fix: swapped argument order in new_inconsistent_union calls (#9001)

[RenzoMXD]

Summary

• Swapped argument order in new_inconsistent_union calls in reflection_verifier.rs
• The call was passing (field_type, field) but the function signature expects (field, field_type)

Issue

Fixes #9001

The new_inconsistent_union() function in verifier.rs expects (field, field_type), but the call site in reflection_verifier.rs was passing the arguments in reverse order — (format!("{}_type", field.name()), field.name()). This caused confusing/misleading error messages when union verification failed.

Test plan

• Verify union error messages now correctly report the field and field_type
• Existing tests pass