feat(eslint-plugin-query): add prefer-query-options rule#10359
feat(eslint-plugin-query): add prefer-query-options rule#10359
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a new ESLint rule Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 87d26cf
☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at |
🚀 Changeset Version Preview1 package(s) bumped directly, 23 bumped as dependents. 🟨 Minor bumps
🟩 Patch bumps
|
size-limit report 📦
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/eslint/prefer-query-options.md`:
- Around line 27-31: The examples (e.g., useFooQuery and the queryOptions(...)
snippets) reference id without any binding; change them into factory functions
that accept id (e.g., function useFooQuery(id) or export function
queryOptions(id)) and then pass that id into the useQuery call (or into
queryOptions(id)) so the id is in scope; update any example that builds
queryOptions(...) to be queryOptions(id) and update callers to pass the id into
useFooQuery or the options factory accordingly (references: useFooQuery,
queryOptions, options).
In
`@packages/eslint-plugin-query/src/rules/prefer-query-options/prefer-query-options.rule.ts`:
- Around line 23-30: The rule currently only flags inline options for methods in
queryClientOptionMethods but misses the newer APIs; add 'query' and
'infiniteQuery' to the queryClientOptionMethods array so inline options passed
to queryClient.query(...) and queryClient.infiniteQuery(...) are checked, and
update the test suite for this rule to include invalid cases covering query()
and infiniteQuery() (matching the existing invalid cases for
fetchQuery/fetchInfiniteQuery) so the select option behavior is asserted for
both legacy and new APIs; update any test matrix entries that reference method
names to include 'query' and 'infiniteQuery' as well.
- Around line 177-180: The rule currently checks options.type ===
AST_NODE_TYPES.ArrayExpression directly and misses TS assertion wrappers; update
the checks inside the prefer-query-options rule where queryClientQueryKeyMethods
is handled (and inside hasInlineFilterQueryKey) to first unwrap TypeScript
assertion nodes using the existing helper dereferenceVariablesAndTypeAssertions
(as used in exhaustive-deps.rule.ts) and then check the resulting node.type ===
AST_NODE_TYPES.ArrayExpression; add tests covering both "as const"
(TSAsExpression) and "satisfies" (TSSatisfiesExpression) forms to ensure these
assertion-wrapped array literals are recognized.
- Around line 75-76: The rule must stop relying on raw identifier text and
instead resolve symbols via import specifiers and scope bindings: update places
using isIdentifierWithOneOfNames, isIdentifierWithName, and the
queryClientVariables Set to resolve the node's binding (use
context.getScope()/sourceCode.getScope or eslint-utils findVariable) and then
verify the binding originates from a TanStack import via
helpers.isTanstackQueryImport by checking the ImportSpecifier/ImportDeclaration
and the imported.name (e.g., 'useQuery', 'useQueryClient', 'QueryClient'); when
tracking QueryClient results store the actual Variable/binding or the
ImportSpecifier reference instead of a string so membership checks are
scope-aware and won’t match shadowed parameters, and for aliased imports compare
the import specifier's imported.name to the canonical TanStack symbol names
rather than the local identifier text.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 3697aff5-b7ea-4d4f-a1de-925c4b9f3ac8
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
.changeset/prefer-query-options-rule.mddocs/config.jsondocs/eslint/eslint-plugin-query.mddocs/eslint/prefer-query-options.mdpackages/eslint-plugin-query/src/__tests__/prefer-query-options.test.tspackages/eslint-plugin-query/src/index.tspackages/eslint-plugin-query/src/rules.tspackages/eslint-plugin-query/src/rules/prefer-query-options/prefer-query-options.rule.ts
packages/eslint-plugin-query/src/rules/prefer-query-options/prefer-query-options.rule.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/eslint-plugin-query/src/rules/prefer-query-options/prefer-query-options.rule.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/eslint-plugin-query/src/rules/prefer-query-options/prefer-query-options.rule.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…k/query into feat-eslint-prefer-query-options
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In
`@packages/eslint-plugin-query/src/rules/prefer-query-options/prefer-query-options.rule.ts`:
- Around line 78-94: The rule currently inspects nodes directly and misses
patterns wrapped in TypeScript assertions/satisfies; update
reportInlineQueryOptions and reportInlineFilterQueryKey to first call
unwrapTypeAssertions(node) and use the unwrapped node for
ASTUtils.isObjectExpression checks and subsequent
hasInlineQueryOptions/hasInlineFilterQueryKey evaluations, and likewise apply
unwrapTypeAssertions when traversing queries entries (the logic around the
queries array that checks each entry) so that asserted/satisfied
ObjectExpression/ArrayExpression forms are detected; keep existing messageIds
and only change the inspected node to the unwrapped result.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 3e887bb9-56cc-4d8e-be48-9e9b47c3ca38
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
docs/eslint/prefer-query-options.mdpackages/eslint-plugin-query/src/__tests__/prefer-query-options.test.tspackages/eslint-plugin-query/src/rules/prefer-query-options/prefer-query-options.rule.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- docs/eslint/prefer-query-options.md
| function reportInlineQueryOptions(node: TSESTree.Node): void { | ||
| if (ASTUtils.isObjectExpression(node) && hasInlineQueryOptions(node)) { | ||
| context.report({ | ||
| node, | ||
| messageId: 'preferQueryOptions', | ||
| }) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function reportInlineFilterQueryKey(node: TSESTree.Node): void { | ||
| if (ASTUtils.isObjectExpression(node) && hasInlineFilterQueryKey(node)) { | ||
| context.report({ | ||
| node, | ||
| messageId: 'preferQueryOptionsQueryKey', | ||
| }) | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
# First, locate and examine the target file
fd -t f "prefer-query-options.rule.ts" packages/eslint-plugin-queryRepository: TanStack/query
Length of output: 146
🏁 Script executed:
# Get the file size to determine how to read it
wc -l packages/eslint-plugin-query/src/rules/prefer-query-options/prefer-query-options.rule.tsRepository: TanStack/query
Length of output: 150
🏁 Script executed:
# Read the entire file to understand the implementation
cat -n packages/eslint-plugin-query/src/rules/prefer-query-options/prefer-query-options.rule.tsRepository: TanStack/query
Length of output: 12438
🏁 Script executed:
# Find test files for this rule
fd -t f "prefer-query-options" packages/eslint-plugin-query/src/rules --type fRepository: TanStack/query
Length of output: 146
🏁 Script executed:
# Look for test directory
fd -t d "__tests__" packages/eslint-plugin-query/src/rules/prefer-query-options/Repository: TanStack/query
Length of output: 40
🏁 Script executed:
# Find test files more broadly
fd "prefer-query-options" packages/eslint-plugin-query -type f | grep -i testRepository: TanStack/query
Length of output: 228
🏁 Script executed:
# Look for test files in the rules directory
find packages/eslint-plugin-query -name "*prefer-query-options*" -type fRepository: TanStack/query
Length of output: 218
🏁 Script executed:
# Read the test file
cat -n packages/eslint-plugin-query/src/__tests__/prefer-query-options.test.tsRepository: TanStack/query
Length of output: 39919
🏁 Script executed:
# Double-check the exact line ranges mentioned in the review comment
# Lines 124-127 (queriesHooks handling)
sed -n '124,127p' packages/eslint-plugin-query/src/rules/prefer-query-options/prefer-query-options.rule.tsRepository: TanStack/query
Length of output: 186
🏁 Script executed:
# Lines 210-288 (getReturnedObjectExpressions and getQueryObjects)
sed -n '210,288p' packages/eslint-plugin-query/src/rules/prefer-query-options/prefer-query-options.rule.tsRepository: TanStack/query
Length of output: 2039
🏁 Script executed:
# Verify unwrapTypeAssertions implementation
sed -n '379,389p' packages/eslint-plugin-query/src/rules/prefer-query-options/prefer-query-options.rule.tsRepository: TanStack/query
Length of output: 347
Unwrap asserted option objects before inspecting them.
unwrapTypeAssertions() only protects raw query-key arrays. Patterns like useQuery({ queryKey: ['todos'], queryFn: () => fetchTodos() } as const), queryClient.fetchQuery({ ... } satisfies SomeOptions), and useQueries({ queries: ([{ ... }] as const) }) bypass the rule because these paths still require a bare ObjectExpression/ArrayExpression. Add unwrapping before object checks and while traversing queries entries.
Suggested fix
function reportInlineQueryOptions(node: TSESTree.Node): void {
- if (ASTUtils.isObjectExpression(node) && hasInlineQueryOptions(node)) {
+ const expression = unwrapTypeAssertions(node)
+ if (
+ ASTUtils.isObjectExpression(expression) &&
+ hasInlineQueryOptions(expression)
+ ) {
context.report({
node,
messageId: 'preferQueryOptions',
})
}
}
function reportInlineFilterQueryKey(node: TSESTree.Node): void {
- if (ASTUtils.isObjectExpression(node) && hasInlineFilterQueryKey(node)) {
+ const expression = unwrapTypeAssertions(node)
+ if (
+ ASTUtils.isObjectExpression(expression) &&
+ hasInlineFilterQueryKey(expression)
+ ) {
context.report({
node,
messageId: 'preferQueryOptionsQueryKey',
})
}
}
@@
- if (
- queriesHooks.includes(importedName) &&
- ASTUtils.isObjectExpression(options)
- ) {
+ const expression = unwrapTypeAssertions(options)
+ if (
+ queriesHooks.includes(importedName) &&
+ ASTUtils.isObjectExpression(expression)
+ ) {
const queries = ASTUtils.findPropertyWithIdentifierKey(
- options.properties,
+ expression.properties,
'queries',
)?.value
@@
function getReturnedObjectExpressions(
node: TSESTree.Node,
): Array<TSESTree.ObjectExpression> {
+ node = unwrapTypeAssertions(node)
+
if (ASTUtils.isObjectExpression(node)) {
return [node]
}
@@
function getQueryObjects(
node: TSESTree.Node,
): Array<TSESTree.ObjectExpression> {
+ node = unwrapTypeAssertions(node)
+
if (node.type === AST_NODE_TYPES.ArrayExpression) {
- return node.elements.flatMap((element) => {
- if (element !== null && ASTUtils.isObjectExpression(element)) {
- return [element]
- }
-
- return []
- })
+ return node.elements.flatMap((element) =>
+ element === null ? [] : getReturnedObjectExpressions(element),
+ )
}Also applies to: 124-127, 210-288
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In
`@packages/eslint-plugin-query/src/rules/prefer-query-options/prefer-query-options.rule.ts`
around lines 78 - 94, The rule currently inspects nodes directly and misses
patterns wrapped in TypeScript assertions/satisfies; update
reportInlineQueryOptions and reportInlineFilterQueryKey to first call
unwrapTypeAssertions(node) and use the unwrapped node for
ASTUtils.isObjectExpression checks and subsequent
hasInlineQueryOptions/hasInlineFilterQueryKey evaluations, and likewise apply
unwrapTypeAssertions when traversing queries entries (the logic around the
queries array that checks each entry) so that asserted/satisfied
ObjectExpression/ArrayExpression forms are detected; keep existing messageIds
and only change the inspected node to the unwrapped result.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/eslint-plugin-query/src/__tests__/prefer-query-options.test.ts (2)
45-130: Add direct and mapped builder happy paths.The valid hook matrix covers identifiers and wrapper calls, but it still doesn't lock down
useQuery(queryOptions(...))or mapped builder results foruseQueries/useSuspenseQueries. Those are common migration shapes for this rule, so a false positive there would still pass the suite.Suggested additions
valid: [ { name: 'useQuery with queryOptions result is allowed', code: normalizeIndent` import { useQuery, queryOptions } from '@tanstack/react-query' const todosOptions = queryOptions({ queryKey: ['todos'], queryFn: () => fetchTodos(), }) function Component() { const query = useQuery(todosOptions) return null } `, }, + { + name: 'useQuery with inline queryOptions call is allowed', + code: normalizeIndent` + import { useQuery, queryOptions } from '@tanstack/react-query' + + function Component() { + const query = useQuery( + queryOptions({ + queryKey: ['todos'], + queryFn: () => fetchTodos(), + }), + ) + return null + } + `, + }, { name: 'useQueries with all entries from queryOptions is allowed', code: normalizeIndent` import { useQueries } from '@tanstack/react-query' function Component() { const queries = useQueries({ queries: [todosOptions, usersOptions], }) return null } `, }, + { + name: 'useQueries with mapped queryOptions results is allowed', + code: normalizeIndent` + import { useQueries } from '@tanstack/react-query' + + function Component({ ids }) { + const queries = useQueries({ + queries: ids.map((id) => getTodoOptions(id)), + }) + return null + } + `, + }, + { + name: 'useSuspenseQueries with mapped queryOptions results is allowed', + code: normalizeIndent` + import { useSuspenseQueries } from '@tanstack/react-query' + + function Component({ ids }) { + const queries = useSuspenseQueries({ + queries: ids.map((id) => getTodoOptions(id)), + }) + return null + } + `, + }, ],🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@packages/eslint-plugin-query/src/__tests__/prefer-query-options.test.ts` around lines 45 - 130, Add happy-path tests to cover direct and mapped builder usages so the rule doesn't false-positive: add a valid case where useQuery is called directly with a queryOptions call (e.g., useQuery(queryOptions({...})) and a valid case where useQueries / useSuspenseQueries receive mapped builder results (e.g., queries: [todosOptions, usersOptions].map(... ) or queries: [todosOptions(), usersOptions()]). Update the test block under "hooks consuming queryOptions result" in prefer-query-options.test.ts to include these scenarios (referencing useQuery, useQueries, useSuspenseQueries, queryOptions, todosOptions, usersOptions) as additional entries in the valid array.
659-767: Add matching happy paths for client methods that take full options.
fetchQuery,prefetchQuery, and theensure*methods are only asserted in the failing inline-object form. Adding a shared-options happy path would protect the rule's intended replacement pattern on the queryClient side too.Suggested additions
valid: [ { name: 'queryClient.getQueryData with options.queryKey is allowed', code: normalizeIndent` import { useQueryClient, queryOptions } from '@tanstack/react-query' const todosOptions = queryOptions({ queryKey: ['todos'], queryFn: () => fetchTodos(), }) function Component() { const queryClient = useQueryClient() const data = queryClient.getQueryData(todosOptions.queryKey) return null } `, }, + { + name: 'queryClient.fetchQuery with queryOptions result is allowed', + code: normalizeIndent` + import { useQueryClient, queryOptions } from '@tanstack/react-query' + + const todosOptions = queryOptions({ + queryKey: ['todos'], + queryFn: () => fetchTodos(), + }) + + function Component() { + const queryClient = useQueryClient() + queryClient.fetchQuery(todosOptions) + return null + } + `, + }, + { + name: 'queryClient.fetchInfiniteQuery with builder call result is allowed', + code: normalizeIndent` + import { useQueryClient } from '@tanstack/react-query' + + function Component({ id }) { + const queryClient = useQueryClient() + queryClient.fetchInfiniteQuery(getTodoPagesOptions(id)) + return null + } + `, + }, ],🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@packages/eslint-plugin-query/src/__tests__/prefer-query-options.test.ts` around lines 659 - 767, Add matching "happy path" valid tests for the queryClient methods that accept full options so the rule verifies the allowed replacement pattern; specifically add valid cases for fetchQuery, prefetchQuery, fetchInfiniteQuery, prefetchInfiniteQuery, ensureQueryData, and ensureInfiniteQueryData that demonstrate the accepted "shared/options" usage (the intended replacement for the inline { queryKey, queryFn } pattern) so the rule's client-side behavior is covered alongside the current invalid tests that reference those methods.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Nitpick comments:
In `@packages/eslint-plugin-query/src/__tests__/prefer-query-options.test.ts`:
- Around line 45-130: Add happy-path tests to cover direct and mapped builder
usages so the rule doesn't false-positive: add a valid case where useQuery is
called directly with a queryOptions call (e.g., useQuery(queryOptions({...}))
and a valid case where useQueries / useSuspenseQueries receive mapped builder
results (e.g., queries: [todosOptions, usersOptions].map(... ) or queries:
[todosOptions(), usersOptions()]). Update the test block under "hooks consuming
queryOptions result" in prefer-query-options.test.ts to include these scenarios
(referencing useQuery, useQueries, useSuspenseQueries, queryOptions,
todosOptions, usersOptions) as additional entries in the valid array.
- Around line 659-767: Add matching "happy path" valid tests for the queryClient
methods that accept full options so the rule verifies the allowed replacement
pattern; specifically add valid cases for fetchQuery, prefetchQuery,
fetchInfiniteQuery, prefetchInfiniteQuery, ensureQueryData, and
ensureInfiniteQueryData that demonstrate the accepted "shared/options" usage
(the intended replacement for the inline { queryKey, queryFn } pattern) so the
rule's client-side behavior is covered alongside the current invalid tests that
reference those methods.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 035de3d3-cacd-4f1c-8d05-338c4db141b8
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/eslint-plugin-query/src/__tests__/prefer-query-options.test.ts
Prior discussion #8515
🎯 Changes
New ESLint rule
prefer-query-optionsthat enforces usingqueryOptions()/infiniteQueryOptions()to co-locate query keys and functions. A query key should be defined exactly once — the rule flags every place where a user types one manually.This is rule is stricter and more opinionated than the others, I also created
recommendedStrictconfig (flat/recommended-strict) which includes allrecommendedrules plus this rule.Examples:
✅ Checklist
pnpm run test:pr.🚀 Release Impact
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Tests
Examples
Chores