[WIP] Run tests with Bloop when the build server wasn't disabled#4330
Draft
Gedochao wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
[WIP] Run tests with Bloop when the build server wasn't disabled#4330Gedochao wants to merge 1 commit into
Gedochao wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
This needs a Bloop bump when it's out to bring scalacenter/bloop#2938 in. |
dea9304 to
542ad00
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When the build server wasn't disabled with
--server=false, we could be running tests with Bloop.Of course,
test-runnerandjava-test-runnerwould still be used with--server=false.Checklist
scala-cli fmt .)scalafix(./mill -i __.fix)How much have your relied on LLM-based tools in this contribution?
Extensively
How was the solution tested?
split the
testcommand integration tests into dedicated suites, with and without Bloop tested separately