-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
Factor linear/Lotka-Voltera ODE analyses through PolynomialSystem
#1007
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
042b504
Derive some useful instances
georgefst 549ff84
Remove redundant constraint
georgefst feffc3c
Add more useful instances
georgefst 7d2c99e
Convert Lotka-Voltera ODEs to polynomials
georgefst 8a6fb5a
Convert linear ODEs to polynomials
5a06dc5
Remove Lotka-Voltera type
georgefst 8fc44c3
Remove Linear ODE type
georgefst 142577e
Fix Clippy warning
georgefst 87aac30
Refactor linear ODE systems to use symbolic coefficients
georgefst ec48a89
Refactor Lotva-Volterra ODE systems to use symbolic coefficients
georgefst 18316ac
CLEANUP: Test linear/LV ODE analyses without simulating ODE.
epatters File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The exponent for linear systems is obviously always 1. So it's tempting to use or define a singleton type, but that might be overkill. Not sure how easy or conventional it is in Rust.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure this accounts for constants (zero exponents) though. We'd need a type with 0 and 1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh yeah, good point 🤦♂️
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could of course define a zero-or-one type instead. But still, probably overkill.