Add secondhand-text exemption to Detection Guidance#154
Open
loewenmaehne wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The skill currently has no guidance for watched phrases the writer did not author, so a quoted phrase, a work title, or a use-mention is fair game for rewriting. That means the humanizer can change words inside someone else's quote or a product name.
This adds one bullet to the "What NOT to flag" section of Detection Guidance that leaves those alone: quotation and reported speech, proper nouns and titles, use-mention, and historical sources. The author's own use of the same phrase is still judged normally.
It applies to every pattern, not just one, and it does not add or renumber any pattern. Version bumped to 2.8.1 with a history note.