Skip to content

[PM-30483] Remove feature flagged logic around passkey unlock#7318

Open
eligrubb wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
km/pm-30483/remove-passkey-ff-logic
Open

[PM-30483] Remove feature flagged logic around passkey unlock#7318
eligrubb wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
km/pm-30483/remove-passkey-ff-logic

Conversation

@eligrubb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@eligrubb eligrubb commented Mar 26, 2026

🎟️ Tracking

https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-30483

📔 Objective

Now that passkey unlock has been released, this change, paired with clients PR#19798 removes the logic related to the passkey unlock feature flag pm-2035-passkey-unlock. The feature flag itself will be removed in a future ticket: https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-30484

📸 Screenshots

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 26, 2026

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details6c631b84-0765-4a9b-a885-184f3a9f9b8f

Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Mar 26, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 57.87%. Comparing base (34aba63) to head (33be621).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7318      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   57.86%   57.87%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        2044     2044              
  Lines       90081    90112      +31     
  Branches     8014     8014              
==========================================
+ Hits        52126    52156      +30     
- Misses      36091    36092       +1     
  Partials     1864     1864              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@eligrubb eligrubb added the ai-review-vnext Request a Claude code review using the vNext workflow label Mar 26, 2026
@eligrubb eligrubb removed the ai-review-vnext Request a Claude code review using the vNext workflow label Mar 26, 2026
@eligrubb eligrubb marked this pull request as ready for review March 26, 2026 23:22
@eligrubb eligrubb requested a review from a team as a code owner March 26, 2026 23:22
@eligrubb eligrubb requested review from a team and gbubemismith March 26, 2026 23:22
var organizationIdsClaimingActiveUser = organizationClaimingActiveUser.Select(o => o.Id);

var organizationAbilities = await GetOrganizationAbilitiesAsync(ciphers);
var webAuthnCredentials = _featureService.IsEnabled(FeatureFlagKeys.PM2035PasskeyUnlock)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❓ do we also need to remove PM2035PasskeyUnlock from the constants.cs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe we need to leave the flag in constants.cs. The server still needs to report the feature flag for 3 releases after we remove it from clients to maintain backwards compatibility; the flagged logic is part of the extension client. There is a separate ticket, PM-30484, for removing the flag completely.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants