-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
Add guard rails for DataStreams that differ in-size from their reported size. #704
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
aa7534e
.
LukeButters 75d0694
.
LukeButters dbba0e2
.
LukeButters 55f408c
.
LukeButters e13d9ab
.
LukeButters 07cd30b
.
LukeButters f70ce15
.
LukeButters 72d0106
Message can be null
LukeButters 3bc86c6
.
LukeButters 83b56c1
Allow more tests to pass on mac
LukeButters 232778a
.
LukeButters f19a338
.
LukeButters 964bfac
.
LukeButters File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -104,7 +104,8 @@ public async Task BackwardsCompatibility_ExtraParametersInServerErrorAreIgnored( | |
| await using (var stream = new RewindableBufferStream(new MemoryStream(Convert.FromBase64String(base64Bson)))) | ||
| { | ||
| var result = await ReadMessage<ResponseMessage>(sut, stream); | ||
| result.Error.Should().NotBeNull(); | ||
| result.Should().NotBeNull(); | ||
| result!.Error.Should().NotBeNull(); | ||
| result.Error!.Message = "foo"; | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. In theory you might even be able to drop this null-forgiving operator too. |
||
| result.Error.HalibutErrorType = "MethodNotFoundHalibutClientException"; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
@@ -303,7 +304,7 @@ static byte[] DeflateString(string s) | |
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async Task<T> ReadMessage<T>(MessageSerializer messageSerializer, RewindableBufferStream rewindableBufferStream) | ||
| async Task<T?> ReadMessage<T>(MessageSerializer messageSerializer, RewindableBufferStream rewindableBufferStream) | ||
| { | ||
| return (await messageSerializer.ReadMessageAsync<T>(rewindableBufferStream, CancellationToken)).Message; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd prefer an assertion rather than the null-forgiving operator. It "should" give a clearer error too.
i.e.
I'm pretty sure this properly marks
resultas non-null for the analyzers (at least, I've seen it do that).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems I still need the bang so changing to: