv-scanner, npm audit,
snyk test for open-source deps) or upload such results as SARIF. This reduces visibility into
known vulnerable dependencies compared to before.
Agent Prompt
### Issue description
The OSV-Scanner workflow has been removed, and the repo no longer appears to run a dependency/SCA vulnerability scan as part of PR/push/schedule automation.

### Issue Context
- Node CI installs dependencies but does not run an audit.
- The existing Snyk workflow runs `command: code test` (SAST), not dependency testing.
- Dependabot version updates are configured, but that does not provide an on-PR SCA scan/SARIF signal.

### Fix Focus Areas
- .github/workflows/osv-scanner.yml[1-1]
- .github/workflows/node.js.yml[4-33]
- .github/workflows/snyk-infrastructure.yml[34-42]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant