-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 734
COMP: Move ITK Python wrapping to SWIG 4.4.1 #6484
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
hjmjohnson
wants to merge
6
commits into
InsightSoftwareConsortium:main
Choose a base branch
from
hjmjohnson:swig-4.4.1
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9e8f0c7
COMP: Support SWIG 4.4.1 multi-phase init in Python wrapping
hjmjohnson 86c13a0
COMP: Vendor SWIG 4.4.1 binaries via FetchContent with version assertion
hjmjohnson a1612d4
COMP: Use pixi-supplied SWIG 4.4.1 and CastXML for local build-python
hjmjohnson a05386e
STYLE: Remove unused swig_archive variable
hjmjohnson 94874ca
STYLE: Unify swig_cmake_version into ITK_SWIG_VERSION
hjmjohnson 0a2891b
COMP: Factor swig vendored-download mirror URLs into a helper
hjmjohnson File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@blowekamp, I did not write this code (agentic coding suggestions). In reviewing it, I don't fully understand the subtleties of the Python wrapping at this level. I am hoping that your recent work in SimpleITK makes you a good reviewer for this code.
I'm trying to get ITK in line with SimpleITK.
During the generation of this code, the "agentic code review listing of problems, agentic suggested resolution" dialogs looked reasonable to me, but I was basing the human nudging on facts presented to me that I have not studied deeply in the past.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unfortunately, this code does not look familiar to me either.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dzenanz Can you make a suggestion of who might be a good reviewer of this code?
I originally thought this was going to be a mechanical "update tarball and version numbers" enhancement, but the full implementation of the SABI support required and suggested fortifications.
I'll circle back to it soon if no one else does a careful review. I'll need to brush up on the nuances of what is happening here and research the implementation pattern. Hopefully someone else can review and confirm that the changes are correct. I'll change authorship to who-ever confirms the c++ code changes are correct 🥇 :) .
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Matt and Brad are most familiar with wrapping internals.