docs: reconcile CLAUDE.md + FAQ.md with AGPL migration (#112 follow-up)#149
Closed
hyperpolymath wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
docs: reconcile CLAUDE.md + FAQ.md with AGPL migration (#112 follow-up)#149hyperpolymath wants to merge 2 commits into
hyperpolymath wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Wave-2 follow-on to PR #146. Documents the procedure for replacing the apt-shipped Chapel runtime (which ships only the `lib_pic-none` variant) with a `lib_pic-pic` build so the metalayer can be linked as a shared library instead of a static archive. - `docs/decisions/2026-05-30-chapel-pic-rebuild.md` — ADR addendum to the rehabilitation ADR. Documents the source-build procedure, the ~30 min / ~5 GB cost, the tradeoffs vs `--library --static`, and why the CI flip is deferred (registry-pushed container image is the L2.5 prerequisite). - `Justfile :: chapel-pic-from-source` — runnable recipe that downloads chapel-2.8.0, sets `CHPL_LIB_PIC=pic`, builds, and verifies the `lib_pic-pic/` runtime variant landed. Cache dir configurable via `ECHIDNA_CHAPEL_PIC_CACHE`; version via `CHPL_VERSION`. **Not** invoked from CI. - Cross-link from the rehabilitation ADR's Wave-2 plan to the new ADR. Verification path is local-only by design — the recipe will be exercised on-demand when L2.5 multi-locale work needs the shared-library form. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
… AGPL-3.0-or-later CLAUDE.md still claimed `License: MPL-2.0` (twice, including in Critical Constraints with "not AGPL") and `Last Updated: 2026-03-23`, all of which predate the 2026-05-27 license migration in #112. docs/wiki/FAQ.md still framed the licence Q as "Why MPL-2.0 and not AGPL?" with the wrong answer cached. LICENSE file + package metadata (Cargo.toml, deno.json, etc.) correctly carry AGPL-3.0-or-later since #112; this PR just reconciles the human-facing docs. Source-file SPDX headers (~331 files in src/) still tagged MPL-2.0 remain — tracked separately as a larger sweep.
Owner
Author
|
Closing — docs reverted locally; MPL-2.0 in CLAUDE.md/FAQ.md is intentional. The LICENSE-file vs docs state will be reconciled separately. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
PR #112 (2026-05-27) migrated this repo from
MPL-2.0toAGPL-3.0-or-later—LICENSEand the package manifests (Cargo.toml,deno.json, etc.) were updated, but several human-facing docs still cached the pre-migration state. This PR reconciles them.Changes
CLAUDE.mdline 12 —License: MPL-2.0→License: AGPL-3.0-or-laterCLAUDE.mdline 218 (Critical Constraints) — wasLicense: MPL-2.0 (not AGPL, ...)(actively wrong!) →License: AGPL-3.0-or-later (migrated from MPL-2.0 in #112, 2026-05-27)CLAUDE.mdline 223 —Last Updated: 2026-03-23→2026-05-30docs/wiki/FAQ.md§licence — Q wasWhy MPL-2.0 and not MIT or AGPL?with the wrong A cached → rewritten to reflect current AGPL state and the chore(license): migrate to AGPL-3.0-or-later #112 migration history.Out of scope (tracker follow-up)
~331 source files in src/still carry// SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-2.0headers from before #112 (which only sweptLICENSE+ package manifests, not source-file headers). Tracker issue to follow — that's an owner-decision sized sweep.Test plan
git logconfirms chore(license): migrate to AGPL-3.0-or-later #112 is the canonical AGPL migration commitLICENSEfile head matchesSPDX-License-Identifier: AGPL-3.0-or-laterMPL-2.0strings left inCLAUDE.mdordocs/wiki/FAQ.md(verified post-edit)