Skip to content

Remove system-level outputs from storage and replace with demand component (follow-on to 631)#666

Merged
elenya-grant merged 71 commits intoNatLabRockies:developfrom
elenya-grant:storage/standalone_outputs
Apr 15, 2026
Merged

Remove system-level outputs from storage and replace with demand component (follow-on to 631)#666
elenya-grant merged 71 commits intoNatLabRockies:developfrom
elenya-grant:storage/standalone_outputs

Conversation

@elenya-grant
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@elenya-grant elenya-grant commented Apr 10, 2026

Remove system-level outputs from storage and replace with demand component (follow-on to 631)

There has been a blurry line distinguishing system-level calculations and calculations done in storage performance models. This PR builds on PR #631 to resolve Issue #521. The storage performance outputs that depend on demand have been removed and the usage of demand components in the examples is more common. The outputs removed from storage performance models are:

  • unmet_{commodity}_demand_out: demand that has not been met
  • unused_{commodity}_out: production that exceeds the demand
  • storage_{commodity}_out: charge/discharge profile

The outputs with different calculations in the storage performance models are:

  • {commodity}_out: this used to be the combined commodity out from storage and whatever was input to storage, minus any production that exceeds the demand. This is now what storage_{commodity}_out used to be
  • capacity_factor: used to be the based on the combined commodity out, now it based on the sum of the charge/discharge profile
demand_calcs demand_commodity_out

This PR helps to better distinguish the differences between individual storage performance models and "system-level" performance calculations. This PR also enables the ability for the storage demand to be distinct from the overall demand. For example, if we wanted to use a battery to try to just keep an electrolyzer system on (at 10% power), then the demand profile to the battery would be 10% of the electrolyzer capacity, whereas the demand for the demand component would be equal to the electrolyzer capacity.

Section 1: Type of Contribution

  • Feature Enhancement
    • Framework
    • New Model
    • Updated Model
    • Tools/Utilities
    • Other (please describe):
  • Bug Fix
  • Documentation Update
  • CI Changes
  • Other (please describe):

Section 2: Draft PR Checklist

  • Open draft PR
  • Describe the feature that will be added
  • Fill out TODO list steps
  • Describe requested feedback from reviewers on draft PR
  • Complete Section 7: New Model Checklist (if applicable)

TODO:

  • Get PR Update Naming Convention in Open-Loop Converter Control Strategies #631 merged in
  • Update storage_baseclass.py so that demand is only an input if using feedback control (not doing just yet)
  • make figures to show what's happening in demand components for different use-cases
    • these figures have been added to docs/demand/demand_components.md
  • add test to test_all_examples for example 13
  • update or add doc page for example 13 in controller docs

Type of Reviewer Feedback Requested (on Draft PR)

Structural feedback:

Implementation feedback:

Other feedback:

Section 3: General PR Checklist

  • PR description thoroughly describes the new feature, bug fix, etc.
  • Added tests for new functionality or bug fixes
  • Tests pass (If not, and this is expected, please elaborate in the Section 6: Test Results)
  • Documentation
    • Docstrings are up-to-date
    • Related docs/ files are up-to-date, or added when necessary
    • Documentation has been rebuilt successfully
    • Examples have been updated (if applicable)
  • CHANGELOG.md
    • At least one complete sentence has been provided to describe the changes made in this PR
    • After the above, a hyperlink has been provided to the PR using the following format:
      "A complete thought. [PR XYZ]((https://github.com/NatLabRockies/H2Integrate/pull/XYZ)", where
      XYZ should be replaced with the actual number.

Section 3: Related Issues

This would resolve Issue #521

Section 4: Impacted Areas of the Software

Section 4.1: New Files

  • examples/13_dispatch_for_electrolyzer/: new example that highlights setting the storage demand as a different value than the demand component.
  • resource_files/wind/30.6617_-101.7096_2013_wtk_v2_60min_utc_tz.csv: wind resource file for example 23
  • docs/demand/demand_demo.md: new doc page for Example 13 that highlights use of demand components.
  • docs/technology_models/storage_models_index.md: new doc page describing the inputs and output calculations of the storage performance models.

Section 4.2: Modified Files

  • h2integrate/core/h2integrate_model.py
    • create_finance_model(): Updated logic so that any model without a cost model does not have to be included in the technologies list for a finance group. Was previously hard-coded so that only combiners didn't have to be included in the technologies list.
  • h2integrate/storage/storage_baseclass.py: modified StoragePerformanceBase
    • setup(): removed outputs related to demand
    • run_storage(): removed calculations of outputs related to demand. Updated calculation of capacity factor.
  • examples/test/test_all_examples.py::test_ng_demand_example: new test for Example 23
  • examples/test/test_all_examples.py::::test_electrolyzer_demand: new test for Example 13

Examples that were updated

  • Examples that had added combiners to combine storage outputs with the input to storage: 01, 02, 03/co2_hydrogenation_doc, 09/doc, 09/oae, 30
  • Examples that had added combiners and load demand components: 12, 16, 24, 30
  • Examples that had storage models as commodity streams (required additional combiner(s) and a new load demand component): 14, 18, 19, 29

Tests that were updated

Section 5: Additional Supporting Information

Section 6: Test Results, if applicable

  • h2integrate/core/test/test_framework.py::test_system_order
  • h2integrate/core/test/test_framework.py::test_technology_connections

Section 7 (Optional): New Model Checklist

  • Model Structure:
    • Follows established naming conventions outlined in docs/developer_guide/coding_guidelines.md
    • Used attrs class to define the Config to load in attributes for the model
      • If applicable: inherit from BaseConfig or CostModelBaseConfig
    • Added: initialize() method, setup() method, compute() method
      • If applicable: inherit from CostModelBaseClass
  • Integration: Model has been properly integrated into H2Integrate
    • Added to supported_models.py
    • If a new commodity_type is added, update create_financial_model in h2integrate_model.py
  • Tests: Unit tests have been added for the new model
    • Pytest-style unit tests
    • Unit tests are in a "test" folder within the folder a new model was added to
    • If applicable add integration tests
  • Example: If applicable, a working example demonstrating the new model has been created
    • Input file comments
    • Run file comments
    • Example has been tested and runs successfully in test_all_examples.py
  • Documentation:
    • Write docstrings using the Google style
    • Model added to the main models list in docs/user_guide/model_overview.md
      • Model documentation page added to the appropriate docs/ section
      • <model_name>.md is added to the _toc.yml

elenya-grant and others added 27 commits March 26, 2026 15:17
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@jaredthomas68 jaredthomas68 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is looking really good. I only have a few simple changes requested, mostly typos in docs.

Comment thread docs/demand/demand_demo.md
Comment thread docs/demand/demand_demo.md
Comment thread docs/technology_models/storage_models_index.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/technology_models/storage_models_index.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/technology_models/storage_models_index.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/technology_models/storage_models_index.md Outdated

with subtests.test("Expected standard capacity factor"):
assert (
pytest.approx(15.416666, rel=1e-6)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like these tests, thanks for adding them!

# standard_capacity_factor is the ratio of commodity discharged to the discharge rate
total_commodity_discharged = outputs[f"storage_{self.commodity}_discharge"].sum()
outputs["standard_capacity_factor"] = total_commodity_discharged / (
outputs[f"rated_{self.commodity}_production"] * self.n_timesteps
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will need to be made time step agnostic, but we can leave as is for now.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@jaredthomas68 jaredthomas68 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pretty close. I still have a few blocking comments.

Comment thread docs/demand/demand_demo.md
Comment on lines +42 to +44
$
CF = \frac{\sum_{t=0}^{n_{time}}(\text{commodity_out})}{\text{discharge_rate}*n_{\text{time}}}
$
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think n_time is correct. I'm sorry I was not more specific.

Suggested change
$
CF = \frac{\sum_{t=0}^{n_{time}}(\text{commodity_out})}{\text{discharge_rate}*n_{\text{time}}}
$
$
CF=\frac{\sum_{t=0}^{n_{\text{time\_steps}}}(\text{commodity\_out}*dt)}{\text{discharge\_rating}*\text{total\_time}}
$

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think n_timesteps is correct. That's the variable we use in H2I so I think it makes sense as it was before.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I still disagree and would like to have the equations as I suggested. Please see my comment on the next equation.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added the dt in

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think for consistency with the rest of the doc page, that using n_timesteps and discharge_rate are more appropriate variables in this equation. I added in *dt and the \ to improve formatting for the underscores in text variables. I also don't know how the total time variable you're proposing is different than n_timesteps. Is it equal to n_timesteps*dt? (in which case, wouldn't the dt cancel out from the numerator and denominator ?)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm fine with n_timesteps*dt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

heard - done!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this version would achieve what we need

$
CF = \frac{\sum_{i=0}^{n_{\text{time\_steps}}}(\text{commodity\_out$_i$}*dt)}{\text{discharge\_rate}*n_{\text{time\_steps}}*dt}
$

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suggested switching _t to _i, but I can roll with where it is at now

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@elenya-grant elenya-grant Apr 15, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

am I right that the only difference is the $\text{commodity}_i$ (I've been using $t$ though, so I'd make it $\text{commodity}_t$) instead of $\text{commodity}$ (it'd be commodity_out instead of commodity but GitHub doesn't like the underscores)?

If so - I just pushed up that change.

Comment on lines +46 to +48
$
CF_{\text{standard}} = \frac{\sum_{t=0}^{n_{time}}(\text{storage_commodity_discharge})}{\text{discharge_rate}*n_{\text{time}}}
$
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
$
CF_{\text{standard}} = \frac{\sum_{t=0}^{n_{time}}(\text{storage_commodity_discharge})}{\text{discharge_rate}*n_{\text{time}}}
$
$
CF=\frac{\sum_{t=0}^{n_{\text{time\_steps}}}(\text{storage\_commodity\_discharge}*dt)}{\text{discharge\_rating}*\text{total\_time}}
$

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think the dt stuff in the eqn necessarily important at this time. The storage performance models are not yet flexible to non-hourly dt - so I think we can keep it as-is. These are intended to just show the differences in the CF calculations.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should write our math correctly, even if we don't have our code written properly. The dt in the code is implicit in code because the time steps are 1 hour, but dt is technically there.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

okay. I added in dt


with subtests.test("LCOE of electricity generated"):
assert pytest.approx(138.905228, rel=1e-6) == lcoe_gen
assert pytest.approx(217.53810477, rel=1e-6) == lcoe_gen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you explain why these test values changed so much?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

resource data changed, was using data with UTC timezone and now using data with local timezone. Tests pass if timezone is 0, but those resource files (for UTC timezone) aren't available in the resource_files directory

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does that mean it is different data, or just different starting point in the data?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@johnjasa johnjasa Apr 15, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@elenya-grant, tell me if I'm thinking about this wrong, but this test was introduced as part of this PR, right? This is a fully new line as part of this PR. I don't think we need to resolve the differences in test values done during the development of the PR. This just shows that the PR introduces a new test and establishes the new test value. I don't think more work is needed here in this PR.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

definitely the second one but maybe the first one too. Using local timezone resource data, the wind CF is 18.119 and PV CF is 6.5585. Using the UTC timezone resource data, the wind CF is 18.119 and the solar resource data is 26.9244. So - big change in solar resource.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@johnjasa - you're totally correct.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good, thanks for the explanation.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@jaredthomas68 jaredthomas68 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for iterating on this. I think the equations are technically correct. I made one suggestion, but non-blocking.

Comment on lines +42 to +44
$
CF = \frac{\sum_{t=0}^{n_{time}}(\text{commodity_out})}{\text{discharge_rate}*n_{\text{time}}}
$
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suggested switching _t to _i, but I can roll with where it is at now

@elenya-grant elenya-grant enabled auto-merge (squash) April 15, 2026 18:02
@elenya-grant elenya-grant merged commit 6d4caff into NatLabRockies:develop Apr 15, 2026
12 checks passed
johnjasa added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2026
* Remove old iron models (#601)

* removed temporary iron and steel models

* supported models

* update example 28 with updated models

* remove outdated files

* consolidate iron examples

* fix all the stuff I broke

* update docs and changelog

* update example name and add model names to docs

* update changelog

---------

Co-authored-by: elenya-grant <116225007+elenya-grant@users.noreply.github.com>

* update SMR energy conversion ratio and tests (#606)

* update SMR energy conversion ratio and tests

* update changelog

* docs

* minor updates to inline comments

* update usage based on hydrogen production

---------

Co-authored-by: Rob Hammond <13874373+RHammond2@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: elenya-grant <116225007+elenya-grant@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: John Jasa <john.jasa@nrel.gov>
Co-authored-by: genevievestarke <103534902+genevievestarke@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jared Thomas <jaredthomas68@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: bayc <christopher.j.bay@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: John Jasa <johnjasa11@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jared Thomas <jaredthomas68@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Martin <94018654+jmartin4u@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: jmartin4 <jonathan.martin@nrel.gov>
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Martin <94018654+jmartin4nrel@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris Bay <12664940+bayc@users.noreply.github.com>

* Break out Pyomo controller simulation code (#587)

* Breakout simulation code

* Remove duplicate code

* Fix testing

* Update doc strings and docs

* added docstring for heuristic controller config

* fixed issue that I made with the HeuristicLoadFollowingControllerConfig

* Update docs/control/pyomo_controllers.md

Co-authored-by: Jared Thomas <jaredthomas68@users.noreply.github.com>

* Make initialize_parameters() functions the same for both controllers

* Apply suggestion from @jaredthomas68

Co-authored-by: Jared Thomas <jaredthomas68@users.noreply.github.com>

* Fix doc string format

* Update h2integrate/control/control_strategies/heuristic_pyomo_controller.py

Co-authored-by: Jared Thomas <jaredthomas68@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update h2integrate/control/control_strategies/heuristic_pyomo_controller.py

Co-authored-by: Jared Thomas <jaredthomas68@users.noreply.github.com>

* Fix ruff formatting

---------

Co-authored-by: John Jasa <johnjasa11@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: elenya-grant <116225007+elenya-grant@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jared Thomas <jaredthomas68@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kbrunik <102193481+kbrunik@users.noreply.github.com>

* Bugfix in Charge/Discharge efficiency handling in `StoragePerformanceModel` (#600)

* fixed how charge and discharge rates are applied in generic_storage_pyo model

---------

Co-authored-by: John Jasa <johnjasa11@gmail.com>

* Tests for non-one battery efficiencies (#610)

* add unit tests for  openloop storage controller with non-one efficiencies

* rearrange usage of pytest.approx so the target comes second and uses approx

* update changelog:

* Sync Storage Autosizing Model and Pass-Through controller to Align with Pyomo Controllers (#608)

* updated the storage autosizing and pass through controller for new control and performance model structure

* added subtest for integration with pass through controller

* updated to use commodity_set_point instead of input-demand

* made set_demand_as_avg_commodity_in a required input parameter

* moved passthrough controller to storage subfolder

* Added minor changes that got  missed in PR 600

---------

Co-authored-by: kbrunik <102193481+kbrunik@users.noreply.github.com>

* Sync Demand Open Loop Controller and Simple Generic Storage to Align with Pyomo Controllers (#612)

* updated simple_generic_storage to simulate storage performance

* updated demand openloop controller so discharge setpoint is correct

* PySAM Marine Models (#607)

* tidal resource model and performance model

* add performance values for testing

* test power curve scaling

* marine cost model

* tidal example

* integration test

* documentation

* update docs

* small changes

* update for failing tests

* fix equation rendering

* fix segmentation fault

* add test for using default pysam config

* address reviewer feedback

* fix wind pysam

* attempt to modify file path handling for resource data

* fix path stuff

* Sync PySAM Battery and Generic Storage Pyomo Performance models with open-loop controllers (#613)

* refactored pysam battery and storage performance models to be compatible with updated open-loop controllers

* updated generic storage pyo to use pass through controller

* renamed PassThroughOpenLoopController to SimpleStorageOpenLoopController

* removed simple_generic_storage

* renamed xx_charge_fraction to xx_soc_fraction

---------

Co-authored-by: Genevieve Starke <genevieve.starke@nrel.gov>

* minor error msg and doc corrections (#618)

* CO2 Model Fixes (#617)

* units and connecting variables

* fix doc page

* catch if annual_input_energy is 0

* remove base class

* fix oae test

* failing doc test

* fix value call

* final touchs

* Bugfix: Update storage models so can use different control types per storage type (#615)

* updated logic in pysam batery and generic storage to handle multiple storage types

* added tests and bugfix in heuristic with setting efficiencies

---------

Co-authored-by: John Jasa <johnjasa11@gmail.com>

* Baseclass for Openloop Storage Control Strategies (#619)

* added openloop control storage baseclass

* Enable use of Pyomo Controllers in the Storage Autosizing Model (#621)

* updated autosizing storage model to be compatible with pyomo controllers

* renamed fixures in heuristic controller tests

* aggregated heuristic controller tests into one file

* added simple test for storage autosizing and heuristic

* renamed fixtures in optimized controller tests

* aggregated optimized control tests into one file

* updated test for heuristic controller with autosizing

* updated so simple storage autosizing can run with optimal pyomo control

* Generic cost model for converters (#622)

* added generic cost model

* added tests and updated model

* updated example 3 to use new converter model and added to supported models

* updated docstrings and input descriptions

* updated changelog

* added to model overview

* Clarified error message

---------

Co-authored-by: John Jasa <johnjasa11@gmail.com>

* Introducing multivariable commodity streams (#480)

* Working out first steps of multivariable streams

* Adding to multivariable streams work

* expanding multivariable stream definition

* Building out more of the gas combiner

* Improving example for multivariable streams

* Updating examples and merging

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: genevievestarke <103534902+genevievestarke@users.noreply.github.com>

* Many updates based on PR feedback

* Updated to mass fractions for multicommodity stream

* renamed a few multicommodity variable names

* Added helper functions for multivariable stream definitions

* Updated names throughout for multivariable streams

* Updated docs for multivariable streams

* Added commodity stream tests

* Addressing PR feedback

* Updates based on PR feedback

* Updates based on PR feedback

---------

Co-authored-by: genevievestarke <103534902+genevievestarke@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kbrunik <102193481+kbrunik@users.noreply.github.com>

* Removed some shape_by_conn calls due to OM issues (#632)

* Removed some shape_by_conn calls due to OM issues

* Moved last calls of copy_shape

* Fixing test_pipe fail

---------

Co-authored-by: jmartin4 <jonathan.martin@nrel.gov>

* Move xdsm call in H2IntegrateModel to its own method (#629)

* move xdsm creation in H2IModel to a method so user has to call it if desired instead of having it be automatic

* update changelog and docs and adjust create_xdsm logic to reflect that it is an optional call

* update docs

* update docs

* update docs for visualization

* change xdsm code cell to not execute on build

* switch pdf for png

* minor comments update in code example

* remove xdsm call

* Updated XDSM explanation link

---------

Co-authored-by: John Jasa <johnjasa11@gmail.com>

* Handling Leap Years in OpenMeteo Resource Data (#633)

* updated openmeteo resource models to handle leap day

* added resource files for leap year

* added tests for leap year resource data

* added integration w pvwatts test for leap year

* Methodized leap day handling for base class for future resource handling

---------

Co-authored-by: John Jasa <johnjasa11@gmail.com>

* Baseclass for Storage Performance Models (#624)

* added draft storage model baseclass

* updated draft storage baseclass

* added docstring to run_storage method

* minor updates to comments in storage_model_baseclass

* updated storage performance model to inherit baseclass

* fixed storage performance model and storage baseclass

* updated storage autosizing model

* updated pysam battery to use baseclass and removed battery_baseclass

* removed commented out code and simplified some docstrings

* removed unnecessary docstrings

* updated changelog

* PR review: minor personal preferences

* updated inline comment

---------

Co-authored-by: John Jasa <johnjasa11@gmail.com>

* Modified the calc tilt angle function for pysam solar (#646)

* Oxygen output from PEM electrolyzer (#642)

* added oxygen output from electrolyzer

* updated example 14 to calc LCOO

---------

Co-authored-by: John Jasa <johnjasa11@gmail.com>

* Removed remaining naming dependencies (#654)

* Removed remaining naming dependencies

* Added to changelog and fixed CI issue

* PR feedback

* Fixed schema reqs

* Update validators to allow zero values for costs for nuclear

* Bugfix: Connecting resource to multiple techs (#655)

* bugfix and added test for connecting one resource model to multiple techs

* updated changelog

* Updated test to call setup to trigger connection error

---------

Co-authored-by: John Jasa <johnjasa11@gmail.com>

* Update urls for NLR pages and github repositories (#658)

* Update urls for NLR pages and github repositories

* Updated from WISDM to NLRWindSystems org for some repos

* Updated and removed more NREL references

---------

Co-authored-by: John Jasa <johnjasa11@gmail.com>

* Enhancement/windows ci (#590)

* update installation instructions

* add windows to CI and use conda consistently for Python across OS

* merge develop and update changelog

* adopt 'extras' flag for analysis extras to correctly use optional CI

* update changelog

* reorder ci setup

* update order

* attempt python version restructure

* reinstate old python version

* update URL

* move runs-on back to below strategy

* add os to optional matrix

* reorganize the conditional for extras

* convert lists to yaml bullet lists

* skip gis-dependent tests when not installed

* update changelog

* use optional deps for all tests and add single runner for validating dependency-determined skipped tests

* reformatting

* reduce sql file access scope to functions to avoid windows errors

* downgrade temp_dir to a function scope to avoid windows access errors

* move temp examples fixture to be in main conftest, and enable repo-wide access

* add module scoped example directory copy

* apply module scoped example copy fixture to recorder tests and update

* update changelog

* update miniconda action usage

* use the example copy fixture to isolate sql access in tests for potential windows resolution

* reorganize changelog

* fix typo in parameter name

* update workflow

* remove max-parallel

* Revert "reorganize changelog"

This reverts commit 679a38d.

* add shell to all tests

* don't allow coverage upload to fail ci

* uncomment windows

* add garbage collection to help with sql file handling

* temporarily only run windows to reduce runner usage

* add sleep to see if small timeout resolves issue

* only run single test

* remove garbage collection

* fix typo

* remove manual folder removal in favor of pytest cleanup

* reinstate normal CI processes

* add file removal to avoid OpenMDAO silent failure

* temporarily only run single file on single windows runner

* fix typo

* fix typo

* move manual recorder_path deletion

* put ci back

* handle None case

* track model state using IntEnum

* add xfail for windows because of OpenMDAO improper SQL file handling for Windows

* add todo about removing manual removal

* restore accidentally deleted file

---------

Co-authored-by: John Jasa <johnjasa11@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: kbrunik <kbrunik@gmail.com>

* updated CI workflow to disable windows (#668)

* Check for extraneous or mis-categorized input parameters (#647)

* added dictionary utilities

* bugfix in setup() and added start of a test

* added fix to calling check_inputs

* fixed check_inputs

* added another check in check_inputs

* updated error messages in check_inputs and fixed example 1

* Added tests

* added another subtest to test_check_inputs

* fixed tech configs for examples

* added some inline comments

* check for requisite models and return if none

* perform check from note and collapse checking logic

* collapse user input regeneration to reduce number of loops

* remove nested looping approach

* move assert to proper context manager level

* add indent level back

* fix min combinations logic for passing tests

* flatten improperly shared parameterization checking logic

* update test to include multiple categories for improperly shared

* fix typo

* update docstring

* added handling for combined cost and performance models

* Added tech config fpath to the error messages for parameter checking

* changlog

* changed strict to True for six converter models

* reverted strict setting for electrolyzer

---------

Co-authored-by: John Jasa <johnjasa11@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hammond, Rob <13874373+RHammond2@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kbrunik <kbrunik@gmail.com>

* Update Naming Convention in Open-Loop Converter Control Strategies (#631)

* renamed outputs in converter openloop controllers

* updated tests and examples with updated naming

* added performance model outputs to the converter control strategies

* moved converter control strategies to demand folder

* removed commodity_set_point as output

* renamed demand component to be performance model instead of control strategy

* moved output calculations to shared method in baseclass
---------

Co-authored-by: kbrunik <102193481+kbrunik@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: John Jasa <johnjasa11@gmail.com>

* modified state check for setup and run (#669)

* Add interactive class hierarchy visualization to docs (#643)

* Added class hierarchy diagram

* merging

* Updated the PR template

* Changed class hierarchy embedding

* moved class hierachy

* Breaking the sphinx narrow rule

* Combined colors based on feedback

* Updated colors based on Gen's feedback

* Shifted diagram location right

* Reformatting embedding the class viz structure

* Updated dev pyproject for viz tool

---------

Co-authored-by: kbrunik <102193481+kbrunik@users.noreply.github.com>

* Standardize Feedstock Outputs (follow-on to 463) (#523)

* added capacity and price as inputs to feedstock component

* updated feedstock mdoel to have standard outputs

* added commodity_amount_units to FeedstockCostConfig

* added standard output to feedstock cost model and connected commodity_out between performance and cost model

* renamed config inputs for feedstocks

* updated ex 23 which is untested and cleaned up feedstocks.py

* minor docstring updates and added comments

* added in notes of questions for reviewers to feedstocks.py

* updated MMBtu units to MMBtu/h

* fixed iron and steel tests

* made changes to feedstock

* fixed tests

* removed unused comment

* removed shape from price input

* added integration test for feedstock integrated with finance model

* updated feedstocks.md

* changed based on reviewer feedback

* added subtests to test_feedstocks

* small changes to feedstock doc

* docs

---------

Co-authored-by: John Jasa <johnjasa11@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: kbrunik <kbrunik@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: kbrunik <102193481+kbrunik@users.noreply.github.com>

* Framework to allow for variable dt (#653)

* add draft for variable timestep framework

* Changed error wording

* switch bounds to tuple

* minor test correction

* include time-series generation functions

* add tests for variable dt and update simulation length check for non-hourly dt

* update docs

* update changelog

* update docs and doc strings

* restore develop version of utilities.py

* update dt bounds error

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Fixing tests

* Adding time step bounds to all models

* Adding time step bounds to the combiner/splitter/transporters

* Updates for tests

* Adding time step bounds to the custom paper mill performance model

* Added time step bounds to paper mill cost

---------

Co-authored-by: John Jasa <johnjasa11@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: kbrunik <102193481+kbrunik@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: John Jasa <john.jasa@nrel.gov>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* patch: Variable dt (#671)

* update dt bounds error to require `_time_step_bounds`
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
* Add time step bounds to all tech models
* Apply time step bounds check to feedstocks, transporters, and combiners
---------

Co-authored-by: John Jasa <johnjasa11@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: kbrunik <102193481+kbrunik@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: John Jasa <john.jasa@nrel.gov>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Remove system-level outputs from storage and replace with demand component (follow-on to 631) (#666)

* removed system level calcs from storage and updated most tests

* updated examples with storage but dont use storage as a commodity_stream in finances

* updated examples with storage defined as a commodity_stream for a finance subgroup

* added time_step_bounds to demand components

* added test for example 23

* added example for different demand between storage and demand component

* added demo for the demand components using example 13

* made it so demand is only input to battery performance model if using feedback control

* added standard_capacity_factor as output from storage

* added doc page for storage performance models

---------

Co-authored-by: kbrunik <102193481+kbrunik@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: John Jasa <johnjasa11@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: kbrunik <kbrunik@gmail.com>

* Updating the readme and intro doc page ahead of v0.8 release (#677)

* Updating the readme

* Updated intro.md and changelog

* Minor readme updates

* Addressing Kaitlin's comments

* Added more lingo to readme

* Addressing PR suggestions

---------

Co-authored-by: kbrunik <102193481+kbrunik@users.noreply.github.com>

* Move storage controllers into `storage` folder in `control_strategies` (#678)

* moved controllers to storage folder

* renamed pyomo controllers to include storage in the control name

* moved control strategy tests

* moved tests to the right folder

* moved pyomo baseclass and controller_opt_problem_state to top-level control_strategies

* updated import statements

* renamed pyomo baseclass file

* updated import for pyomo storage baseclass

* made storage chapter in docs

* removed backslashes from eqn since they dont render properly on readthedocs

* Making changes per Gen's suggestion (#681)

* Bump version from 0.7.2 to 0.8.0

---------

Co-authored-by: kbrunik <102193481+kbrunik@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: elenya-grant <116225007+elenya-grant@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Rob Hammond <13874373+RHammond2@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: genevievestarke <103534902+genevievestarke@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jared Thomas <jaredthomas68@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: bayc <christopher.j.bay@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jared Thomas <jaredthomas68@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Martin <94018654+jmartin4u@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: jmartin4 <jonathan.martin@nrel.gov>
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Martin <94018654+jmartin4nrel@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris Bay <12664940+bayc@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Genevieve Starke <genevieve.starke@nrel.gov>
Co-authored-by: kbrunik <kbrunik@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready for review This PR is ready for input from folks

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants