-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27.4k
refactor: apply Factory Enum Pattern for cleaner object instantiation #3523
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
prashantpiyush1111
wants to merge
5
commits into
iluwatar:master
Choose a base branch
from
prashantpiyush1111:fix/factory-clean
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+27
−3
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7c3a3a0
refactor: apply Factory Enum Pattern for cleaner object instantiation
prashantpiyush1111 106b065
style: fix formatting in CoinFactoryTest
prashantpiyush1111 402abb4
refactor(factory): apply enum-based factory pattern
prashantpiyush1111 1e2350a
style(factory): fix test indentation
prashantpiyush1111 569afc8
style(factory): add trailing newline
prashantpiyush1111 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
getInstance() implements lazy initialization without synchronization, which is not thread-safe. In multi-threaded scenarios, two threads could observe instance == null and both create a Coin, potentially leaking one and returning a non-singleton. Consider a thread-safe lazy initialization strategy (e.g., double-checked locking with a volatile field, or initialize at enum construction).