docs: add open-source growth plan#1
Conversation
Reviewer's GuideAdds a new OPEN_SOURCE_GROWTH_PLAN.md doc outlining quick wins, quality guidelines, star-growth strategies, tooling ideas, and suggested follow-up PRs for the repository, without changing runtime behavior. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 20 minutes and 1 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey - I've found 1 issue, and left some high level feedback:
- The references to tools like "Pyrefly-style", "GPT-Pilot-style", and "MarkItDown-style" may be unclear to new contributors; consider adding brief descriptions or links so people understand what patterns you’re proposing to emulate.
- Some items in the growth plan (e.g., generated progress table, problem index script, CI compilation) would benefit from explicit success criteria or examples so future contributors can implement them consistently without needing additional clarification.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- The references to tools like "Pyrefly-style", "GPT-Pilot-style", and "MarkItDown-style" may be unclear to new contributors; consider adding brief descriptions or links so people understand what patterns you’re proposing to emulate.
- Some items in the growth plan (e.g., generated progress table, problem index script, CI compilation) would benefit from explicit success criteria or examples so future contributors can implement them consistently without needing additional clarification.
## Individual Comments
### Comment 1
<location path="docs/OPEN_SOURCE_GROWTH_PLAN.md" line_range="3" />
<code_context>
+# Open Source Growth Plan
+
+This plan turns the repository review into a practical backlog for Leetcode Problems.
+
+## Quick wins
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**suggestion (typo):** Consider standardizing the capitalization of "LeetCode" here.
You already use "LeetCode" elsewhere (e.g., "LeetCode problem"), so please update this to "LeetCode problems" for consistency.
```suggestion
This plan turns the repository review into a practical backlog for LeetCode problems.
```
</issue_to_address>Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
| @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ | |||
| # Open Source Growth Plan | |||
|
|
|||
| This plan turns the repository review into a practical backlog for Leetcode Problems. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (typo): Consider standardizing the capitalization of "LeetCode" here.
You already use "LeetCode" elsewhere (e.g., "LeetCode problem"), so please update this to "LeetCode problems" for consistency.
| This plan turns the repository review into a practical backlog for Leetcode Problems. | |
| This plan turns the repository review into a practical backlog for LeetCode problems. |
![cubic-dev-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1082092?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
1 issue found across 1 file
Prompt for AI agents (unresolved issues)
Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them. If appropriate, use sub-agents to investigate and fix each issue separately.
<file name="docs/OPEN_SOURCE_GROWTH_PLAN.md">
<violation number="1" location="docs/OPEN_SOURCE_GROWTH_PLAN.md:8">
P3: This backlog item appears already implemented per the repository README, so it is misleading as a "quick win." Reframe it as an audit/consistency task or replace it with a missing capability.</violation>
</file>
Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix. Tag @cubic-dev-ai to re-run a review.
| ## Quick wins | ||
|
|
||
| - Add a generated progress table by topic, difficulty, and language. | ||
| - Add links from each solution to the related LeetCode problem. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P3: This backlog item appears already implemented per the repository README, so it is misleading as a "quick win." Reframe it as an audit/consistency task or replace it with a missing capability.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. At docs/OPEN_SOURCE_GROWTH_PLAN.md, line 8:
<comment>This backlog item appears already implemented per the repository README, so it is misleading as a "quick win." Reframe it as an audit/consistency task or replace it with a missing capability.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+## Quick wins
+
+- Add a generated progress table by topic, difficulty, and language.
+- Add links from each solution to the related LeetCode problem.
+- Add automated compile/test checks for C++ and Java solutions.
+- Add a Python-solution contribution path with type hints.
</file context>
| - Add links from each solution to the related LeetCode problem. | |
| - Audit and enforce that every solution directory includes a link to the related LeetCode problem. |
1 participant
Adds a repository-specific growth plan. This documentation-only PR does not change runtime behavior.
Summary by Sourcery
Documentation:
Summary by cubic
Adds
docs/OPEN_SOURCE_GROWTH_PLAN.md, a repository-specific backlog and growth strategy for the LeetCode solutions repo. Covers quick wins, quality guidelines, star-growth tactics, and suggested next PRs; documentation-only with no runtime changes.Written for commit df8a906. Summary will update on new commits.