-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
Allow routes to accept nested assets. #515
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
EmileSonneveld
wants to merge
6
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
allow_more_nested_assets
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+99
−9
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c166da4
Allow routes to accept nested assets.
EmileSonneveld c5009ff
Test double nested.
EmileSonneveld 72b4bea
Flask uses Werkzeug to resolve to a route. The signed URL gets priori…
EmileSonneveld ed035e9
Same for download_job_result_signed
EmileSonneveld 19e287f
Use try-catch to be more robust against strings that look like valid …
EmileSonneveld 9d5f3ed
CredentialsInvalidException
EmileSonneveld File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With the signed rule now using
<path:item_id>and being registered before the bearer-auth item route below, an unsigned nested item ID with three or more components (for exampletiles/2024/01.tif) matches this signed route asuser_base64=tiles,secure_key=2024,item_id=01.tifinstead of reaching the bearer-auth handler. That makes deeper nested results fail signature/base64 verification even when the caller supplies normal bearer auth; the same pattern on theitems11signed route has the same effect.Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.