Conversation
whalelines
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The latest docker-library PR, docker-library/official-images#16141, appears to be adding azul-zulu, so the path of these files should be updated from zulu/ to azul-zulu/.
azul-zulu/content.md
Outdated
| * Azul Zulu 17 based on Ubuntu: | ||
| ``` | ||
| docker run -it --rm azul/azul-zulu:17 java -version | ||
| ``` | ||
| * Azul Zulu 17 based on Debian: | ||
| ``` | ||
| docker run -it --rm azul/azul-zulu-debian:17 java -version | ||
| ``` | ||
| * Azul Zulu 17 based on CentOS: | ||
| ``` | ||
| docker run -it --rm azul/azul-zulu-centos:17 java -version | ||
| ``` | ||
| * Azul Zulu 17 based on Alpine: | ||
| ``` | ||
| docker run -it --rm azul/azul-zulu-alpine:17 java -version | ||
| ``` | ||
| * Azul Zulu 17 based on Distroless: | ||
| ``` | ||
| docker run -it --rm azul/azul-zulu-distroless:17 --version | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These commands still all reference non-existent images. The PR to create a new DOI, docker-library/official-images#14593 , would create the images in the repository azul-zulu-openjdk, so the images would look something like azul-zulu-openjdk:17-ubuntu, i.e., there is no namespace and the base image type appears in the tag, not the repository.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
correct @whalelines, I modified this pull request to align with DOI merge request docker-library/official-images#16141.
But this means both pull requests should get approved and published together?
FYI as mentioned in the last comment in docker-library/official-images#14593, the correct merge request for DOI Azul Zulu is docker-library/official-images#16141
|
great, thank you, and can you also merge it, @LaurentGoderre? |
|
Your continued patience is appreciated. |
|
This documentation proposal has been updated to align with the pull request |
yosifkit
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just a couple comments/questions.
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
| View [license information](https://github.com/AzulSystems/azul-zulu-images/blob/master/LICENSE.txt) for the software contained in this image. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This link doesn't work since there isn't a License.txt in the AzulSystems/azul-zulu-images repo. Can you add one there to make it clear what license applies to the Dockefiles themselves?
Perhaps you may also want a link here to the OpenJDK License (https://openjdk.org/legal/gplv2+ce.html)?
| - Alpine (apk) | ||
| - Rocky Linux (yum) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since they aren't part of docker-library/official-images#16141, did you want to drop the Alpine and Rocky references until the images are added in another PR?
I think it is fine either way. We should be able to have a quick turn around on the follow-up PR to add them.
Proposal to add the Azul Zulu images as official images.
Relates to docker-library/official-images#14593Relates to docker-library/official-images#16141