Fix KvmSshToAgentEnabled setting description and make it dynamic#12533
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #12533 +/- ##
=============================================
- Coverage 17.85% 3.57% -14.28%
=============================================
Files 5930 448 -5482
Lines 531409 37908 -493501
Branches 64963 7008 -57955
=============================================
- Hits 94869 1357 -93512
+ Misses 425914 36385 -389529
+ Partials 10626 166 -10460
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@nvazquez a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with no SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 16570 |
|
@nvazquez , i would like this in 20.3 |
|
@shwstppr @DaanHoogland I can target it for 4.20.3, please note the schema changes must be ported to the corresponding schema changes on forward merge to not lose the configuration update on CloudStack upgrades |
ba979fa to
c760f5f
Compare
|
This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch. |
|
@shwstppr @DaanHoogland updated for 4.20 @blueorangutan package |
|
@nvazquez a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 16590 |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@nvazquez a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
22.0->22.1, yes |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-15321)
|


Description
This PR makes the setting
kvm.ssh.to.agentdynamic, and updates its description as pointed out on the issue #12529.The setting has been introduced with the wrong description on the PR: #3239
Fixes: #12529
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?