Skip to content

[pull] main from expo:main#652

Merged
pull[bot] merged 13 commits intocode:mainfrom
expo:main
Mar 5, 2026
Merged

[pull] main from expo:main#652
pull[bot] merged 13 commits intocode:mainfrom
expo:main

Conversation

@pull
Copy link

@pull pull bot commented Mar 5, 2026

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.4)

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

amandeepmittal and others added 13 commits March 5, 2026 21:21
Co-authored-by: Aman Mittal <10234615+amandeepmittal@users.noreply.github.com>
# Fix Android Switch ripple effect clipped on sides

## Summary

Fixes #43554

The Switch ripple effect on Android was clipped to a rectangle instead
of rendering as a circle extending beyond the component bounds.

## Root cause

`ExpoComposeView` extends `ExpoView` which extends `LinearLayout`. By
default, `LinearLayout` has clips the children. Also,
`ExpoView.dispatchDraw()` calls `clipToPaddingBox(canvas)` which clips
the drawing canvas to the view's bounds before dispatching to children.

When `Host` uses `matchContents`, the view is sized to exactly fit the
Switch content. The ripple effect on the Switch thumb gets cut off at
the view boundary.

## Fix

Disable `clipChildren` and `clipToPadding` on `ExpoComposeView` when
`withHostingView = true`

- `clipToPadding = false` — skips the `clipToPaddingBox` canvas clipping
in `dispatchDraw`, allowing content (ripples, shadows) to render outside
view bounds
- `clipChildren = false` — allows child views to draw outside their own
bounds within the parent

## Test plan

- Open NCL → Expo UI → Switch on Android
- The ripple should render as a circle, not clipped on the sides


# Checklist

<!--
Please check the appropriate items below if they apply to your diff.
-->

- [x] I added a `changelog.md` entry and rebuilt the package sources
according to [this short
guide](https://github.com/expo/expo/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#-before-submitting)
- [ ] This diff will work correctly for `npx expo prebuild` & EAS Build
(eg: updated a module plugin).
- [ ] Conforms with the [Documentation Writing Style
Guide](https://github.com/expo/expo/blob/main/guides/Expo%20Documentation%20Writing%20Style%20Guide.md)
…e 0.83 (#43682)

# Why

Closes #43645

# How

Add version mapping for SDK 55 and react native 0.83 to
install-expo-modules

# Test Plan

Tested locally 

# Checklist

<!--
Please check the appropriate items below if they apply to your diff.
-->

- [ ] I added a `changelog.md` entry and rebuilt the package sources
according to [this short
guide](https://github.com/expo/expo/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#-before-submitting)
- [ ] This diff will work correctly for `npx expo prebuild` & EAS Build
(eg: updated a module plugin).
- [ ] Conforms with the [Documentation Writing Style
Guide](https://github.com/expo/expo/blob/main/guides/Expo%20Documentation%20Writing%20Style%20Guide.md)
…43606)

# Why

While it's assumed that we'd always have a routes manifest, this isn't
always the case. `getRoutesCore` itself self-documents that a tutorial
is displayed when no routes are present, and it returns `null` for the
directory structure. This `null` value is carried through to where the
routes output is used, until the manifests are created. There, we
instead unfortunately throw an error.

This is a pre-condition that's instead asserted as an error, which is
unexpected, and leads to unintended cases where the build cryptically
fails. We should aim not to fail the build even when the app is in an
"intermediary" state. See: #43602

Specifically, I believe we should gracefully continue building the app
as often as possible, even if prerequisites aren't fulfilled. In this
case, when no routes are present, we should continue building. If we
want to enforce the "no routes" case, we should add a clear error in a
place where we handle build exceptions instead.

# How

- Prevent `null` route tree from throwing when manifests are generated
- Prevent `null` route tree from throwing when static react-navigation
configs are generated

# Test Plan

- Build without an `app` folder and observe that the build shouldn't
fail
  - Example: `E2E_ROUTER_SRC=noop expo export -p web` in `router-e2e`

# Checklist

<!--
Please check the appropriate items below if they apply to your diff.
-->

- [x] I added a `changelog.md` entry and rebuilt the package sources
according to [this short
guide](https://github.com/expo/expo/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#-before-submitting)
- [ ] This diff will work correctly for `npx expo prebuild` & EAS Build
(eg: updated a module plugin).
- [ ] Conforms with the [Documentation Writing Style
Guide](https://github.com/expo/expo/blob/main/guides/Expo%20Documentation%20Writing%20Style%20Guide.md)
# Why

Reverts:
-
2619169
-
5b34e1d

# How

<!--
How did you build this feature or fix this bug and why?
-->

# Test Plan

1. Clean repo `git clean -fdx`
2. Build expo-go & test it with latest SDK-55 example (with screens
bumped to 4.24.0)
4. Build and test bare-expo 
5. Build router-e2e and test 

# Checklist

<!--
Please check the appropriate items below if they apply to your diff.
-->

- [ ] I added a `changelog.md` entry and rebuilt the package sources
according to [this short
guide](https://github.com/expo/expo/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#-before-submitting)
- [ ] This diff will work correctly for `npx expo prebuild` & EAS Build
(eg: updated a module plugin).
- [ ] Conforms with the [Documentation Writing Style
Guide](https://github.com/expo/expo/blob/main/guides/Expo%20Documentation%20Writing%20Style%20Guide.md)
Co-authored-by: Aman Mittal <10234615+amandeepmittal@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Aman Mittal <10234615+amandeepmittal@users.noreply.github.com>
…3696)

Co-authored-by: Aman Mittal <10234615+amandeepmittal@users.noreply.github.com>
# Why

- We should test that dev menu displays correctly in brownfield (as it
requires some modifications in brownfield in order to work) and we can
do it using Maestro
- Tests and workflows for brownfield are a bit duplicated and have
leftover filters, etc. - we can refine that

# How

`test-suite-brownfield-isolated.yml`

To avoid using matrices and using additional 2 runners:

- Extended existing build jobs with building & uploading of debug apps
- Extended existing test jobs with additional execution of Maestro tests
against the debug apps

`brownfield.yml`

- Removed unused cli and plugin path filters
- Removed `packages/expo-brownfield/**` filter for compilation tests -
this is now covered by Maestro E2Es workflow
- Extended filters for iOS compilation test with
`'packages/expo-modules-core/ios/**'` - commits there aren't very
frequent, but it affects `expo-brownfield` and now with ccache and
prebuilts we should be able to run it more often

**E2Es**

- Unified common test flows (e.g. for launching the app or skipping
initial dev menu)
- Added `dev-menu.yml` workflow
- Removed `android/basic.yml` and `ios/basic.yml` as all they do is
anyway covered by other test suites
- Unified workflows `navigation.yml` and `communication.yml`
- Updated test apps 

# Test Plan

Ensured that tests pass locally and on CI

# Checklist

- [X] I added a `changelog.md` entry and rebuilt the package sources
according to [this short
guide](https://github.com/expo/expo/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#-before-submitting)
- [x] This diff will work correctly for `npx expo prebuild` & EAS Build
(eg: updated a module plugin).

---------

Co-authored-by: Gabriel Donadel <donadeldev@gmail.com>
@pull pull bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 5, 2026
@pull pull bot added the ⤵️ pull label Mar 5, 2026
@pull pull bot merged commit 8323d01 into code:main Mar 5, 2026
19 of 34 checks passed
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants