Skip to content

Conversation

@q1blue
Copy link

@q1blue q1blue commented Jan 24, 2026

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 4 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • responsibleai_vision/requirements-automl.txt
⚠️ Warning
statsmodels 0.13.5 requires scipy, which is not installed.
statsmodels 0.13.5 requires scipy, which is not installed.
sklearn-pandas 1.7.0 requires scipy, which is not installed.
shap 0.42.1 requires scipy, which is not installed.
scikit-learn 1.0.2 requires scipy, which is not installed.
saliency 0.1.3 requires scikit-image, which is not installed.
resnest 0.0.6b20210504 requires scipy, which is not installed.
raiutils 0.4.2 requires scipy, which is not installed.
pyOpenSSL 24.3.0 has requirement cryptography<45,>=41.0.5, but you have cryptography 45.0.7.
pmdarima 1.8.5 requires scipy, which is not installed.
onnxruntime 1.14.1 has requirement numpy>=1.21.6, but you have numpy 1.21.3.
mlflow-skinny 1.30.1 has requirement packaging<22, but you have packaging 24.0.
mlflow-skinny 1.30.1 has requirement pytz<2023, but you have pytz 2025.2.
mlflow-skinny 1.30.1 has requirement importlib-metadata!=4.7.0,<6,>=3.7.0, but you have importlib-metadata 6.7.0.
ml-wrappers 0.5.6 requires scipy, which is not installed.
lightgbm 3.2.1 requires scipy, which is not installed.
interpret-community 0.31.0 requires scipy, which is not installed.
gensim 3.8.3 requires scipy, which is not installed.
botocore 1.23.19 has requirement jmespath<1.0.0,>=0.7.1, but you have jmespath 1.0.1.
boto3 1.20.19 has requirement jmespath<1.0.0,>=0.7.1, but you have jmespath 1.0.1.
azureml-training-tabular 1.55.0.post1 requires scipy, which is not installed.
azureml-train-automl-runtime 1.55.0.post1 requires scipy, which is not installed.
azureml-train-automl-runtime 1.55.0.post1 has requirement pyarrow==14.0.2, but you have pyarrow 12.0.1.
azureml-train-automl-runtime 1.55.0.post1 has requirement scikit-learn==1.1.3, but you have scikit-learn 1.0.2.
azureml-automl-runtime 1.55.0.post1 requires scipy, which is not installed.
azureml-automl-runtime 1.55.0.post1 has requirement scikit-learn==1.1.3, but you have scikit-learn 1.0.2.
azureml-automl-dnn-vision 1.55.0.post2 requires scikit-image, which is not installed.
arch 5.3.1 requires scipy, which is not installed.

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
🦉 Buffer Overflow
🦉 Directory Traversal

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @q1blue, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, addresses four security vulnerabilities within the project's Python dependencies. It updates specific package versions in responsibleai_vision/requirements-automl.txt to mitigate these risks, ensuring the project's security posture is improved.

Highlights

  • Dependency Updates: The pull request introduces updates for pyasn1, torch, and wheel in the responsibleai_vision/requirements-automl.txt file.
  • Vulnerability Fixes: These dependency updates are specifically aimed at resolving 4 identified security vulnerabilities, as indicated by Snyk.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request from Snyk proposes upgrading pyasn1, torch, and wheel to address security vulnerabilities. While security is crucial, these changes, especially the major version upgrade of torch to 2.x, pose a critical risk of breaking the project. The PR description itself includes a long list of existing dependency conflicts, indicating a fragile environment. Merging this PR will likely exacerbate these issues and lead to a non-functional state. The upgrade of torch from 1.13.1 to >=2.10.0 is a major change that often includes breaking APIs, and it conflicts with the project's apparent strategy of avoiding major version bumps for key libraries like numpy and pydantic. Due to the high probability of introducing breaking changes and dependency conflicts, I recommend not merging this PR as is. A more robust approach is needed: first, address the existing dependency conflicts reported in the PR description; second, carefully evaluate the torch upgrade, addressing any necessary code changes; and third, consider using a dependency management tool like pip-tools to create a consistent, locked set of dependencies. This will ensure that security vulnerabilities are fixed without compromising the stability of the project.

Comment on lines +3 to +5
pyasn1>=0.6.2 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
torch>=2.10.0 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
wheel>=0.46.2 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability No newline at end of file

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

This change introduces a major version upgrade for torch (from 1.x to >=2.10.0). This is a significant risk and is likely to introduce breaking API changes, which could break existing functionality that depends on torch (e.g., via torchmetrics). Other dependencies in this project, like pydantic and numpy, are carefully pinned to avoid major version upgrades, and the same caution should be applied here. Additionally, pinning transitive dependencies in this file can lead to a fragile dependency setup. The extensive list of warnings in the pull request description indicates that the dependency tree is already inconsistent. Merging these changes without resolving the underlying conflicts will likely break the environment. It is strongly recommended to reject this automated change and instead perform a comprehensive update of dependencies, resolving all conflicts, and thoroughly testing the application.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants