Skip to content

TEL-459: route outbound sip traffic through a proxy#643

Open
hechen-eng wants to merge 9 commits intomainfrom
out_fe
Open

TEL-459: route outbound sip traffic through a proxy#643
hechen-eng wants to merge 9 commits intomainfrom
out_fe

Conversation

@hechen-eng
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@hechen-eng hechen-eng requested a review from a team as a code owner March 31, 2026 22:04
@hechen-eng hechen-eng force-pushed the out_fe branch 2 times, most recently from 1b53df5 to 652db1a Compare April 1, 2026 23:24
return AttrsToHeaders(r.LocalParticipant.Attributes(), c.sipConf.attrsToHeaders, headers)
})
if sipConf.featureFlags[outboundRouteHeadersFeatureFlag] == "true" {
call.cc.routeHeaders = conf.OutboundRouteHeaders
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we should consider putting these URIs to the CreateSIPParticipant request instead? This would allow the user to add any external proxies to the path, as we as Cloud who will inject it's own set of URIs. In that case we won't need a feature flag here even.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good idea, and I think it'll be helpful to do percentage traffic migration there. That being said, feature flag is still useful here if we only want to enable it for UHG, which is our plan. We may need both..

@hechen-eng hechen-eng force-pushed the out_fe branch 3 times, most recently from c62f82f to 9453e13 Compare April 5, 2026 03:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants