Skip to content

[WIP] [DNM] test rootless#3416

Draft
matejvasek wants to merge 2 commits intoknative:mainfrom
matejvasek:test-rootless
Draft

[WIP] [DNM] test rootless#3416
matejvasek wants to merge 2 commits intoknative:mainfrom
matejvasek:test-rootless

Conversation

@matejvasek
Copy link
Contributor

Changes

/kind

Fixes #

Release Note


Docs


Signed-off-by: Matej Vašek <matejvasek@gmail.com>
@knative-prow
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Feb 4, 2026

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@knative-prow
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Feb 4, 2026

@matejvasek: The label(s) kind/<kind> cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them.

Details

In response to this:

Changes

/kind

Fixes #

Release Note


Docs


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 4, 2026
@knative-prow
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Feb 4, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: matejvasek

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow knative-prow bot requested a review from dsimansk February 4, 2026 15:41
@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 4, 2026
@knative-prow knative-prow bot requested a review from jrangelramos February 4, 2026 15:41
@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 4, 2026
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 4, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 52.57%. Comparing base (29b41b3) to head (33f795f).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3416      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   54.61%   52.57%   -2.05%     
==========================================
  Files         179      179              
  Lines       20228    20228              
==========================================
- Hits        11047    10634     -413     
- Misses       8010     8474     +464     
+ Partials     1171     1120      -51     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 23.02% <ø> (-15.55%) ⬇️
e2e go ?
e2e node ?
e2e python ?
e2e quarkus ?
e2e rust ?
e2e springboot ?
e2e typescript ?
integration 17.58% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
unit macos-14 42.28% <ø> (ø)
unit macos-latest 42.28% <ø> (ø)
unit ubuntu-24.04-arm 42.61% <ø> (ø)
unit ubuntu-latest 43.17% <ø> (ø)
unit windows-latest 42.30% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Signed-off-by: Matej Vašek <matejvasek@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant