Update README.md

[hbrooks]

Important

Update heading in README.md from 'Dev Container' to 'DevContainer'.

• Documentation:
  • Update heading from ## Working in a Dev Container to ## Working in a DevContainer in README.md for consistency.

^{This description was created by for c19f63c. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev-beta]

Your free trial has expired. To keep using Ellipsis, sign up at https://app.ellipsis.dev or contact us.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to c19f63c in 1 minute and 5 seconds

More details

• Looked at 13 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 3 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. README.md:85

• Draft comment:
  Check naming consistency: Was the change from "Dev Container" to "DevContainer" intentional? Ensure consistency across docs.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50%
  None

2. README.md:85

• Draft comment:
  You changed the header from 'Dev Container' to 'DevContainer'. Ensure this modification aligns with common terminology (VS Code typically refers to 'Dev Container').
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50%
  None

3. README.md:85

• Draft comment:
  Typo alert: The header '## Working in a DevContainer' might be intended to be '## Working in a Dev Container' with a space between 'Dev' and 'Container' to match the common terminology. Please check if this was intentional.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
  This is a very minor formatting change in documentation. Both "DevContainer" and "Dev Container" are commonly used terms, with "Dev Container" being slightly more common but "DevContainer" also being valid and used by some organizations. This is purely stylistic and doesn't affect functionality.
  The comment might be pointing out an inconsistency with other mentions of the term in the codebase or with official Microsoft documentation.
  Even if there is an inconsistency, this is an extremely minor documentation formatting issue that doesn't impact functionality or clarity. Both forms are valid and commonly used.
  This comment should be deleted as it's purely about documentation formatting and doesn't impact functionality or clarity.

Workflow ID: wflow_VY16aKgSkN8BTWfZ

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.