Skip to content

govctl-org/govctl

Repository files navigation

govctl logo

govctl

CI codecov Crates.io License: MIT Discord governed by govctl

A governance harness for AI coding.
Turn prompts and patches into RFCs, ADRs, work items, and guarded delivery.

govctl hero illustration showing AI coding workflows flowing through RFCs, ADRs, work items, and guards into reviewed delivery


govctl is a governance-as-code CLI for teams using AI to build software seriously.

It gives AI-assisted development a control plane that lives in your repo:

  • RFCs say what must be true
  • ADRs record why a design was chosen
  • Work items track execution and acceptance criteria
  • Verification guards enforce executable completion gates

The point is not bureaucracy. The point is that AI-generated changes become reviewable, traceable, and phase-gated.

Why govctl

Most AI coding tools optimize for generation. govctl optimizes for delivery.

Without explicit governance, teams drift into the same pattern:

  • ideas jump straight into implementation
  • decisions live in chat history instead of artifacts
  • code and specs diverge silently
  • "done" means "the agent stopped typing", not "the work passed verification"

govctl closes that gap by making governed artifacts, lifecycle, and verification part of the normal workflow.

Without govctl:
  prompt -> code -> drift -> arguments

With govctl:
  RFC / ADR -> work item -> guarded implementation -> stable history

What Makes It Different

1. Spec-first by default

govctl is built around the idea that implementation follows governed artifacts.

In practice, that means:

  • RFCs describe externally relevant behavior and constraints
  • ADRs record design choices and trade-offs
  • work items execute against those artifacts
  • verification guards and lifecycle gates decide when work is actually done

Instead of treating prompts as the source of truth, the source of truth becomes governed artifacts in the repository.

2. Artifacts are the control plane

govctl does not hide governance behind a web app or an MCP server.

Artifacts live in gov/ as TOML files with schema headers, references, and stable CLI access. That means:

  • changes are diffable
  • decisions are reviewable in PRs
  • agents can operate against files and commands you already understand

3. One CLI agents can reliably operate

The CLI is the operating surface for agents:

  • list, show, get, edit
  • resource-specific lifecycle verbs like adr accept, rfc advance, rfc supersede, and work move
  • path-first mutation through edit
  • explicit help text designed to act as a reliable command contract

This matters because agent workflows get better when the interface is stable, local, and inspectable.

4. Works in brownfield repositories

This is not only for greenfield projects.

For existing repositories, the /migrate workflow helps you adopt governance incrementally: discover undocumented decisions, backfill ADRs, and establish governed artifacts without restarting the project.

Quick Start

CLI

# Install from source
cargo install govctl

# Or install a prebuilt binary (faster, skips compilation)
cargo binstall govctl

govctl init
govctl status

To update an existing installation:

govctl self-update

Then create your first governed artifacts:

govctl rfc new "Caching Strategy"
govctl adr new "Choose cache backend"
govctl work new --active "implement caching"

Agent workflow

Run govctl init and use the installed workflows with your agent:

  • /discuss <topic> to draft RFCs and ADRs
  • /gov <task> to execute governed implementation
  • /quick <task> for intentionally small changes
  • /commit to record work with governance checks

For Claude Code plugin installation:

/plugin marketplace add govctl-org/govctl
/plugin install govctl@govctl
/govctl:init

For a global Codex installation:

mkdir -p ~/.codex
cd ~/.codex
govctl init
govctl init-skills --format codex --dir .

This keeps the govctl-managed workspace, generated skills, and generated agents inside ~/.codex instead of writing governance files into your home directory.

A concrete example

govctl rfc new "Verification Guard Policy"
govctl clause new RFC-0015:C-GUARD-REQUIREMENTS "Required guards" -s "Verification" -k normative
govctl adr new "Require clippy on parser refactors"
govctl work new --active "add parser lint guard"

Core Capabilities

Canonical artifact operations

Agents and humans work through a stable CLI contract.

Read the exact field you need:

govctl rfc get RFC-0001 status

For precise artifact mutation, govctl provides a canonical path-first interface:

govctl adr edit ADR-0038 decision --stdin
govctl work edit WI-2026-01-17-001 acceptance_criteria[0].status --set done
govctl clause edit RFC-0002:C-CRUD-VERBS text --stdin

This is not the product's identity. It is the low-level tool agents use to update governed artifacts precisely and consistently.

Verification guards

Guards are executable checks that run when work reaches completion gates.

Define reusable project defaults in gov/config.toml:

[verification]
enabled = true
default_guards = ["GUARD-GOVCTL-CHECK", "GUARD-CARGO-TEST"]

You can also require extra guards on a specific work item or waive a guard with an explicit reason. See:

Brownfield adoption vs format migration

These are related, but different:

  • /migrate workflow — adopt govctl in an existing repository by discovering decisions, backfilling ADRs, and introducing governance incrementally
  • govctl migrate command — upgrade existing govctl-managed artifacts to the current on-disk format and schema

For format upgrades:

govctl migrate
govctl check

As of the 0.8.x line, RFC and clause artifacts are written canonically as TOML. Legacy JSON is supported for migration and compatibility on read, not as an ongoing write format.

Interactive TUI

govctl tui

Browse RFCs, ADRs, work items, and guards with styled rendering in the terminal.

Who This Is For

  • Teams using Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, or similar agents for real product work
  • Projects that want AI assistance without losing reviewability
  • Brownfield repositories that need governance without a rewrite
  • Engineers who want specs, decisions, and work tracking to live in the repo

Documentation

Community

Contributing

govctl is intentionally opinionated:

  • features start with governed artifacts, not implementation-first
  • RFCs and ADRs are part of the product, not side documentation
  • verification and lifecycle are core behavior, not optional extras

If that matches how you want AI-assisted development to work, contributions are welcome.


License

MIT

Star History

Star History Chart

"Discipline is not the opposite of creativity. It is the foundation."

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors

Languages