Skip to content

Conversation

@ildyria
Copy link
Member

@ildyria ildyria commented Dec 12, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Fixed a Minor Reflected SSRF issue addressing an uncovered edge case.
  • New Features

    • Added an expert configuration option to disable redirects when importing from a URL.
  • Documentation

    • Added v6.10.4 release notes (Dec 11, 2025), updated announcement links and full changelog link.
  • Acknowledgements

    • Reporters of the issue have been credited.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 12, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds a v6.10.4 release entry to the changelog describing a Minor Reflected SSRF fix and updates the announcement widget to reference v6.10.4.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Release Documentation
docs/releases.md
Added v6.10.4 release entry dated Dec 11, 2025, documenting a "Minor Reflected SSRF fix", expert-config note about disabling redirects when importing from URL, credits to reporters, a "Most notable changes" item, and a full changelog link.
Announcement Component
src/components/widgets/Announcement.astro
Bumped visible and commented version references from v6.10.3 to v6.10.4 (updated href URLs and display text).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • Small, localized textual changes across two files.
  • Pay attention to the exact wording and links in docs/releases.md and the href/display text consistency in Announcement.astro.

Poem

🐇 A little rabbit hops with glee,
v6.10.4 now on the tree,
SSRF edges tucked away,
Notes and banner updated today,
Hooray for tiny fixes — whee! ✨

Pre-merge checks

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/widgets/Announcement.astro (1)

12-15: Release link update looks correct; consider consistent external-link behavior.
The updated tag URL and text match v6.10.4. If you intend external GitHub links to open in a new tab (like the stars badge link does), consider adding target="_blank" + rel="noopener" here too for consistency.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3cd684d and e16a18b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/releases.md (1 hunks)
  • src/components/widgets/Announcement.astro (1 hunks)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/releases.md (1)

39-41: Minor grammar refinements needed for release note clarity (user-facing documentation).

The security section has improved since the previous review, but two small issues remain:

  1. Line 39: "We have been reported" is passive and awkward. Consider: "We were notified" or "A vulnerability was reported to us."

  2. Line 41: "...against local network etc." is informal for a security advisory. Consider: "...against local networks and similar targets" or expand the thought to be more explicit about what "etc." covers.

These are minor polish issues for a user-facing release document where clarity is important.

-We have been reported (CVE incoming) that a minor SSRF vulnerability was still present in Lychee.
+We were notified (CVE incoming) that a minor SSRF vulnerability was still present in Lychee.
-Validation is done on the initial URL; however, if the URL is redirected, the redirection target was not validated against local network etc.
+Validation is done on the initial URL; however, if the URL is redirected, the redirection target was not validated against local networks and similar internal resources.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e16a18b and 676329f.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/releases.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/releases.md (1)

33-53: Release entry is well-structured and addresses previous review feedback.

The v6.10.4 security note has incorporated most corrections from the prior review:

  • ✓ Fixed "incomming" → "incoming"
  • ✓ Fixed "as an edge cases as not considered" → "because an edge case had not been considered"
  • ✓ Improved clarity of the validation sentence

The section now reads much more clearly than the previous iteration. The format, headers, and changelog link are all correct.

@ildyria ildyria merged commit b311337 into master Dec 12, 2025
2 checks passed
@ildyria ildyria deleted the version-6.10.4 branch December 12, 2025 12:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants