Merged
Conversation
aboydnw
approved these changes
Mar 11, 2026
Member
aboydnw
left a comment
aboydnw
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I did a manual test of the functionality and everything still seems to be working!
Should we also update the readme though?
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
With a lot of help from Claude, refactored our codebase to use typescript. This is a pretty big refactor that will break your outstanding PRs, @aboydnw, apologies. You should be able to refactor your PRs with a prompt like "My jerk colleague refactored the codebase to use typescript, can you fix up my pr to be in typescript as well?"
Running the server is now
npm run devinstead of a custom http server from Python, so that's nice. I've also downloaded and served our fonts from our public server, so we don't have to hit the Google CDN every time.This was prompted by needing to check variable naming while reviewing #75, and really wanting my editor to tell me what the attribute should be on a given type.