fix: updating jsDocs for understanding publicApiKey usage#123
fix: updating jsDocs for understanding publicApiKey usage#123
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the documentation for the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
jaredwray
deleted the
fix-updating-jsDocs-for-understanding-publicApiKey-usage
branch
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the JSDoc comments for the HyphenOptions type to clarify why API key properties are omitted from nested service options. The changes are a good step towards better documentation. I've added a few suggestions to further improve the clarity and precision of these comments by specifying that the keys should be provided on the HyphenOptions object, removing ambiguity from the term 'top level'.
| apiKey?: string; | ||
| /** | ||
| * Options for the Toggle service. | ||
| * Excludes `publicApiKey` as it's provided at the top level. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The phrasing Excludes... is a bit awkward as a sentence fragment. To improve clarity and remove the ambiguity of 'top level', I suggest rephrasing to directly state where the publicApiKey should be provided.
| * Excludes `publicApiKey` as it's provided at the top level. | |
| * `publicApiKey` is provided on the top-level `HyphenOptions` object. |
| toggle?: Omit<ToggleOptions, "publicApiKey">; | ||
| /** | ||
| * Options for the NetInfo service. | ||
| * Excludes `apiKey` as it's provided at the top level. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The phrasing Excludes... is a bit awkward as a sentence fragment. To improve clarity and remove the ambiguity of 'top level', I suggest rephrasing to directly state where the apiKey should be provided.
| * Excludes `apiKey` as it's provided at the top level. | |
| * `apiKey` is provided on the top-level `HyphenOptions` object. |
| netInfo?: Omit<NetInfoOptions, "apiKey">; | ||
| /** | ||
| * Options for the Link service. | ||
| * Excludes `apiKey` as it's provided at the top level. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The phrasing Excludes... is a bit awkward as a sentence fragment. To improve clarity and remove the ambiguity of 'top level', I suggest rephrasing to directly state where the apiKey should be provided.
| * Excludes `apiKey` as it's provided at the top level. | |
| * `apiKey` is provided on the top-level `HyphenOptions` object. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #123 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 8 8
Lines 477 477
Branches 99 95 -4
=========================================
Hits 477 477 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
1 participant
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
fix: updating jsDocs for understanding publicApiKey usage