-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
feat: DH-19246 Added rolling formula benchmarks #404
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Test | ||
| void rollingFormulaTick0Group3Ops() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These test the old (and slightly deprecated form of rolling formula) which allows a single formula to be executed on multple columns. The new formula call looks like this (where the input and output columns are specified in the formula field, and there is no param_token or cols field).
contains = rolling_formula_tick(formula="Contains=avg(num1)", rev_ticks=2000, fwd_ticks=3000)
""");
These tests are fine, but we should add some more tests that cover the new pathways as well.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Test | ||
| void rollingFormulaTick3Groups3Ops() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think 3groups testing is needed for RollingFormula
Jira: https://deephaven.atlassian.net/browse/DH-19246