Add YouTube hotkeys disabling script details#101
Add YouTube hotkeys disabling script details#101VKrishna04 wants to merge 2 commits intoawesome-scripts:masterfrom
Conversation
Added details for disabling YouTube hotkeys with a modern settings page.
Add YouTube hotkeys disabling script details
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR adds a new userscript entry for "Disable YouTube Hotkeys with Modern Settings Page" to the README's YouTube section.
Changes:
- Added a new collapsible details section for the "Disable YouTube Hotkeys" userscript with description, installation link, project view link, and bug report link
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| ### <picture><source type="image/png" media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/awesome-scripts/awesome-userscripts@f11c95f/assets/images/icons/sites/youtube/white/icon32.png"><img height=17 src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/awesome-scripts/awesome-userscripts@f11c95f/assets/images/icons/sites/youtube/icon32.png"></picture> YouTube | ||
|
|
||
| <details> <!-- Disable YouTube Hotkeys with Modern Settings Page --> | ||
| <summary><a href="https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/563265-disable-youtube-hotkeys-with-modern-settings-page">Disable YouTube Hotkeys</a> - with Modern Settings Page</summary><br> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The summary text appears to redundantly repeat part of the script title. The link text "Disable YouTube Hotkeys" is followed by " - with Modern Settings Page", but this phrase is already part of the script's full name. Consider either using the full title in the link text without the repetitive suffix, or replacing the suffix with a more descriptive summary of what the script does (following the pattern of other entries like "Simple Sponsor Skipper" which has a functional description rather than repeating the title).
| <summary><a href="https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/563265-disable-youtube-hotkeys-with-modern-settings-page">Disable YouTube Hotkeys</a> - with Modern Settings Page</summary><br> | |
| <summary><a href="https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/563265-disable-youtube-hotkeys-with-modern-settings-page">Disable YouTube Hotkeys</a> - Disable various YouTube hotkeys with fine-grained control.</summary><br> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
sure then move the with Modern Settings page to the title and then add the Disable various YouTube hotkeys with fine-grained control. beside
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sup @VKrishna04 can you tell me what does the userscript do? Thanks! (i.e. what are the hot keys disabled and then I can test it because left/right arrows still seek to frames)
Sorry about the delay —Hey! Thanks for checking. This is not just “disable numbers” — it’s a fine‑grained YouTube hotkeys blocker. The script intercepts keyboard events on Hotkeys it can block (configurable)Timeline / seeking
Playback / UI
Other YouTube shortcut panels / controls
(There are also extra toggles for some player “advanced” behaviors like text/window opacity, font size +/- and pan/zoom keys — they’re off by default.) Defaults (important for your test)By default it blocks:
…and it does NOT block left/right arrows unless you enable the “Disable Progress Forward / Rewind (← →)” toggle. About your note (left/right still seeking)That’s expected with default settings: left/right is not blocked by default in the current script. VKrishna04, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Dude there is nothing in the PR or even GF link to indicate all of what you said so it is really strange user has to guess what happens when left/right (probably the most used hotkeys on YouTube) didn't get disabled, also if you're gonna use AI to explain it to me (which is just really weeird like you're a human and just made me zone you out just like AI does) why not make a README for it instead?
i.e. Awesome List is not your "testing ground" like I am not unpaid QA you should have things ready in a polished README yourself and expect to succeed w/o reliance on the List i.e. make everything perfect including README, then it can be tested for working or not (according to README) and then is it Awesome
That is at least better than forcing me to be like product managing or QA for you before you're even ready (which I will gladly do but at least put some work into it first, when you use AI to talk to people it just makes them feel disrespected like you couldn't even bother to type literal setences yourself for their undivided attention, forget about the code)
adamlui
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@VKrishna04 also I konw you used DeepSeek cuz the employees made it talk/code/reason like me in recent months (your 'and' is '+' and arrow symbols etc. were the dead giveaways, that's why I abandoned them) which made it even more weird when you pasted it to me...
|
(DeepSeek employees obsessively read my chats, that's why the deep thought is "collapsible" now my last msg I asked why are you sayin things in your thoughts to me, also they stole my menu design from CWM which is really popular in China where they work to collapse it, it keeps trending #1 on Edge Store six months in row now is how they installed it and pieced 2 and 2 the author is me then chat spying began) |
|
(OpenAI does the same thing too is why I abandoned them too lol it is like ping pong like everyone trying to rape my brain) |
|
Actually even their awesome repo creation and design was based off this one |
|
So do you see how weird that was. You used AI to write a script, it didn't work as you initially described, then you used AI that is like my persona to tell me why it didn't work lol |
Added details for disabling YouTube hotkeys with a modern settings page.