Skip to content

Update clap Rust crates to v4.6.0#8543

Open
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
deps/rs/clap-rust-crates
Open

Update clap Rust crates to v4.6.0#8543
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
deps/rs/clap-rust-crates

Conversation

@hash-worker
Copy link
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker bot commented Mar 13, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
clap workspace.dependencies minor 4.5.60 -> 4.6.0
clap_builder workspace.dependencies minor 4.5.60 -> 4.6.0
clap_complete workspace.dependencies minor 4.5.66 -> 4.6.0

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

clap-rs/clap (clap)

v4.6.0

Compare Source

Compatibility
  • Update MSRV to 1.85

v4.5.61

Compare Source

Internal
  • Update dependencies

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge March 13, 2026 01:46
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 13, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
hash Error Error Mar 13, 2026 1:59am
hashdotdesign Ready Ready Preview, Comment Mar 13, 2026 1:59am
hashdotdesign-tokens Ready Ready Preview, Comment Mar 13, 2026 1:59am
petrinaut Ready Ready Preview, Comment Mar 13, 2026 1:59am

@cursor
Copy link

cursor bot commented Mar 13, 2026

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Primarily a dependency refresh, but it updates the CLI parsing stack (clap*) and pulls in new transitive versions (including parallel anstream/anstyle-parse majors and windows-sys version shifts), which could affect build/MSRV and platform-specific behavior.

Overview
Updates the Rust CLI dependency set by bumping clap, clap_builder, clap_complete, and clap_derive to v4.6.0 (lockfile update).

This refresh cascades into transitive dependency graph changes, including introducing anstream v1.0.0 alongside the existing v0.6.21, adding anstyle-parse v1.0.0 alongside v0.2.7, and adjusting several crates’ windows-sys versions (plus a syn version change for data-encoding-macro-internal).

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 6c74490. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label Mar 13, 2026
@augmentcode
Copy link

augmentcode bot commented Mar 13, 2026

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the Rust CLI parsing stack by bumping the clap crates to v4.6.0 (Renovate).

Changes:

  • Bump clap, clap_builder, and clap_complete from the 4.5.x line to 4.6.0.
  • Regenerate the lockfile to reflect the new resolved versions.

Technical Notes: clap v4.6.0 raises its MSRV to Rust 1.85.

🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎

Copy link

@augmentcode augmentcode bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Mar 13, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 56 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 24 skipped benchmarks1


Comparing deps/rs/clap-rust-crates (6c74490) with main (f2f9fe0)2

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 24 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

  2. No successful run was found on main (44fe283) during the generation of this report, so f2f9fe0 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 13, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.67%. Comparing base (f2f9fe0) to head (6c74490).
⚠️ Report is 17 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8543      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.67%   62.67%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1314     1314              
  Lines      133830   133830              
  Branches     5517     5517              
==========================================
- Hits        83880    83878       -2     
- Misses      49035    49037       +2     
  Partials      915      915              
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.40% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks 0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client 51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 9.63% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack 90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec 84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net 96.16% <ø> (-0.04%) ⬇️
rust.harpc-tower 66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol 92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec 72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api 2.63% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization 62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store 26.65% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store 37.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning 47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation 83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core 82.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics 72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr 94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$27.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 206 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.979 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.437 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001 $$12.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.546 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$44.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 344 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.931 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 106 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.862 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526 $$25.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 214 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.001 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 222 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.220 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.741 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$14.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.544 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$3.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.530 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.043 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51 $$3.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.534 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$5.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.765 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.481 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107 $$4.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.238 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$4.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.346 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$4.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.042 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.328 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1 $$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.673 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$3.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.903 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.457 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$3.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.107 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.184 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25 $$3.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$3.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.088 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$3.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.283 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$3.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.095 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.161 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$3.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.856 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth 1 entities $$46.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 252 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.779 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 10 entities $$84.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 492 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 25 entities $$51.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 371 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.912 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 5 entities $$53.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 353 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.604 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 50 entities $$63.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 370 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.363 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 1 entities $$48.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 247 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 10 entities $$424 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.10 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.651 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 25 entities $$102 \mathrm{ms} \pm 538 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.089 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 5 entities $$93.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 542 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.651 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 50 entities $$331 \mathrm{ms} \pm 919 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}12.4 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 1 entities $$20.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 117 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 10 entities $$20.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 128 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 25 entities $$21.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 115 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 5 entities $$21.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 122 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 50 entities $$25.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 137 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$20.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 110 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.157 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$20.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 130 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.487 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$20.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 118 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$20.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 107 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.352 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$26.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.742 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$35.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 298 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$34.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 330 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$35.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 306 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.023 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$35.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 347 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$35.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 384 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.377 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$35.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 357 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.778 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$35.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 267 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.310 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$34.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 315 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.931 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$34.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 333 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.208 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$8.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$94.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 979 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.176 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$146 \mathrm{ms} \pm 729 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.194 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$102 \mathrm{ms} \pm 688 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.387 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 633 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.105 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 639 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.016 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$127 \mathrm{ms} \pm 699 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.013 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$102 \mathrm{ms} \pm 566 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.159 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$131 \mathrm{ms} \pm 570 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.164 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 560 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$118 \mathrm{ms} \pm 429 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.135 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 484 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.082 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 566 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.961 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$142 \mathrm{ms} \pm 633 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$152 \mathrm{ms} \pm 639 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 546 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.321 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$559 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.73 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.183 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

@hash-worker hash-worker bot requested a review from a team March 13, 2026 03:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area)

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants