[CASB] Add CASB webhooks docs and new feature changelog#29491
[CASB] Add CASB webhooks docs and new feature changelog#29491acdunbrack wants to merge 4 commits intocloudflare:productionfrom
Conversation
|
Hi @ranbel ! Tagging you in case you if you have a moment to review these new CASB docs & changelog. Feel free to lmk if anything needs revision, etc. Or if someone else is able to get to this first, not a problem with me! |
codyanthony850
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM! Clean, well-structured docs for the new webhooks feature.
Left one minor note on the duplicate webhook send instructions in manage-findings.mdx and findings/index.mdx. May consider using a partial instead if duplication is not intentional. Not blocking, just flagging for awareness.
| Cloud & SaaS findings will display details about your posture finding, including the finding type, [severity level](#severity-levels), number of instances, associated integration, current status, and date detected. For more information on each instance of the finding, select **Manage**. | ||
|
|
||
| To manage the finding's visibility, you can update the finding's [severity level](#severity-levels) or [hide the finding](#hide-findings) from view. Additionally, some findings provide a remediation guide to resolve the issue or support [creating a Gateway HTTP policy](#resolve-finding-with-a-gateway-policy) to block the traffic. | ||
| To manage the finding's visibility, you can update the finding's [severity level](#severity-levels) or [hide the finding](#hide-findings) from view. You can also [send a posture finding instance to a webhook](#send-posture-finding-instances-to-a-webhook). Some findings also provide a remediation guide to resolve the issue or support [creating a Gateway HTTP policy](#resolve-finding-with-a-gateway-policy) to block the traffic. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One minor note: the webhook send instructions appear in both manage-findings.mdx and findings/index.mdx — intentional duplication or candidate for a partial? Not blocking, just flagging for awareness.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the review, @codyanthony850 ! Definitely candidate for a partial, I agree. I'll do a follow-up PR next week to set up/replace.
|
Would the above be acceptable to merge, @codyanthony850? Then for me to make a separate PR to implement partials on that one element? PTO right now and want to be sure I implement partials properly (back next week). |
Updated the release date for CASB webhooks documentation.
Summary
Documentation checklist