[SPARK-54957][PYTHON][TEST] Remove the unnecessary sleep in streaming tests#53724
Closed
gaogaotiantian wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
Closed
[SPARK-54957][PYTHON][TEST] Remove the unnecessary sleep in streaming tests#53724gaogaotiantian wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
gaogaotiantian wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
JIRA Issue Information=== Test SPARK-54957 === This comment was automatically generated by GitHub Actions |
HyukjinKwon
approved these changes
Jan 12, 2026
Member
|
Merged to master. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Instead of do a fixed time wait, we try to poll results until it meets the requirement.
Why are the changes needed?
We are wasting time on this test.
time.sleep(60)is totally unnecessary. I still have trouble with the othertime.sleep(30)which just try to wait to see if the server crashes without traffic - but at least that has an explanation.Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
My local setup has some issues with this specific test so I'll have to wait for the CI result.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No