[Pyomo.DoE] Add simultaneous design of multiple experiments#3866
Open
smondal13 wants to merge 136 commits intoPyomo:mainfrom
Open
[Pyomo.DoE] Add simultaneous design of multiple experiments#3866smondal13 wants to merge 136 commits intoPyomo:mainfrom
smondal13 wants to merge 136 commits intoPyomo:mainfrom
Conversation
…`experiment` argument is provided.
…d replace `self.experiment` with `self.experiment_list[0]`. `doe/reactor_example.py` runs successfully.
…sing the `doe/reactor_multi_experiment.py`
…ultiexperiment.py` both for 3 experiments
…etric-uncertainty
…parametric-uncertainty
…nt for `optimize_experiments()` and `compute_FIM()`
… both of sensitivity and optimize_experiments()
…A-opt gave different result for grid and optimization
- Updated the `DesignOfExperiments` class to accept either a single experiment or a list of experiments through the `experiment` parameter, replacing the previous `experiment_list` parameter. - Modified related test cases to reflect this change, ensuring that both single and multiple experiments are handled correctly. - Adjusted error messages and validation checks to align with the new parameter naming. - Ensured backward compatibility by updating all references in the test suite and error handling.
- Add documentation
… add-multiexperiment
- enhance documentation for init_solver usage in multi-experiment optimization
- extend optimize_experiments() to build and initialize grey-box objectives from aggregated scenario FIMs so the multi-experiment API can use the same external-metric path as run_doe(). - relax FIMExternalGreyBox initialization to accept explicit parameter ordering and dense FIM seeds so scenario-level total FIM blocks can reuse the grey-box implementation cleanly. - add DOE build, validation, and greybox solve tests to cover multi-experiment solver routing, unsupported objective checks, and expected Rooney-Biegler results.
…or parameter scenarios
…xperiment optimization
- Cleaned up the DesignOfExperiments class by simplifying reference and current finite difference blocks access. - Updated greybox initialization to streamline the process and ensure proper parameter handling. - Removed outdated tests related to pseudo_trace and other unsupported objectives, ensuring that the greybox path validation is robust. - Added new tests to validate greybox outputs against NumPy computations for all supported objectives. - Enhanced test coverage for multi-experiment scenarios, ensuring that the greybox solver is correctly utilized and that initialization behaves as expected. - Improved assertions in tests to ensure accuracy and clarity in expected outcomes.
…ine access in tests
Add Greybox to multiexperiment
…name result payload field
smondal13
commented
Mar 30, 2026
| @@ -0,0 +1,206 @@ | |||
| #### NO NEED TO CHECK THIS SCRIPT. THIS IS FOR ME TO UNDERSTAND THE RESULT AND WILL BE DELETED LATER. | |||
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
NO NEED TO REVIEW THIS SCRIPT
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes # .
Summary/Motivation:
This PR adds a new
DesignOfExperiments.optimize_experiments()API inpyomo/contrib/doe/doe.pyto support simultaneous optimization of multiple experiments in one workflow. The motivation is to provide a multi-experiment DoE interface with stronger initialization options, clearer mode handling (template vs. user-initialized experiments), and richer diagnostics/results than the existing single-experiment path.Changes proposed in this PR:
optimize_experiments()for multi-experiment DoE optimization.n_exp.n_expis inferred/validated.initialization_method="lhs") with controls for:sym_break_conssuffix,run_info._DoEResultsJSONEncoderfor numpy/Pyomo-enum values when writingresults_file.Note:
documentation.mdwhich describes the API. This documentation is to help the reviewers to understand the API and will not be merged intoPyomo:mainLegal Acknowledgement
By contributing to this software project, I have read the contribution guide and agree to the following terms and conditions for my contribution: