Skip to content

errors containing "internal_tablefilter" are not necessarily internal errors#70

Merged
Tmonster merged 1 commit into
duckdb:mainfrom
c-herrewijn:patch-1
Jun 1, 2026
Merged

errors containing "internal_tablefilter" are not necessarily internal errors#70
Tmonster merged 1 commit into
duckdb:mainfrom
c-herrewijn:patch-1

Conversation

@c-herrewijn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

the logic to detect internal errors now searches for the word "internal" in the error message. This leads to false positives, since some function names contain the word "internal" and print it also for regular errors.

This whitelist is used to filter out these false positives

… errors

the logic to detect internal errors now searches for the word "internal" in the error message. This leads to false positives, since some function names contain the word "internal" and print it also for regular errors.

This whitelist is used to filter out these false positives
@Tmonster
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Tmonster commented Jun 1, 2026

Already merged this, but it seems like the _internal_tablefilter is coming from a function call in the query? Can we instead make sure our fuzzer does not call that funciton? Or similar functions that start with internal?

@c-herrewijn c-herrewijn deleted the patch-1 branch June 1, 2026 08:33
@c-herrewijn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@Tmonster yes, will look into it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants